Received: from mail-pv0-f189.google.com ([74.125.83.189]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Q9V7w-0005OO-E0; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 21:23:00 -0700 Received: by pvc22 with SMTP id 22sf1559676pvc.16 for ; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 21:22:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:x-beenthere:received-spf:date:from:to:subject :message-id:mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :user-agent:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-disposition :content-transfer-encoding; bh=rpA6LUWoI8T1hqkh5MMH/wKM8/hPgIHg4KPJ1/OtHJs=; b=PN8zGsICDde7R8Ym7epfjIHq5wtkiwE6XuKI7A8WIO1gfour+GdWv25d2iUjCSLbrr MhIUJN4VyG8/ZL1R018GLuPAysJShlnnKmVspkTfKbzoQHkrJpe3jH7m89I/R/WwKD8s OH8XcxyI4bJWLPUglhJ2ngperbZ8oQqxGJDQM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:date:from:to:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:in-reply-to:user-agent :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding; b=RV7ynSO1Xp5DdHSnanIEnbTGCPFscZY1wXaOZaVmwzB21fZ6yx9EcofBVdEgHoJdUM /9nXAvZO1rfpOzxwSTFTU0/8MdzqmXYWFU4+LFP9QRt8P/AiseqwqpyvYQ+6RNALkDNJ BaRvCS4ziG2PR1dJ5I5VnE5rn2MeUI6JFAT3A= Received: by 10.142.214.2 with SMTP id m2mr337262wfg.57.1302582164851; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 21:22:44 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.142.218.15 with SMTP id q15ls4195831wfg.0.p; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 21:22:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.143.26.10 with SMTP id d10mr5018401wfj.59.1302582163302; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 21:22:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.143.26.10 with SMTP id d10mr5018400wfj.59.1302582163281; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 21:22:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org (digitalkingdom.org [173.13.139.234]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u26si6793221wfc.1.2011.04.11.21.22.42 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 11 Apr 2011 21:22:42 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org designates 173.13.139.234 as permitted sender) client-ip=173.13.139.234; Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Q9V7h-0005Ne-8x for bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 21:22:41 -0700 Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 21:22:41 -0700 From: Robin Lee Powell To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [bpfk] Uniqueness across quantification. Message-ID: <20110412042241.GP21357@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com References: <20110327235147.GM14415@digitalkingdom.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Original-Sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org designates 173.13.139.234 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 972099695765 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1163 On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 09:03:05AM -0300, Jorge Llamb=EDas wrote: =20 > If what you want to say is that three humans share one house, you > could say: >=20 > lo ci remna cu kansi'u lo ka xabju lo (pa) zdani >=20 > If you want to say that they each live in a different house, I > would suggest: >=20 > ro lo ci remna cu xabju lo frica zdani >=20 > which is not logically rigorous, but it's clear enough. If you do > need logical rigour, I don't see any way other than multiple > sentences. What would those multiple sentences be? -Robin --=20 http://singinst.org/ : Our last, best hope for a fantastic future. Lojban (http://www.lojban.org/): The language in which "this parrot is dead" is "ti poi spitaki cu morsi", but "this sentence is false" is "na nei". My personal page: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/rlp/ --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= BPFK" group. To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googleg= roups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-l= ist?hl=3Den.