Received: from mail-ee0-f61.google.com ([74.125.83.61]:45566) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1ReAvU-0007Fq-N2; Fri, 23 Dec 2011 11:37:13 -0800 Received: by eekc4 with SMTP id c4sf7622618eek.16 for ; Fri, 23 Dec 2011 11:37:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=j0PtZK3fTe0gloEv9M1XnZio3A2CxVs+uPjJKUK7UYM=; b=NdrRCT7+zGSQ7t2qAq86obYYl62uGr4pRZRq57wQqR3wYE+blmi4XaUd7i+nL6KJd0 07PL+fo80Art4v7Y9EDBPEaHodq0GKXRRtoKsX1Walda7hd1jwGIIfpPJVJQZjQEG3RG TAqwTxsU8YRwWGXV6iOOMhnJdxq7Am7lIE/7g= Received: by 10.204.149.199 with SMTP id u7mr1339529bkv.29.1324669014861; Fri, 23 Dec 2011 11:36:54 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.204.152.154 with SMTP id g26ls41777574bkw.3.gmail; Fri, 23 Dec 2011 11:36:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.129.78 with SMTP id n14mr656157bks.5.1324669014283; Fri, 23 Dec 2011 11:36:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.129.78 with SMTP id n14mr656156bks.5.1324669014260; Fri, 23 Dec 2011 11:36:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f42.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f42.google.com [209.85.215.42]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u4si1588815bkf.3.2011.12.23.11.36.54 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 23 Dec 2011 11:36:54 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.42 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.215.42; Received: by lagj5 with SMTP id j5so3897138lag.29 for ; Fri, 23 Dec 2011 11:36:53 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.114.103 with SMTP id jf7mr5678640lab.22.1324669013854; Fri, 23 Dec 2011 11:36:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.152.114.230 with HTTP; Fri, 23 Dec 2011 11:36:53 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20111223175808.GH23459@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2011 12:36:53 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [bpfk] Can we drop the fore tanru cmavo? From: Jonathan Jones To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: eyeonus@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.42 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=eyeonus@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 972099695765 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d04083a4b0409c204b4c78af0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / Content-Length: 4392 --f46d04083a4b0409c204b4c78af0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Isn't there a proposal to get rid of basically all the groups of connectives save one? On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Jorge Llamb=EDas wr= ote: > On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Robin Lee Powell > wrote: > > > > i.e., can PEG support having one set of fore logical connectives > > only, or is the issue deeper than lookahead? > > If the question is whether guheks can be replaced by geks, then the > answer is no, because tanru "gu'e broda gi brode" is different from > bridi "ge broda gi brode". Compare "(gu'e broda gi brode) ko'a" with > "ge (broda) gi (brode ko'a)". > > If the question is whether guheks would be missed by anyone if they > were just dropped, then probably not. I don't think anyone ever uses > them. > > mu'o mi'e xorxes > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "BPFK" group. > To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=3Den. > > --=20 mu'o mi'e .aionys. .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= BPFK" group. To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googleg= roups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-l= ist?hl=3Den. --f46d04083a4b0409c204b4c78af0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Isn't there a proposal to get rid of basically all the groups of connec= tives save one?

On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 1= 1:54 AM, Jorge Llamb=EDas <jjllambias@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 2:= 58 PM, Robin Lee Powell
<rlpowell@digitalkingdom.= org> wrote:
>
> i.e., can PEG support having one set of fore logical connectives
> only, or is the issue deeper than lookahead?

If the question is whether guheks can be replaced by geks, then the answer is no, because tanru "gu'e broda gi brode" is differen= t from
bridi "ge broda gi brode". Compare "(gu'e broda gi brode= ) ko'a" with
"ge (broda) gi (brode ko'a)".

If the question is whether guheks would be missed by anyone if they
were just dropped, then probably not. I don't think anyone ever uses them.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;BPFK" group.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.<= br> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bp= fk-list?hl=3Den.




--
mu'o mi= 'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.l= uk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. = :D )

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= BPFK" group.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googleg= roups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-l= ist?hl=3Den.
--f46d04083a4b0409c204b4c78af0--