Received: from mail-pw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.160.61]:36023)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <bpfk-list+bncCK30vq5WEJHq0_cEGgRQAqcw@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1ReCq5-0007pA-TV; Fri, 23 Dec 2011 13:39:50 -0800
Received: by pbcc3 with SMTP id c3sf6982736pbc.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Fri, 23 Dec 2011 13:39:35 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=x-beenthere:received-spf:date:from:to:subject:message-id
         :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:in-reply-to:user-agent
         :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to
         :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post
         :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe
         :content-type:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=VaixcGt0tZwaswtbQve2OyqD3W5WewaFvyN6IzD4aH8=;
        b=VU1ZzjAY3fnTSHWNp1hmik0+V4RQJYG9qG0qRDZBR48BtEHDD8RdYBLnPOFqROTGCV
         tgJrR4x/Az2bTcdUF5LtObkah6MIDWNqz1Iq7Eflo4vwZV5dVExuh5ASOdW4DOscTmU5
         ehnay2H9A7AANoRHtSb10aGwe0tP1N/WQ8aZs=
Received: by 10.68.73.228 with SMTP id o4mr3396691pbv.17.1324676369625;
        Fri, 23 Dec 2011 13:39:29 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.68.11.197 with SMTP id s5ls17596801pbb.0.gmail; Fri, 23 Dec
 2011 13:39:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.68.74.201 with SMTP id w9mr11651799pbv.0.1324676369076;
        Fri, 23 Dec 2011 13:39:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.68.74.201 with SMTP id w9mr11651798pbv.0.1324676369066;
        Fri, 23 Dec 2011 13:39:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stodi.digitalkingdom.org (mail.digitalkingdom.org. [173.13.139.236])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n3si15806102pbd.1.2011.12.23.13.39.29
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Fri, 23 Dec 2011 13:39:29 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org designates 173.13.139.236 as permitted sender) client-ip=173.13.139.236;
Received: from rlpowell by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>)
	id 1ReCps-0007p4-6C
	for bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; Fri, 23 Dec 2011 13:39:28 -0800
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2011 13:39:28 -0800
From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [bpfk] Can we drop the fore tanru cmavo?
Message-ID: <20111223213927.GK23459@stodi.digitalkingdom.org>
Mail-Followup-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
References: <20111223175808.GH23459@stodi.digitalkingdom.org>
 <CAO7tK2cEF-n3mZc4+eVCgOHfa5Bg=vsYdHZ9uBDgOWZnB3k5gw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAO7tK2cEF-n3mZc4+eVCgOHfa5Bg=vsYdHZ9uBDgOWZnB3k5gw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Original-Sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com:
 best guess record for domain of rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org designates
 173.13.139.236 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <bpfk-list.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 972099695765
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:bpfk-list@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:bpfk-list+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=en_US>
Sender: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:bpfk-list+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/subscribe?hl=en_US>,
 <mailto:googlegroups-manage+972099695765+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Spam_score: -0.7
X-Spam_score_int: -6
X-Spam_bar: /
Content-Length: 1194

On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 03:54:44PM -0300, Jorge Llamb=EDas wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Robin Lee Powell
> <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote:
> >
> > i.e., can PEG support having one set of fore logical connectives
> > only, or is the issue deeper than lookahead?
>=20
> If the question is whether guheks can be replaced by geks, then
> the answer is no, because tanru "gu'e broda gi brode" is different
> from bridi "ge broda gi brode". Compare "(gu'e broda gi brode)
> ko'a" with "ge (broda) gi (brode ko'a)".

Yeah, I was afraid of that.  Thanks.

-Robin

--=20
http://singinst.org/ :  Our last, best hope for a fantastic future.
Lojban (http://www.lojban.org/): The language in which "this parrot
is dead" is "ti poi spitaki cu morsi", but "this sentence is false"
is "na nei".   My personal page: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/rlp/

--=20
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "=
BPFK" group.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googleg=
roups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-l=
ist?hl=3Den.