Received: from mail-ye0-f183.google.com ([209.85.213.183]:39671) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1ThWUp-0007Kk-LA; Sat, 08 Dec 2012 18:20:24 -0800 Received: by mail-ye0-f183.google.com with SMTP id r5sf1160185yen.10 for ; Sat, 08 Dec 2012 18:19:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:references:from:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:message-id:subject:to:cc:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=jRnvvFdEEzLv2y0vFA97SY42+2dd1mrcxw31lUijUXY=; b=jG2EVxFsVmImYaX5ptXcspqFcF06Gi4UpQiNiLjBAN5OHLEKmv7pUo8ly3dckybgRy cExPmdVWHSjQ3GZSoP7kDzDIjxDUb0vdhh1+dDLRjaualkLCHhigH4czcX2/wUlFtg88 P8zUUFCPdDZuOj2O+OKA/+xB7t2jspEYavld6zyt5sclPFTlQEyoaldp/CNfh2+wF0xH X/iwT71trVf0rv1WhXdNZKXZT3zAR6pl1biZgrOSOZMenMGo0cOPhHTFJiOAlmmsX/EF 82GU1HpiUC8diSOyCMnh4F9W25ErKK/gCZb3YAJKcEoeuThAXRlgeHdSis6TV3FduNOB HwjQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:references:from:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:message-id:subject:to:cc:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=jRnvvFdEEzLv2y0vFA97SY42+2dd1mrcxw31lUijUXY=; b=gfKDkC4UgJkldZsJ2/Qb6IItJyoX6+eYjy17iOLcH1gWgETFXU5cWmU5ktcE/Tp/tC /P3SS1goyro1uxh3PoOBpYxIzmuiwRCalqMVNgdq21fXBLHLNG9GB9QYsMIpzfkgepaj Sr2LJa76wh2VmrtCdcZI0vWjOvbflPGA3YFr2lGjJL6pJ9bp1kegy3IpgGhvziXr11fP gZbj7V+1fd/MFhdF019KDMAmx4u722d/fYeidC4zrncBR+IOwoiTWMwYgaU08Y51zR13 AZdwm+HbtiipQ6rzAjZy0W4aqox78Y73MxEaImBgYMmSNvF7c92dTjZUarRBNrB5Z5Vf pGHw== Received: by 10.50.91.230 with SMTP id ch6mr1268922igb.9.1355019592934; Sat, 08 Dec 2012 18:19:52 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.50.158.199 with SMTP id ww7ls741171igb.42.gmail; Sat, 08 Dec 2012 18:19:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.43.81.196 with SMTP id zz4mr7291707icb.14.1355019592477; Sat, 08 Dec 2012 18:19:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.50.96.228 with SMTP id dv4msigb; Sat, 8 Dec 2012 06:24:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.43.115.73 with SMTP id fd9mr6324089icc.2.1354976664049; Sat, 08 Dec 2012 06:24:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.43.115.73 with SMTP id fd9mr6324088icc.2.1354976664036; Sat, 08 Dec 2012 06:24:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-ia0-f170.google.com (mail-ia0-f170.google.com [209.85.210.170]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id dx8si123366igc.1.2012.12.08.06.24.24 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 08 Dec 2012 06:24:24 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of dbrockman@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.170 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.210.170; Received: by mail-ia0-f170.google.com with SMTP id i1so4043881iaa.1 for ; Sat, 08 Dec 2012 06:24:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.50.196.166 with SMTP id in6mr1958472igc.63.1354976663918; Sat, 08 Dec 2012 06:24:23 -0800 (PST) References: <95cdbee4-7ddc-4f7d-bb48-4591b7c3d915@googlegroups.com> <50C10003.1080806@lojban.org> <5406c1d2-ee78-4b41-ab68-06b7cf99dce7@googlegroups.com> From: Daniel Brockman Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) In-Reply-To: Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2012 15:24:11 +0100 Message-ID: <3736783724250528476@unknownmsgid> Subject: Re: [bpfk] polysemy of {nai} To: =?UTF-8?Q?Jorge_Llamb=C3=ADas?= Cc: "bpfk-list@googlegroups.com" X-Original-Sender: dbrockman@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of dbrockman@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.170 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=dbrockman@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 972099695765 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.1 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / Content-Length: 2782 *claps* What an impressively lucid exposition. On 8 dec 2012, at 15:16, "Jorge Llamb=EDas" wrote: > On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 6:35 AM, la gleki wro= te: >> >> Anyway, I want all types of negation to fit on the same scheme. >> Last time when I draw a similar scheme I could completely solve (at leas= t >> for myself) the problem of subjunctives in lojban. >> Now it's time for negation. > > Negation is acheved with "na" or "na'e". They both have the same > meaning, just different scopes. "na'e" can pretty much be replaced > with "me lo na" and "na" can pretty much be replaced with "na'e ke ... > ke'e be ... bei ... bei ...". > > "to'e" is not really negation, it is "opposite" or "antonym": > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opposite_(semantics) > Calling it "negation" is just one of those weird Lojbanic > eccentricities. "no'e" expresses the midpoint between something and > its opposite, so it only really works with gradable antonyms. > > "na'i" is a kind of negation, although what it negates is not explicit > in the discourse. It negates a presupposition, something that is taken > for granted as true, and therefore is not expressed. So na'i says that > a sentence cannot be evaluated as either true or false because > something prior that needs to be satisfied to even make sense of the > sentence is not being satisfied. Once the presupposition is expressed > explicitly, it can be negated with "na", as usual. "na'i" just > indicates that there is something unexpressed that wants to be > negated. So "na'i" is a metalinguistic "na". > > "nai" changes the meaning of the preceding word to something with the > same function but different meaning, usually but not always an > opposite meaning. ".enai" for example is not really the opposite of > ".e" (indeed it is not clear what the opposite of ".e" would be, not > every word has a clear opposite). ".enai" is a logical connective > whose truth table is related to the truth table of ".e" in some > systematic way that can be explained using negation. > > mu'o mi'e xorxes > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups= "BPFK" group. > To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googl= egroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk= -list?hl=3Den. > --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= BPFK" group. To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googleg= roups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-l= ist?hl=3Den.