Received: from mail-ie0-f191.google.com ([209.85.223.191]:56104) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1ThLvu-0004ZO-H2; Sat, 08 Dec 2012 07:03:27 -0800 Received: by mail-ie0-f191.google.com with SMTP id c13sf877023ieb.8 for ; Sat, 08 Dec 2012 07:03:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=R5BmjKleWgKMvUUwB1EWcdfA4/w68ckjBIbajYJ0vvs=; b=S0ZWEp81oAFMzMg3Bf+p78r49Gt3seByh9qAeX/k5IvtcOuHFU2rPUQYKTHNl33I1N afosnbrKnkp+1+qeV4ic3ciDI6RtTRWye2IKUNngVt+FnVuGZsf94Q/9uxgo2MfMOCOB 0+ACcaxodWq4FLEzEZ1RAEdk7EA+axWFQca0koK/mOQT2vU8bU48csAoFrc1OZ9kys80 pDEr5GXpO1ifAV1DXzXDtTcgjpYAl1KZRSbywsTYh4+5hN3uH4wNpFpN8mp9GIm1XsSq buGdRlq0TYb+srvOA7R3zSDeJGJKxHm9zgjbF95RwP6nklcG3rUtonj5KwllJzkfh/sR rW8w== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=R5BmjKleWgKMvUUwB1EWcdfA4/w68ckjBIbajYJ0vvs=; b=ANOCq7buGhkmOFxdBjounDVI5ECPQMUS3ezmLCkOWDgxN6NISin59iaPXkz/sT5O7W codmJmiducrSQw6aBHHWwstJBXwGu151fEYyPKPl1CZgTcaWd/uXoMx4TWNNO3UV8GFW 72DcvcIzvIw235mwpkY/uGJFssoakpZJlNXMdD8jl+7bFvRD52Y9rBBs96pn9f67IGbl adwW3CmaarNCaZpye7+MQoLYdx6PFkpK6VzVPZBNs7qs7COypyQJzZuzz/eF7UhGkFEG L3jQfv68yl6Hy7IZhGVJGaXr8FN0RcftpUB1jE7gSKL9UwfaEmbE63sUHrsUcIgYhReC 0tbQ== Received: by 10.50.33.137 with SMTP id r9mr892538igi.8.1354978987958; Sat, 08 Dec 2012 07:03:07 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.50.46.230 with SMTP id y6ls426294igm.43.gmail; Sat, 08 Dec 2012 07:03:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.66.73.134 with SMTP id l6mr1552943pav.0.1354978987581; Sat, 08 Dec 2012 07:03:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.66.73.134 with SMTP id l6mr1552942pav.0.1354978987569; Sat, 08 Dec 2012 07:03:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-pb0-f54.google.com (mail-pb0-f54.google.com [209.85.160.54]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id uz6si3005618pbc.0.2012.12.08.07.03.07 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 08 Dec 2012 07:03:07 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.54 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.160.54; Received: by mail-pb0-f54.google.com with SMTP id wz12so908363pbc.41 for ; Sat, 08 Dec 2012 07:03:07 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.211.42 with SMTP id mz10mr24288938pbc.100.1354978987480; Sat, 08 Dec 2012 07:03:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.66.88.200 with HTTP; Sat, 8 Dec 2012 07:03:07 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <19b747e3-b09b-49f5-8e07-59fb8d920441@googlegroups.com> References: <95cdbee4-7ddc-4f7d-bb48-4591b7c3d915@googlegroups.com> <50C10003.1080806@lojban.org> <5406c1d2-ee78-4b41-ab68-06b7cf99dce7@googlegroups.com> <19b747e3-b09b-49f5-8e07-59fb8d920441@googlegroups.com> Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2012 12:03:07 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [bpfk] polysemy of {nai} From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.54 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 972099695765 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.1 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / Content-Length: 933 On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 11:53 AM, la gleki wrote: > As it's still a BPFK thread my question is why did you suggest moving {nai} > to UI in the long run when it shouldn't have the truth value? I'm not sure I follow the part about truth values. "nai" should be moved to CAI because it does the same as other CAI's, it takes a word and changes it into something with the same function and a systematically related meaning. And CAI should be merged with UI because they have the exact same syntax. It is pointless to have two selma'o with the same syntax. mu'o mi'e xorxes -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group. To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=en.