Received: from mail-vc0-f191.google.com ([209.85.220.191]:51090) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Uwb0W-0004gJ-Fx; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 09:43:23 -0700 Received: by mail-vc0-f191.google.com with SMTP id ht10sf1776843vcb.28 for ; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 09:43:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-beenthere:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=3nPOSVeadfE3WQ2ho6uZUWtXcglY9hoQJjAbMFPOwe4=; b=JeEa1Mqf38zNKF4dHssqTpMTE+DlHcfqK2HWJKL46JhuhAOTg/oWbzKqxrxjz59jex 6qHC+E5w1hoRQ8d9Hv+KhN0dE5T7yZ2KuoGWEXmJ5D30PIG9ttO6h8tj6hjrtx+byph/ rDATsX0RCGZwhsDpN41NoKVatjaPOuS7xUNJzegWwAfr3IySgcutbyvRT1Xbmu0Zr6L6 jHEetW6OkQfilXpyqVmNG2bgE02Toz46tiaesO6c6AtU9leZxRCN0tpxtbuYFVyQ/t6A J2PkTmfnqLmPABPlEPahk+1SPbm75J9Kbqgixroc6zBa2mYX5CP02Fs73DP+x9VzqcaH YjQA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-beenthere:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=3nPOSVeadfE3WQ2ho6uZUWtXcglY9hoQJjAbMFPOwe4=; b=H6/JSWQVhCDbVsw1M7vjHycogmZKe7gFL6PX0Xpb8Lg2aroz47qhb6bacGNQjjfMV0 Y3/fImYWqqY3pFJWBu+zfW9FUl6x+GI3EEdthNxVWdgbRfHUv5K0fpURbQu7lXMh+65F 8lWrQ1W6p7TYWdCiV65e4zO/+wvGVs2M9wJtCFfDfXmtguKokFp9Pi88TuZb3VPYgjAs B2BYwNe1AwGYoC0Ze78gGSOJv4VXvm82D11V9mRpp/3CrDctdmr+VkrnwOB4JYlwe2rc z5+YRJVKJiBOBSb4zPnU66GW0lRtTj2xPEJpXiwP1/gGaQ4nNGEYhLNsm1ol45QOJkuk ra3Q== X-Received: by 10.49.36.199 with SMTP id s7mr750159qej.17.1373388189528; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 09:43:09 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.49.132.197 with SMTP id ow5ls2326628qeb.97.gmail; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 09:43:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.58.106.198 with SMTP id gw6mr3354853veb.6.1373388189312; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 09:43:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-vb0-x234.google.com (mail-vb0-x234.google.com [2607:f8b0:400c:c02::234]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n5si1926960vdt.0.2013.07.09.09.43.09 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 09 Jul 2013 09:43:09 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400c:c02::234 as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:400c:c02::234; Received: by mail-vb0-f52.google.com with SMTP id f12so4617995vbg.11 for ; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 09:43:09 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.52.65.10 with SMTP id t10mr14175088vds.90.1373388189203; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 09:43:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.21.67 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 09:43:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20130709161957.GA16990@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> References: <20130709161957.GA16990@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2013 13:43:09 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [bpfk] Fiat Attempt #2 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400c:c02::234 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 972099695765 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf3071cdf828093704e116dbbb X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.1 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / Content-Length: 5459 --20cf3071cdf828093704e116dbbb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 1:19 PM, Robin Lee Powell < rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote: > > I would like to define the defaults for {za'u} and {me'i} to be > "contextually specified, usually the current value for the thing > under discussion", rather than {pa}. > As far as I know, the default for "me'i" is "ro", not "pa". "me'i ro" = "not all", is one of the four Aristotelian quantifiers (ro, no, su'o and me'i). I wouldn't change it. > Two reasons: > > 1. {za'u} and {su'o} mean almost exactly the same thing as > currently defined, similarily {me'i} and {su'e}. Freaking annoying. > > They correspond to >, >=, < and <=. > 2. Everybody uses them that way anyways; see {za'u re'u}, which is > very common, and has almost no meaning without this change: > http://corpus.lojban.org/corpus/search/za'ure'u?showall=y and > http://corpus.lojban.org/corpus/search/za'u%20re'u?showall=y > > "za'u re'u" means the same as "za'u pa re'u", i.e. "for other-than-the-first time" = "again". > In addition, it would give me a clean way to say "I need more flour > for this cake", or whatever. I don't think this is the same as "za'u (some number)". If you already have three cups of flour, when you say you need "more flour", couldn't you mean you need one more cup, which is less than what you already have, less than the current number, not more? mu'o mi'e xorxes -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. --20cf3071cdf828093704e116dbbb Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

= On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 1:19 PM, Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digit= alkingdom.org> wrote:

I would like to define the defaults for {za'u} and {me'i} to be
"contextually specified, usually the current value for the thing
under discussion", rather than {pa}.

As far as I know, the default for "me'i" is "ro= ", not "pa". "me'i ro" =3D "not all"= , is one of the four Aristotelian quantifiers (ro, no, su'o and me'= i). I wouldn't change it.
=A0
Two reasons:

1. =A0{za'u} and {su'o} mean almost exactly the same thing as
currently defined, similarily {me'i} and {su'e}. =A0Freaking annoyi= ng.


They correspond to >, >=3D= , < and <=3D.

=A0
2. =A0Everybody uses them that way anyways; see {za'u re'u}, which = is
very common, and has almost no meaning without this change:
http://corpus.lojban.org/corpus/search/za'ure&#= 39;u?showall=3Dy and
http://corpus.lojban.org/corpus/search/za'u%2= 0re'u?showall=3Dy


"za'u re'u" me= ans the same as "za'u pa re'u", i.e. "for other-than= -the-first time" =3D "again".=A0
=A0
In addition, it would give me a clean way to say "I need more flour for this cake", or whatever.

=A0= I don't think this is the same as "za'u (some number)". I= f you already have three cups of flour, when you say you need "more fl= our", couldn't you mean you need one more cup, which is less than = what you already have, less than the current number, not more?

mu'o mi'e xorxes

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at ht= tp://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 
--20cf3071cdf828093704e116dbbb--