Received: from mail-vb0-f56.google.com ([209.85.212.56]:44587) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1UwbBw-0004q7-4z; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 09:55:16 -0700 Received: by mail-vb0-f56.google.com with SMTP id x14sf1790771vbb.11 for ; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 09:54:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-beenthere:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=L9BwwHnXRZ1gnlWV9nPblke/MfZWSpMLLcOsN2AL05o=; b=ZQCPq941FLGJxZLbixpAWG0HeW1uzYBi3m4Uho0q0X3vfM5eNzrSiv6kf3GDa060H7 D/HGrND6NJmDmfa0VpolM0PkPiHD1G5HqQoo0eb9fCG01BoNI3xBbBZvF+tGtHQZzTUF UFhAb3T9Neh9MVcu28Qst9Yec3dvPNReixp9otYuC8PsG0Ska9Dx1UjF9n+EJ4g5VIJC D8OCTVS08xH8xNyZEUK6o3dI1SKJTOXzd/2FFvgabBMYbBPalKWEp6Twjk5H9KNvRfo7 4r4JuE1JSuphdMDRQ1Tt8zsoeWm0j1YV1pUINpByE+0ILznA5l2A5tfaG/FjVCsC11J1 Y3zg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-beenthere:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=L9BwwHnXRZ1gnlWV9nPblke/MfZWSpMLLcOsN2AL05o=; b=FDMPFLkSv7ULtlqXOsyB7OenUQ7DZkNse8Rq7XLoLQxKivYFM6oz12oIG14oSREASt Rq/ZXfDFM4nCSaVql++z2X9K6zL7peG9Og8BCbbN26r8sYJE1iG4SdVMgsp8awMkYFP8 rdK19VKEmq9COBqsEdiGtwXLBQi375rEVlwrYbtm4DHXsfNoMxEc/8y2Be/WegWWyBa/ IE1+wIIWZERy1fkRs4OUqKPEgPWpd/J6ItpdUquUlvcUf8qNwx+DPztLLY8wf55hRMXQ vIAfpTpmtovAOzI8s4zdT5p9fjMAEkKJgAfbtPV2E703CXIeWwT2pA1+LlZRfiqS3eXc X/GQ== X-Received: by 10.49.64.136 with SMTP id o8mr748748qes.32.1373388897553; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 09:54:57 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.49.129.69 with SMTP id nu5ls1809486qeb.77.gmail; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 09:54:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.49.4.104 with SMTP id j8mr756390qej.40.1373388897368; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 09:54:57 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2013 09:54:57 -0700 (PDT) From: la gleki To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: <20130709144152.GC4227@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <20130709152511.GD9153@mercury.ccil.org> Subject: Re: [bpfk] mabla and zabna by fiat. MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 972099695765 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_287_29714392.1373388897082" X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.1 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / Content-Length: 5765 ------=_Part_287_29714392.1373388897082 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Tuesday, July 9, 2013 8:23:24 PM UTC+4, xorxes wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 12:25 PM, John Cowan > > wrote: > >> >> I can live with it, provided someone puts in a lujvo (probably involving >> mabla and cusku, but not just malsku) that means "x1 curses at x2 using >> form of expression x3", because right now that is termabla, and we >> need such a word. > > > I'm not sure that's what "termabla" has to mean with the old definition > though. It's more like "x1 uses word/expression x2 with derogatory > connotation/sense x3". The x2 of old mabla seems to be a word or > expression, not a person. At least in the first definition "x1 is a > derogative connotation/sense of x2 used by x3". In the second definition " > x3 derogates/'curses at' x2 in form x1", x2 does become a person (or a > thing I suppose), but it's hard to reconcile it with the first. > > As for "x1 curses at x2", we have "dapma". > What is the brivla equivalent of {di'ai} ? toldapma? For general use of foul language, we could use "malbaupli" (this need not > be directed at anyone in particular) or "malbausku". > > > >> Ditto for zabna, of course. The reason not to use >> malsku is that it would mean "shittily express" rather than "talk shit >> to". >> > > It depends on how the lujvo is defined. "Shittily say" would be "ko'a > mabla lo ka ce'u cusku", while "say shit" would be "ko'a cusku lo mabla". > I'm not sure "talk shit to" is the same as "curse at" though. There's also > possibly "malski" for "skicu fo lo ka mabla" Also "te malcme" for name > calling. > > mu'o mi'e xorxes > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. ------=_Part_287_29714392.1373388897082 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tuesday, July 9, 2013 8:23:24 PM UTC+4, xorxes wrote:

On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 12:25 PM, John Cowan &= lt;co...@mercury.ccil.org> wrote:

I can live with it, provided someone puts in a lujvo (probably involv= ing
mabla and cusku, but not just malsku) that means "x1 curses at x2 using
form of expression x3", because right now that is termabla, and we
need such a word.

I'm not sure that's what= "termabla" has to mean with the old definition though. It's more like "x1 = uses word/expression x2 with derogatory connotation/sense x3". The x2 of ol= d mabla seems to be a word or expression, not a person. At least in the fir= st definition "x1 is a derogative connotat= ion/sense of x2 used by x3". In the second definition "x3 derog= ates/'curses at' x2 in form x1", x2 does become a person (or a thing I supp= ose), but it's hard to reconcile it with the first.

As for "x1 curses at x2", we have "dapma".
<= /div>

What is the brivla equivalent o= f {di'ai} ? toldapma?

For gene= ral use of foul language, we could use "malbaupli" (this need not be direct= ed at anyone in particular) or "malbausku". 

 
 Ditto for zabna, of = course.  The reason not to use
malsku is that it would mean "shittily express" rather than "talk shit to".=

It depends on how the lujvo is defined= . "Shittily say" would be "ko'a mabla lo ka ce'u cusku", while "say shit" w= ould be "ko'a cusku lo mabla". I'm not sure "talk shit to" is the same as "= curse at" though. There's also possibly "malski" for "skicu fo lo ka mabla"= Also "te malcme" for name calling.

mu'o mi'e xorxes
 

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at ht= tp://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 
------=_Part_287_29714392.1373388897082--