Received: from mail-wi0-f189.google.com ([209.85.212.189]:59035)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.80.1)
	(envelope-from <bpfk-list+bncBDNZFNNFVAHRBY6Z7CNQKGQEQJNMZSQ@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1WnWKx-0001vS-3F; Thu, 22 May 2014 09:59:29 -0700
Received: by mail-wi0-f189.google.com with SMTP id cc10sf384816wib.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Thu, 22 May 2014 09:59:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
         :in-reply-to:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results
         :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help
         :list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=EoiwKKsUvKb1TYkaJg3PynmekyNwPz0lRCIleTogaQg=;
        b=ZAGzoHfGcR01LyWFeYMjyixZi3b8DELNLckTHTa4T95PjaKs2sX07yLKXYxsKxgF/b
         CsxKeRpPKbtapwBMxQF6/tGB6nQwN0atwZTj20wuBXw/YtD5zfk8aTW78iwiE8zQa4Qu
         7IqGyuUac3z6AoKBSgvz0r3ETluTdWfhS/nVvACxTw7y7JzSxrBMvLCEqcv9LceicCXf
         /EOSUMevBQNdCZnaF6sE7P3RQ5mqVYu43fUlVy9QL/QO5jc/MpOd5x5mJQBM/RgjVWBc
         7DbUpcIJ+7mkY/AwVNAuJJu8vfmJo5OSz25tR9l0CsmVr0kRE+TmXUCF1h3TJHglwVHq
         U2kw==
X-Received: by 10.152.2.228 with SMTP id 4mr16269lax.37.1400777955841;
        Thu, 22 May 2014 09:59:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.152.2.37 with SMTP id 5ls232427lar.73.gmail; Thu, 22 May 2014
 09:59:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.112.49.229 with SMTP id x5mr440826lbn.14.1400777955505;
        Thu, 22 May 2014 09:59:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wg0-x230.google.com (mail-wg0-x230.google.com [2a00:1450:400c:c00::230])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s1si45261wiw.3.2014.05.22.09.59.15
        for <bpfk-list@googlegroups.com>
        (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
        Thu, 22 May 2014 09:59:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of and.rosta@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c00::230 as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:400c:c00::230;
Received: by mail-wg0-f48.google.com with SMTP id b13so3610658wgh.31
        for <bpfk-list@googlegroups.com>; Thu, 22 May 2014 09:59:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.180.96.225 with SMTP id dv1mr17636644wib.37.1400777955396;
        Thu, 22 May 2014 09:59:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.208] ([2.31.155.129])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id w6sm447088wjq.29.2014.05.22.09.59.13
        for <multiple recipients>
        (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
        Thu, 22 May 2014 09:59:14 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <537E2CF4.3020000@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 17:59:32 +0100
From: And Rosta <and.rosta@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120711 Thunderbird/14.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [bpfk] Vote proxying?
References: <CACf3dPkGGTvibA89Q1epNdVQnqmggo4Gzw1py0pCxv=XAOFgpg@mail.gmail.com> <CACf3dPn8hwqc3biqYicTyjUFMaVZ0e2jOf5YeFOJ-084Bog+Ag@mail.gmail.com> <20140520164001.GC9283@mercury.ccil.org>
In-Reply-To: <20140520164001.GC9283@mercury.ccil.org>
X-Original-Sender: and.rosta@gmail.com
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com;       spf=pass
 (google.com: domain of and.rosta@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c00::230
 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=and.rosta@gmail.com;       dkim=pass
 header.i=@gmail.com;       dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com
Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <bpfk-list.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 972099695765
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/post>, <mailto:bpfk-list@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/>, <mailto:bpfk-list+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list>
Sender: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/subscribe>, <mailto:bpfk-list+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/subscribe>, <mailto:googlegroups-manage+972099695765+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam_score: 0.0
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /
Content-Length: 1342

John Cowan, On 20/05/2014 17:40:
>> Is it legitimate to proxy one's vote on bpfk matters?
>
> The LLG has traditionally accepted them, and the BPFK is a committee
> of the LLG, formally speaking, so I see no reason why not.
>
> John Cowan, LLG parliamentarian

In that case, I proxy mine to Xorxes. Experience has shown me that even in =
the rare cases where I don't agree with him from the outset, I soon come to=
 realize that he was right after all.

I'd also like to point out that if enough bpfk members did likewise, the bp=
fk business could be zipped through without unnecessary delay and debate. E=
ither decisions could simply be referred to Xorxes or else we could calcula=
te how many Nays it takes to block a consensus and begin by counting contra=
xorxesian votes; only if there were sufficient contraxorxesian votes to blo=
ck a consensus would it be necessary to struggle to find some other solutio=
n.

--And.
 =20

--=20
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "=
BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e=
mail to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.