Received: from mail-la0-f59.google.com ([209.85.215.59]:58557)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.80.1)
	(envelope-from <bpfk-list+bncBC65FOEL4UJRBBP4SGOAKGQEDVIPIXQ@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1WpG29-0003QW-98; Tue, 27 May 2014 04:59:23 -0700
Received: by mail-la0-f59.google.com with SMTP id pv20sf678250lab.14
        for <multiple recipients>; Tue, 27 May 2014 04:59:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
         :in-reply-to:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results
         :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help
         :list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type;
        bh=p7WpLc/tA0dhKLyd5JaC0rEH5hCcEmafQPd5vvpVydI=;
        b=y6tqKBwj1iSI0CMzHRE5bEv3X2r9MEl0zINR5spDD3y5cXVqtuv4IfAfj80vyRDW+5
         A2hu0oGy7qOETpjZfXTzcWTgGNNGrQVOPcS2PgiqLNDZlUWFTezSmTrkhLOob7Q2ONAP
         A/yuyqgO7gxziMh4i7CncoUZm/BB8zMJicFp7t7bwKISX9T4NxM2pWAFK/fDpRBl36rz
         Bwwrk+l+AoiT9V1o5C8STtmqjfcKe+AxXlSBZqyUoAt88P8W5YWtMIpTcNoxOfToGa5D
         nwAYOKCxeTAmXlEiWXmxGtJ1OpRsxO3BElAr2Gmt6Z4N8UIV5uE/zOxcks/bp/XcCszz
         d5Iw==
X-Received: by 10.152.36.100 with SMTP id p4mr12682laj.14.1401191941280;
        Tue, 27 May 2014 04:59:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.152.36.227 with SMTP id t3ls504142laj.11.gmail; Tue, 27 May
 2014 04:59:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.152.21.133 with SMTP id v5mr243294lae.9.1401191940967;
        Tue, 27 May 2014 04:59:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net. [212.227.17.20])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r49si5206605eep.0.2014.05.27.04.59.00
        for <bpfk-list@googlegroups.com>
        (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
        Tue, 27 May 2014 04:59:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of seladwa@gmx.de designates 212.227.17.20 as permitted sender) client-ip=212.227.17.20;
Received: from [192.168.2.108] ([93.220.120.211]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002)
 with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MRGPP-1XHSpv2QCl-00UYzR for
 <bpfk-list@googlegroups.com>; Tue, 27 May 2014 13:59:00 +0200
Message-ID: <53847E05.1000107@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 13:59:01 +0200
From: selpa'i <seladwa@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [bpfk] Finishing the BPFK sections
References: <5383A193.3010907@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <5383A193.3010907@gmx.de>
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:a5BDkJYKpDgzP16B7boeWj9XCYsFohPPHLeyGRIAVt2HeMS0coJ
 2FZ4y8/qq6sWHakFJ3bnkPPupAE+0qKvMV10agy9FuCd0vgJr8aECy51wL7POpU9kd7Nu8P
 CcFRLMOEejuEnJdyXb5gIkpNY0l2qg+d/zt3m6H9B5B8j0By+/gP/b46QUBFtEbZCJj94nZ
 QnDyfj0RfuF0FJEIp3Kpg==
X-Original-Sender: seladwa@gmx.de
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com;       spf=pass
 (google.com: domain of seladwa@gmx.de designates 212.227.17.20 as permitted
 sender) smtp.mail=seladwa@gmx.de
Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <bpfk-list.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 972099695765
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/post>, <mailto:bpfk-list@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/>, <mailto:bpfk-list+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list>
Sender: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/subscribe>, <mailto:bpfk-list+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/subscribe>, <mailto:googlegroups-manage+972099695765+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam_score: 0.0
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /
Content-Length: 1584

coi

I have finished the spatial tense sections (at least to a point where I 
think they are ready for a vote). Even though some were marked blue, 
they still contained mistakes and formatting problems. Most of those 
should be fixed now.

I notice that the way definitions are phrased differs between sections. 
Is this a problem? Should they rather match?

In any case, let's please vote on the entire supersection of spatial 
tenses (with one vote per section). I'll add polls to the pages. How 
long does the vote last? I suggest 1 week. (btw, if nobody is interested 
in voting any longer, then better to say so right away)

Also, in the case of non-contact spatial tenses, there is a slight 
conflict with {ru'u}. The rough definition in terms of {fi'o se sruri} 
doesn't explain how usages like {la .alis. cu ru'u limna} or {lo prenu 
cu ru'u catlu} work. I added a comment on the page which contains two 
possible explanations. This is a good example of usage doing one thing, 
and the ma'oste/CLL doing another, or rather, usage bending the meaning 
of a word to make it more useful in real life. But the BPFK still needs 
to decide what it means.

mi'e la selpa'i mu'o


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.