Received: from mail-ig0-f191.google.com ([209.85.213.191]:39968) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1WpUx4-0001wI-PX; Tue, 27 May 2014 20:55:02 -0700 Received: by mail-ig0-f191.google.com with SMTP id c1sf201698igq.18 for ; Tue, 27 May 2014 20:54:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=0P3dySz8POYBkGitS0hGpwLZGh1geI6vHvoKh0SogBE=; b=tKzVTk7E4Ru1ytfcAEQADtOASIoASHdf6hf3E4uRYv/1xrXE99g4emFIPqss55Sd5C iPD+X1UlfpDPd3EGjjaN/ZraQg0GRtzOtbk1fcXp0HnhIQw+2kZ7xQN+Geo7ZZNbCsQR O27/4SOIKa+MjopWZVnSqgZb6d2kb0DPca1ykoHSXEJHntitqKrDzDEtXx5glCbVF8vi NEUPATyXL7TvqoxOXnaBt21IVBW4FvGa5koWkeP1cr+rYdeFvxbz5sNQkbUahOXprAfz bCG1/7qZhg7McGamiA3Gx1IEC79dh6tdtXRo3Ty/aJnISBAXOAMYJejVqF1suR4N1ooz ziEQ== X-Received: by 10.182.247.2 with SMTP id ya2mr67864obc.20.1401225267941; Tue, 27 May 2014 14:14:27 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.182.138.69 with SMTP id qo5ls1113624obb.34.gmail; Tue, 27 May 2014 14:14:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.182.3.6 with SMTP id 6mr15015198oby.2.1401225267602; Tue, 27 May 2014 14:14:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ve0-x22b.google.com (mail-ve0-x22b.google.com [2607:f8b0:400c:c01::22b]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id xn6si988120vdc.2.2014.05.27.14.14.27 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 27 May 2014 14:14:27 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400c:c01::22b as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:400c:c01::22b; Received: by mail-ve0-f171.google.com with SMTP id oz11so11333638veb.2 for ; Tue, 27 May 2014 14:14:27 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.52.147.200 with SMTP id tm8mr3472591vdb.54.1401225267446; Tue, 27 May 2014 14:14:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.170.73 with HTTP; Tue, 27 May 2014 14:14:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <53847E05.1000107@gmx.de> References: <5383A193.3010907@gmx.de> <53847E05.1000107@gmx.de> Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 18:14:27 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [bpfk] Finishing the BPFK sections From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jorge_Llamb=C3=ADas?= To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400c:c01::22b as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 972099695765 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec52e642b510aa904fa682e99 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / Content-Length: 6378 --bcaec52e642b510aa904fa682e99 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 8:59 AM, selpa'i wrote: > coi > > I have finished the spatial tense sections (at least to a point where I > think they are ready for a vote). Even though some were marked blue, they > still contained mistakes and formatting problems. Most of those should be > fixed now. > ui I notice that the way definitions are phrased differs between sections. Is > this a problem? Should they rather match? > Ideally they should be as homogeneous as possible, but since they are from so many different authors it's no surprise that there are variations. In any case, let's please vote on the entire supersection of spatial tenses > (with one vote per section). I'll add polls to the pages. How long does the > vote last? I suggest 1 week. (btw, if nobody is interested in voting any > longer, then better to say so right away) > lojban.org seems to be down at the moment, but I'll go vote when it's up again. Also, in the case of non-contact spatial tenses, there is a slight conflict > with {ru'u}. The rough definition in terms of {fi'o se sruri} doesn't > explain how usages like {la .alis. cu ru'u limna} or {lo prenu cu ru'u > catlu} work. I added a comment on the page which contains two possible > explanations. This is a good example of usage doing one thing, and the > ma'oste/CLL doing another, or rather, usage bending the meaning of a word > to make it more useful in real life. But the BPFK still needs to decide > what it means. I haven't had a chance to read your possible explanations yet, but I do interpret those two as "fi'o se sruri". "lo nu la .alis cu limna cu sruri zo'e" and "lo nu lo prenu cu catlu cu sruri zo'e". The event of swimming / event of looking takes place around some undetermined point. The spatial location of a swimming event is more or less clear. The spatial location of a looking event is not so clear, but presumably it includes the locations of the looker and the lookee, and possibly the space in between. mu'o mi'e xorxes -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --bcaec52e642b510aa904fa682e99 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

= On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 8:59 AM, selpa'i <seladwa@gmx.de> = wrote:
coi

I have finished the spatial tense sections (at least to a point where I thi= nk they are ready for a vote). Even though some were marked blue, they stil= l contained mistakes and formatting problems. Most of those should be fixed= now.

ui=C2=A0

I notice that the way definitions are phrased differs between sections. Is = this a problem? Should they rather match?

Ideally they should be as homogeneous as possible, but since they are fr= om so many different authors it's no surprise that there are variations= .=C2=A0

In any case, let's please vote on the entire supersection of spatial te= nses (with one vote per section). I'll add polls to the pages. How long= does the vote last? I suggest 1 week. (btw, if nobody is interested in vot= ing any longer, then better to say so right away)


Also, in the case of non-contact spatial tenses, there is a slight conflict= with {ru'u}. The rough definition in terms of {fi'o se sruri} does= n't explain how usages like {la .alis. cu ru'u limna} or {lo prenu = cu ru'u catlu} work. I added a comment on the page which contains two p= ossible explanations. This is a good example of usage doing one thing, and = the ma'oste/CLL doing another, or rather, usage bending the meaning of = a word to make it more useful in real life. But the BPFK still needs to dec= ide what it means.

I haven't had a chance to read your possible explan= ations yet, but I do interpret those two as "fi'o se sruri". = "lo nu la .alis cu limna cu sruri zo'e" and "lo nu lo pr= enu cu catlu cu sruri zo'e". The event of swimming / event of look= ing takes place around some undetermined point. The spatial location of a s= wimming event is more or less clear. The spatial location of a looking even= t is not so clear, but presumably it includes the locations of the looker a= nd the lookee, and possibly the space in between.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to
bpfk-list= +unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at ht= tp://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--bcaec52e642b510aa904fa682e99--