Received: from mail-wg0-f59.google.com ([74.125.82.59]:44828) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1WpU8b-00017v-1L; Tue, 27 May 2014 20:02:55 -0700 Received: by mail-wg0-f59.google.com with SMTP id x12sf972464wgg.4 for ; Tue, 27 May 2014 20:02:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help :list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=BujBQuz2QW1sVJqNzcxqNmru+jKRxKQbq78LzWVf0As=; b=JmxW/eakHG1tJL+x/y2V4fCqeZ7/p9V/0fWOWONnjKSbwAxgEcS6tNLu5qHEKO8Ls/ 9Vg+CM3ebmlFVhHsaxuCm1oq0F3OMxZn2b9Jwi2Z+xQ4USgASXgvFIdUM3QWlaWQH3+N T3S8EpkDWVGayLw4Dm4TZ6JHyeWcFBpFxLEwfr0qCvykms8bZe9MbA+FqMReaecAMaaV wWOv/1n1mdPEqKVD2Mpb4zHArPn/I5dGzh5wASyLMcIa+DKXJ7FZTHwOm6q6jW/x1TH+ 81CcljGG1ucVubhTgbqVu6AnGFCvdGA4tB3Ve7dy7+U6e52BUVFydLgMvUC/nfKlAlzh G/FQ== X-Received: by 10.152.28.229 with SMTP id e5mr42002lah.27.1401229242392; Tue, 27 May 2014 15:20:42 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.152.30.73 with SMTP id q9ls543009lah.23.gmail; Tue, 27 May 2014 15:20:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.112.54.169 with SMTP id k9mr3064310lbp.1.1401229241974; Tue, 27 May 2014 15:20:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net. [212.227.17.22]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g42si5718104eev.1.2014.05.27.15.20.41 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 27 May 2014 15:20:41 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of seladwa@gmx.de designates 212.227.17.22 as permitted sender) client-ip=212.227.17.22; Received: from [192.168.2.108] ([93.220.120.211]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LoVvG-1WNVdD1vys-00gUAx for ; Wed, 28 May 2014 00:20:41 +0200 Message-ID: <53850FBA.50309@gmx.de> Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 00:20:42 +0200 From: selpa'i User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [bpfk] Finishing the BPFK sections References: <5383A193.3010907@gmx.de> <53847E05.1000107@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:6cRn+GOg8sKTEkDVKhVduOONPFaMZYtt23ne2XMLq8cDl9QPqDc aNwnaG8sOefNMP0AHuPlwQ0I6n3oRrTQ+jgtO37Z1p691etsonNHjiwk7+trqLUtKCF8GLu RfAaEZNoNovKtw9MHuqVJlHMvXtL7oCo1txnwmhfvzQlYHeqZVAH3C99EMubZ+B9YdnFMAE YJb125/vN44CZ4cfmz7mA== X-Original-Sender: seladwa@gmx.de X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of seladwa@gmx.de designates 212.227.17.22 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=seladwa@gmx.de Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 972099695765 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / Content-Length: 2337 la .xorxes. cu cusku di'e > On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 8:59 AM, selpa'i > wrote: > I notice that the way definitions are phrased differs between > sections. Is this a problem? Should they rather match? > > > Ideally they should be as homogeneous as possible, but since they are > from so many different authors it's no surprise that there are variations. I did try to make them at least a little bit more homogeneous. We'll see. > > In any case, let's please vote on the entire supersection of spatial > tenses (with one vote per section). I'll add polls to the pages. How > long does the vote last? I suggest 1 week. (btw, if nobody is > interested in voting any longer, then better to say so right away) > > > lojban.org seems to be down at the moment, but I'll > go vote when it's up again. That's great. Sadly, since it's already midnight now I'll have to wait until tomorrow before I can add the polls. > I haven't had a chance to read your possible explanations yet, but I do > interpret those two as "fi'o se sruri". "lo nu la .alis cu limna cu > sruri zo'e" and "lo nu lo prenu cu catlu cu sruri zo'e". The event of > swimming / event of looking takes place around some undetermined point. > The spatial location of a swimming event is more or less clear. The > spatial location of a looking event is not so clear, but presumably it > includes the locations of the looker and the lookee, and possibly the > space in between. Yes, that's how it tends to work for FAhA. The question is just in what way "looking" can surround anything. I'd say it could work if the point of the "looker" is surrounded by a circle of the things being looked at. Another question on the page is what portion of a "circle" is needed around a thing for it to count as being surrounded. Let's hope that lojban.org comes back up soon. mi'e la selpa'i mu'o -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.