Received: from mail-yh0-f55.google.com ([209.85.213.55]:36669) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1Wpgdc-0003Zk-6t; Wed, 28 May 2014 09:23:47 -0700 Received: by mail-yh0-f55.google.com with SMTP id b6sf3192822yha.10 for ; Wed, 28 May 2014 09:23:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=tyDBLhAQscNR7P4SOVBb1xlSUuuG8bBEub1SMLjDhZo=; b=k5QjrxFGVClIQIqhhnCuZYXBmRjiHK0xD658Uki1IsKLgItP9ot/8GerYbtuSt0w8N VlF4YvFXM1fGxHyHM0oIZrqc1dqFv4CFbotFaCXNcW/ZCrcu+nultkDwC+qVVhBaA72H AG8lVcBHEf0/RwIMb9+ILFyk1RHC5NMRnlKrncfEISOr+DT+Y9SE8Snz+r1Dsr8dK1HJ ldM810j70D8Z6yrpjilXuAkhwkYEvSPC4bbzU68fftWt7dOsM454z5W0mo/azQAQaTtF J4+UXmczMQObNq4uJIMzL4NT4TqemOOQA13gSppmHG5DBV1fAoJOYvyyjjTX11Yj7J+Q N3rw== X-Received: by 10.50.142.104 with SMTP id rv8mr342085igb.13.1401294209808; Wed, 28 May 2014 09:23:29 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.50.73.229 with SMTP id o5ls2868833igv.21.canary; Wed, 28 May 2014 09:23:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.66.156.2 with SMTP id wa2mr325442pab.0.1401294209515; Wed, 28 May 2014 09:23:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-vc0-x22f.google.com (mail-vc0-x22f.google.com [2607:f8b0:400c:c03::22f]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l7si13858vda.3.2014.05.28.09.23.29 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 28 May 2014 09:23:29 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of adamlopresto@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400c:c03::22f as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:400c:c03::22f; Received: by mail-vc0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id id10so569117vcb.34 for ; Wed, 28 May 2014 09:23:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.58.116.207 with SMTP id jy15mr845120veb.72.1401294209370; Wed, 28 May 2014 09:23:29 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.58.58.10 with HTTP; Wed, 28 May 2014 09:23:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5385B6C9.7080202@gmx.de> References: <5383A193.3010907@gmx.de> <53847E05.1000107@gmx.de> <53850FBA.50309@gmx.de> <5385B1E2.4000409@gmx.de> <5385B6C9.7080202@gmx.de> From: Adam Lopresto Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 11:23:09 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [bpfk] Finishing the BPFK sections To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: adamlopresto@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of adamlopresto@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400c:c03::22f as permitted sender) smtp.mail=adamlopresto@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 972099695765 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b6da35e93533d04fa783b26 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / Content-Length: 6066 --047d7b6da35e93533d04fa783b26 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I'd like to see some of the Non-Contact Spatials spelled out a little more clearly. In particular, I think the intention is that {ri'u ko'a broda} assumes that {ko'a} has an orientation, and that the event of {broda}-ing is to {ko'a}'s right, and that the speaker's location and orientation are irrelevant, but that point is not entirely clear from the definition as stated. If I'm facing north and you're to the north of me, facing south back at me, then a dog between us to the east is "to the right of you" from my point of view, but also "to your left". .i gerku ri'u je'i zu'a do Same question for {ca'u} and {ti'a}. "In front of X" can mean "between me and X" ("a shadow passed in front of the moon"), or it could mean "in the direction that X is facing". Both should be expressible, and the definitions need to be unambiguously one or the other. On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 5:13 AM, selpa'i wrote: > mi cusku di'e > >> Happy voting! >> > > By the way, I think the only debatable point in all those sections is the > cmavo {ne'a}, which has two popular meanings/uses. Those meanings are {fi'o > se zvajbi} i.e. "near/in the vicinity of", and {fi'o se mlana} "on the side > of". The former is compatible with the latter, but not vice-versa. > > Some corpus examples: > > http://corpus.lojban.org/corpus/search/ne%27a > > > mi'e la selpa'i mu'o > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "BPFK" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --047d7b6da35e93533d04fa783b26 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I'd like to see some of the Non-Contact Spatials spell= ed out a little more clearly. In particular, I think the intention is that = {ri'u ko'a broda} assumes that {ko'a} has an orientation, and t= hat the event of {broda}-ing is to {ko'a}'s right, and that the spe= aker's location and orientation are irrelevant, but that point is not e= ntirely clear from the definition as stated. If I'm facing north and yo= u're to the north of me, facing south back at me, then a dog between us= to the east is "to the right of you" from my point of view, but = also "to your left". .i gerku ri'u je'i zu'a do

Same question for {ca'u} and {ti'a}. "In front = of X" can mean "between me and X" ("a shadow passed in = front of the moon"), or it could mean "in the direction that X is= facing". Both should be expressible, and the definitions need to be u= nambiguously one or the other.=C2=A0


On Wed,= May 28, 2014 at 5:13 AM, selpa'i <seladwa@gmx.de> wrote:
mi cusku di'e
Happy voting!

By the way, I think the only debatable point in all those sections is the c= mavo {ne'a}, which has two popular meanings/uses. Those meanings are {f= i'o se zvajbi} i.e. "near/in the vicinity of", and {fi'o = se mlana} "on the side of". The former is compatible with the lat= ter, but not vice-versa.

Some corpus examples:

http://corpus.lojban.org/corpus/search/ne%27a


mi'e la selpa'i mu'o

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to bpfk-list= +unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at ht= tp://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--047d7b6da35e93533d04fa783b26--