Received: from mail-yh0-f61.google.com ([209.85.213.61]:56760) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1WxnrR-0000j9-R5; Thu, 19 Jun 2014 18:43:39 -0700 Received: by mail-yh0-f61.google.com with SMTP id v1sf703635yhn.16 for ; Thu, 19 Jun 2014 18:43:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=YPNSfhGcW0YV0Tss2qw0XENDIjyqjWKdLm4oLZWYDpc=; b=Pa4e/BG595zSdmvXbwB4uIIqBAYEtyt0ebcYRYLYQK+EAut4guTgDNEmNjJBGs5fYh S6wOa6hsRZtCfgcid+jMnliDIIddNIlegQnkmiXeEAhI1w1CPMbMpgEHo7PcBOdwfgGi akR544K1bzINKBMoAOLRJcJkTSqrNTCYawf9lxUNiIL93dM3g1FJ8UBweoD564rIu9jf kGd6VMVdxzFvZUZlP5hS6tavJs3pvrZ+b8ZAT+KZSSLDuVKbYF75PcyHQvPbbmCsmpia onw8EZunvM1dHX/liu2y/pPU5j5EaW/2wZ2r5IXKYGjvZlQSGzeGY2J8liAQykitb0ZZ 17eg== X-Received: by 10.50.112.36 with SMTP id in4mr5613igb.7.1403228599437; Thu, 19 Jun 2014 18:43:19 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.50.36.5 with SMTP id m5ls7736igj.20.canary; Thu, 19 Jun 2014 18:43:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.66.228.162 with SMTP id sj2mr143870pac.11.1403228599273; Thu, 19 Jun 2014 18:43:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-vc0-x22e.google.com (mail-vc0-x22e.google.com [2607:f8b0:400c:c03::22e]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id pr8si315066vdb.1.2014.06.19.18.43.19 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 19 Jun 2014 18:43:19 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400c:c03::22e as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:400c:c03::22e; Received: by mail-vc0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id hy4so2937319vcb.5 for ; Thu, 19 Jun 2014 18:43:19 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.52.6.227 with SMTP id e3mr133338vda.10.1403228599132; Thu, 19 Jun 2014 18:43:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.170.73 with HTTP; Thu, 19 Jun 2014 18:43:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20140620010120.GI24620@mercury.ccil.org> References: <53850FBA.50309@gmx.de> <5385B1E2.4000409@gmx.de> <5385B6C9.7080202@gmx.de> <20140618231316.GB856@mercury.ccil.org> <20140619235321.GF24620@mercury.ccil.org> <20140620010120.GI24620@mercury.ccil.org> Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 22:43:19 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [bpfk] Finishing the BPFK sections From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jorge_Llamb=C3=ADas?= To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400c:c03::22e as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 972099695765 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf3030c34730a92904fc3a9edb X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_bar: - Content-Length: 5547 --20cf3030c34730a92904fc3a9edb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 10:01 PM, John Cowan wrote: > In heraldry, the left side of a shield is > called the dexter (right) side, and the right side is called the > sinister (left) side, because blazonry takes the shield's point of view, > (ultimately that of the wearer) rather than the observer's point of view. > That makes sense, since shields do have an intrinsic front side. > So above/below, in-front-of/behind, and left-of/right-of each follow > > their own slightly different rules. > > Above/below is an absolute (or rather Earth-relative) direction, like > north-south and east-west. But some objects do have an intrinsic up side and bottom side, otherwise nothing could ever be upside down. So in this respect up/down is more like front/back and left/right than like north/south and east/west. > It doesn't fit here at all. I see no reason > why front, back, left, and right should be inconsistent in Lojban just > because they are inconsistent in English. Well, are there any languages that don't work like English in this respect? All the languages I know work the same way, but then they are all closely related languages so that doesn't prove much. The rule may be somewhat complicated but it's consistent across (at least some) languages. If there are languages that work the way you suggest, where to the left of a column that you are facing is to your right, then that rule might have a chance for Lojban, if not, then making up such a rule would probably be hopeless and just a source of confusion. I'm not strongly opposed to such a rule if it's based on something more than an analogy that may be too simplistic. mu'o mi'e xorxes -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --20cf3030c34730a92904fc3a9edb Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

= On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 10:01 PM, John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org= > wrote:
=C2=A0In heraldry, the left side of a shield= is
called the dexter (right) side, and the right side is called the
sinister (left) side, because blazonry takes the shield's point of view= ,
(ultimately that of the wearer) rather than the observer's point of vie= w.

That makes sense, since shields do h= ave an intrinsic front side.=C2=A0

> So above/below, in-front-of/behind, and left-of/right-of each follow > their own slightly different rules.

Above/below is an absolute (or rather Earth-relative) direction, like=
north-south and east-west.

But some object= s do have an intrinsic up side and bottom side, otherwise nothing could eve= r be upside down. So in this respect up/down is more like front/back and le= ft/right than like north/south and east/west.
=C2=A0
=C2=A0It doesn't fit he= re at all. =C2=A0I see no reason
why front, back, left, and right should be inconsistent in Lojban just
because they are inconsistent in English.

W= ell, are there any languages that don't work like English in this respe= ct? All the languages I know work the same way, but then they are all close= ly related languages so that doesn't prove much. The rule may be somewh= at complicated but it's consistent across (at least some) languages. If= there are languages that work the way you suggest, where to the left of a = column that you are facing is to your right, then that rule might have a ch= ance for Lojban, if not, then making up such a rule would probably be hopel= ess and just a source of confusion. I'm not strongly opposed to such a = rule if it's based on something more than an analogy that may be too si= mplistic.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to bpfk-list= +unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at ht= tp://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--20cf3030c34730a92904fc3a9edb--