Received: from mail-we0-f189.google.com ([74.125.82.189]:50810) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1XRLGv-0007Q0-Ue; Tue, 09 Sep 2014 06:15:51 -0700 Received: by mail-we0-f189.google.com with SMTP id u57sf404994wes.26 for ; Tue, 09 Sep 2014 06:15:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=3hhMO3Yi2PisMqh881ET/I+wGfCbn4CGl8ALcKPPym4=; b=sSwK0zidYFKfXbd/J/OIeGofz6j9r7QWBnxMQALnl2jEBVyFfiZDt3kAm7A2nyI1N5 Cy0erghphJwpeZ6uTsZtQMnDtPrcewTxgRM6B8Q3TImFIYMMSlDFWUb6WbyK79KNBhWb /m7JbCE+cxnj04wzq9Ba6lnLdAJj0ZHZ0e7/PbnsJAgx74/JnRwfbZRz3qpo5DDpXRuY 4JxfkFrIgsANHUmwGErYGo8lbiTLCfo9waq2qjPXstajPeMVXgR/qiQ/mla0kc9fh4AP uhA77gLhyRLGMgAU0pB0vojlLdQCeIdPzcU3syW60SABo/SvPZGUgsNSUD4kTt/JbgSh fcAQ== X-Received: by 10.152.27.129 with SMTP id t1mr5370lag.8.1410268542477; Tue, 09 Sep 2014 06:15:42 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.152.43.103 with SMTP id v7ls524854lal.32.gmail; Tue, 09 Sep 2014 06:15:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.152.44.227 with SMTP id h3mr3472625lam.2.1410268541605; Tue, 09 Sep 2014 06:15:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wg0-x231.google.com (mail-wg0-x231.google.com [2a00:1450:400c:c00::231]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id gk5si832622wic.1.2014.09.09.06.15.41 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 09 Sep 2014 06:15:41 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of ilmen.pokebip@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c00::231 as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:400c:c00::231; Received: by mail-wg0-f49.google.com with SMTP id m15so2990293wgh.8 for ; Tue, 09 Sep 2014 06:15:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.99.4 with SMTP id em4mr29877718wib.8.1410268541509; Tue, 09 Sep 2014 06:15:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.102] (95-210-209-219.ip.skylogicnet.com. [95.210.209.219]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id wm8sm14868039wjb.40.2014.09.09.06.15.36 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 09 Sep 2014 06:15:40 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <540EFD66.2080509@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2014 15:15:18 +0200 From: Ilmen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Subject: [bpfk] {gunma}, {selcmi} and gadri definitions X-Original-Sender: ilmen.pokebip@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of ilmen.pokebip@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c00::231 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=ilmen.pokebip@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 972099695765 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------050906060604040101090207" X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_bar: - Content-Length: 8451 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------050906060604040101090207 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable coi me BPFK Below are the formal definitions of the {l=E2=80=A2i}/{l=E2=80=A2'i} gadri,= as they can=20 be found on the BPFK gadri page=20 : loi [PA] broda lo gunma be lo [PA] broda lei [PA] broda lo gunma be le [PA] broda lai [PA] broda lo gunma be la [PA] broda loi PA sumti lo gunma be lo PA /sumti/ lei PA sumti lo gunma be le PA /sumti/ lai PA sumti lo gunma be la PA /sumti/ lo'i [PA] broda lo selcmi be lo [PA] broda le'i [PA] broda lo selcmi be le [PA] broda la'i [PA] broda lo selcmi be la [PA] broda lo'i PA sumti lo selcmi be lo PA /sumti/ le'i PA sumti lo selcmi be le PA /sumti/ la'i PA sumti lo selcmi be la PA /sumti/ Now, here is a quote from "gadri: an unofficial commentary from a=20 logical point of view", section 3=20 : According to jbovlaste ,=20 {selcmi} is defined as follows: x1 selcmi x2 =3Dca'e x1 se cmima ro lo me x2 me'u e no lo na= =20 me x2 If we accept this definition, a set referred to by=20 {lo'i/le'i/la'i}-sumti consists of only the referent of {lo/le/la [PA]=20 broda} or {lo/le/la PA sumti}. Contrastively, if we define it as=20 {selcmi}=3D{se cmima}, the set may include what is/are other than the=20 referent of {lo/le/la [PA] broda} or {lo/le/la PA sumti}. It is not yet=20 officially determined which interpretation is to be accepted.// As far as I know, gunma2 and cmima1 are non-exhaustive, in other words=20 they do not necessarily show all the members of gunma1 and cmima2=20 respectively. (Correct me if I'm wrong!) I don't like very much the idea of using the sel- rafsi in a=20 non-compositional way, for making lujvo of the form {selbroda} whose=20 meaning cannot be derived from {se broda}. It seems there's a pretty=20 wide implicit agreement that the sel/ter/vel/xel rafsi should be regular=20 (semantically compositional). So, I think the BPFK should make an official decision on whether {loi=20 broda}/{lo'i broda} might include things that do not broda among their=20 referents, and clarify the formal definitions accordingly if necessary. I would expect them to never include things that do not broda. If so,=20 the definition should probably be modified as shown below: =E2=80=A2 loi [PA] broda =3D lo gunma be lo [PA] broda .e no drata be ri =E2=80=A2 lo'i [PA] broda =3D lo se cmima be lo [PA] broda .e no drata be= ri What do you think? mu'o mi'e la .ilmen. --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= BPFK" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --------------050906060604040101090207 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable coi me BPFK

Below are the formal definitions of the {l=E2=80=A2i}/{l=E2=80=A2'i} ga= dri, as they can be found on the BPFK gadri page:

loi [PA] broda =C2=A0= =C2=A0 =C2=A0 lo gunma be lo [PA] broda
lei [PA] broda =C2=A0=C2=A0 =C2=A0 lo gunma be le [PA] broda<= br> lai [PA] broda =C2=A0=C2=A0 =C2=A0 lo gunma be la [PA] broda<= br> loi PA sumti =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0=C2=A0 lo gunma be lo PA = sumti
lei PA sumti =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0=C2=A0 lo gunma be le PA = sumti
lai PA sumti =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0=C2=A0 lo gunma be la PA = sumti

lo'i [PA] broda =C2=A0=C2=A0 =C2=A0lo selcmi be lo [PA] broda=
le'i [PA] broda =C2=A0=C2=A0 =C2=A0lo selcmi be le [PA] broda=
la'i [PA] broda =C2=A0=C2=A0 =C2=A0lo selcmi be la [PA] broda=
lo'i PA sumti =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 lo selcmi be lo PA sumt= i
le'i PA sumti =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 lo selcmi be le PA sumt= i
la'i PA sumti =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 lo selcmi be la PA sumt= i


Now, here is a quote from "gadri: an unofficial commentary from a logical point of view", section 3= :

According to jbovlaste, {selcmi} is defined as follows:

x1 selcmi x2 =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 =C2=A0=C2=A0 =3Dca'e =C2=A0=C2= =A0=C2=A0 =C2=A0=C2=A0 x1 se cmima ro lo me x2 me'u e no lo na me x2

If we accept this definition, a set referred to by {lo'i/le'i/la'i}-sumti consists of only the referent of {lo/le/la [PA] broda} or {lo/le/la PA sumti}. Contrastively, if we define it as {selcmi}=3D{se cmima}, the set may include what is/are other than the referent of {lo/le/la [PA] broda} or {lo/le/la PA sumti}. It is not yet officially determined which interpretation is to be accepted.


As far as I know, gunma2 and cmima1 are non-exhaustive, in other words they do not necessarily show all the members of gunma1 and cmima2 respectively. (Correct me if I'm wrong!)

I don't like very much the idea of using the sel- rafsi in a non-compositional way, for making lujvo of the form {selbroda} whose meaning cannot be derived from {se broda}. It seems there's a pretty wide implicit agreement that the sel/ter/vel/xel rafsi should be regular (semantically compositional).

So, I think the BPFK should make an official decision on whether {loi broda}/{lo'i broda} might include things that do not broda among their referents, and clarify the formal definitions accordingly if necessary.

I would expect them to never include things that do not broda. If so, the definition should probably be modified as shown below:

=E2=80=A2 loi [PA] broda=C2=A0 =3D=C2=A0 lo gunma be lo [PA] broda .e n= o drata be ri
=E2=80=A2 lo'i [PA] broda=C2=A0 =3D=C2=A0 lo se cmima be lo [PA] broda = .e no drata be ri

What do you think?

mu'o mi'e la .ilmen.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to bpfk-list= +unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at ht= tp://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--------------050906060604040101090207--