Received: from mail-wg0-f60.google.com ([74.125.82.60]:36486) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1XgMoS-0004xV-I7; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 16:56:40 -0700 Received: by mail-wg0-f60.google.com with SMTP id z12sf13085wgg.5 for ; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 16:56:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=bf11LUgD+kQ6x+ocJPvSgi7bSaj/2/Ct8VaroCTYc6o=; b=wY7qQB+giF9Br0d6ZDLDyaT+f7QcViL3tm5Gs4+FjZ0yS2gr3XBNrZmYP7c56YvmSi 673aroJIG1XnA2RK44Fj61zCocmIUdcx/3hO9e/8VwubOvV8ip+09TkC5Gqnw3/VuZ2M VMtKzGSlhD2Y7yCyAhTUy17SJvodX0IgMNkgZHQn0yRibTLH2uQj+ZD4qqPPrR97lfHv jRwF8UDBOyvllzl1rHh6rezESijJJwPX0AtDlJ46fejbvUl2qQn3B2SMLawJyHC/g1zM vzqhc+PqaOwoPB52QkpaOgyZa3RRSISI4tXNFFn6iEti686zuSB0o8WrAiUbkEGHufXG 93WA== X-Received: by 10.152.4.226 with SMTP id n2mr30950lan.19.1413849385357; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 16:56:25 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.152.87.4 with SMTP id t4ls1973laz.33.gmail; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 16:56:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.152.27.38 with SMTP id q6mr33844lag.5.1413849384597; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 16:56:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wi0-x230.google.com (mail-wi0-x230.google.com. [2a00:1450:400c:c05::230]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id gk3si467042wib.1.2014.10.20.16.56.24 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 20 Oct 2014 16:56:24 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c05::230 as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:400c:c05::230; Received: by mail-wi0-f176.google.com with SMTP id hi2so8520443wib.15 for ; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 16:56:24 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.21.241 with SMTP id y17mr20530764wie.57.1413849384484; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 16:56:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.217.105.201 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 16:56:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <5444FEBF.10200@gmx.de> <544507CD.9050608@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 20:56:24 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [bpfk] official cmavo form From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jorge_Llamb=C3=ADas?= To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c05::230 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 972099695765 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bb709c85403b80505e376cb X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_bar: - Content-Length: 6887 --047d7bb709c85403b80505e376cb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 8:32 PM, And Rosta wrote: > > On 20 Oct 2014 22:43, "Jorge Llamb=C3=ADas" wrote: > > > > There's no special need to realize /Cia/ as one syllable, but it must b= e > counted as one syllable for penultimate stress rule purposes. > > How come? Is it simply that because word-segmentation is sensitive to > stress, and stress is sensitive to syllabicity, varisyllabicity risks > undermining the consistency of the word-segmentation rules? If so, the > stress or word-segmentation rules can be reformulated so that VV counts a= s > a single metrical unit rather than a sequence of two. > Yes. > > Formulating the rule without mentioning syllables would be more > complicated. > > It's not yet clear to me that that is so, but that could be because I > don't know the rule. > Maybe not terribly more complicated, but at least somewhat more complicated. y-syllables are already exceptions to penultimate stress, as are consonantal syllables and buffer-vowel syllables, so this would be just one more exception. > > It also has to be distinguished from "ciia" > > How come? Is "ciia" licit? Is it licit even if "cia" isn't? > Yes, there's no constraint against vowel i being followed by glide i. > "a'ua" is currently not allowed by camxes, but "a'uua" is (it's two words= ) > > Ah. So the two-word version needn't be "a'u.ua"? I had been thinking that > all words must begin with a consonant. > Since it causes no ambiguity, camxes doesn't force a glottal stop/pause before a word that begins with a glide. But this need not happen at a word boundary: "braka'uua" is a valid fu'ivla. > I would allow "a'ua" (assuming I was not allowed to kill /'/), disallow > "uu", and have all words begin with a consonant, but if "a'uua" must be a > variant of "a'u.ua" then I see why "a'ua" must be forbidden. > Yes, it should be one or the other, but not both. mu'o mi'e xorxes --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= BPFK" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --047d7bb709c85403b80505e376cb Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 8:32 PM, And Rosta <and.rosta@gmail.com&= gt; wrote:

On 20 Oct 2014 22:43, "Jorge Llamb=C3=ADas" <jjllambias@gmail.com> wrote= :
>
> There's no special need to realize /Cia/ as one syllable, but it m= ust be counted as one syllable for penultimate stress rule purposes.

How come? Is it simply that because word-segmentation= is sensitive to stress, and stress is sensitive to syllabicity, varisyllab= icity risks undermining the consistency of the word-segmentation rules? If = so, the stress or word-segmentation rules can be reformulated so that VV co= unts as a single metrical unit rather than a sequence of two.

Yes.=C2=A0

> Formulating the rule without mentioning syllables would= be more complicated.

It's not yet clear to me that that is so, but tha= t could be because I don't know the rule.


Maybe not terribly more complicated, but at least somewhat more comp= licated. y-syllables are already exceptions to penultimate stress, as are c= onsonantal syllables and buffer-vowel syllables, so this would be just one = more exception.
=C2=A0

> It also has to be distinguished from "ciia"

How come? Is "ciia" licit? Is it licit even= if "cia" isn't?

Yes, there's no con= straint against vowel i being followed by glide i.

> "a'ua" is currently not allowed by camxes, but "a&#= 39;uua" is (it's two words)

Ah. So the two-word version needn't be "a= 9;u.ua"? I had been thin= king that all words must begin with a consonant.


<= /div>
Since it causes no ambiguity, camxes doesn't force a glottal = stop/pause before a word that begins with a glide. But this need not happen= at a word boundary: "braka'uua" is a valid fu'ivla.
=C2=A0

I would allow "a'ua" (assuming I was not allow= ed to kill /'/), disallow "uu", and have all words begin with= a consonant, but if "a'uua" must be a variant of "a'= ;u.ua" then I see why &q= uot;a'ua" must be forbidden.


Y= es, it should be one or the other, but not both.

m= u'o mi'e xorxes
=C2=A0

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to bpfk-list= +unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at ht= tp://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--047d7bb709c85403b80505e376cb--