Received: from mail-wi0-f184.google.com ([209.85.212.184]:39872)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.80.1)
	(envelope-from <bpfk-list+bncBCOZJTMR5YGRBMMUWGRAKGQETI2ZWGY@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1XiCMb-00041u-G0; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 18:11:29 -0700
Received: by mail-wi0-f184.google.com with SMTP id d1sf15167wiv.21
        for <multiple recipients>; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 18:11:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806;
        h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender
         :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list
         :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe
         :list-unsubscribe:content-type;
        bh=X4QnVQIVUi9Vk0mggvwMQfkrxoauhJ4K+/FohN9enio=;
        b=GgjA+493iFqp6oTjXAMytR4hW4pNTgsab7i0vcgh9UoL4FuDSomopmT+t8GH9oK/Tv
         fho0C8OC/+kOKRTyOIcO6ADgs1woGplIICALdRmZQAKYw4yuzbUjyDGu3PLcH2n1D+kS
         bP9Gvylcw+i1/eSkf/q/Dq7BVjb7SUFVBUuUp5RNNfRo2D9GzF+ka6SS0bKGOwA5HvZX
         /7xbWIrv6Cy3WHwL5wie3rpV90WVZotsgEqocv0SvyAK4SyKoDts00yYrdOAaIp1VkDA
         vc4LwESTNxIO/TJiq/kdp88C+vJCPRRbGZrPSujHKDcuEP+t3e1F1r681R91xOp5fQae
         Abbg==
X-Received: by 10.152.27.202 with SMTP id v10mr221452lag.0.1414285873993;
        Sat, 25 Oct 2014 18:11:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.152.87.82 with SMTP id v18ls545258laz.46.gmail; Sat, 25 Oct
 2014 18:11:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.152.27.38 with SMTP id q6mr873986lag.5.1414285873097;
        Sat, 25 Oct 2014 18:11:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x22f.google.com (mail-wi0-x22f.google.com. [2a00:1450:400c:c05::22f])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v2si297237wix.1.2014.10.25.18.11.13
        for <bpfk-list@googlegroups.com>
        (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
        Sat, 25 Oct 2014 18:11:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c05::22f as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:400c:c05::22f;
Received: by mail-wi0-f175.google.com with SMTP id h11so1777090wiw.14
        for <bpfk-list@googlegroups.com>; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 18:11:13 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.207.77 with SMTP id lu13mr13149167wic.12.1414285872998;
 Sat, 25 Oct 2014 18:11:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.217.105.201 with HTTP; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 18:11:12 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2014 22:11:12 -0300
Message-ID: <CAO7tK2edBGwqtJa-mnP4n2x0Hab-+f8b8uAnHSuvKxWYGSYFTA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: [bpfk] Another (minor) bug in the PEG morphology
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jorge_Llamb=C3=ADas?= <jjllambias@gmail.com>
To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com;       spf=pass
 (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c05::22f
 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com;       dkim=pass
 header.i=@gmail.com;       dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com
Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <bpfk-list.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 972099695765
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/post>, <mailto:bpfk-list@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/>, <mailto:bpfk-list+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list
Sender: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/subscribe>, <mailto:bpfk-list+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:googlegroups-manage+972099695765+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>,
 <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c3a16a122e3205064917c3
X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-)
X-Spam_score: -1.9
X-Spam_score_int: -18
X-Spam_bar: -
Content-Length: 3311

--001a11c3a16a122e3205064917c3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

I found a new minor bug in the morphology, It only affects certain lujvo
with fu'ivla rafsi which are not used very much so it's not a big surprise
it wasn't detected before.

The problem occurs when fu'ivla rafsi are followed by a short one-syllable
rafsi and nothing more. So for example: "spageti'yprenu" works fine, but
"spageti'ypre", which should also parse, doesn't.

I have changed the stress rule, which I think is what's causing the
problem, to:

stress <- consonant* h? y? syllable pause


I added "h?", which is needed in order to detect the stress in stressed
extended rafsi.

Could someone check whether this fixes the problem? Thanks!

mu'o mi'e xorxes

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--001a11c3a16a122e3205064917c3
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">I found a new minor bug in the morphology, It only affects=
 certain lujvo with fu&#39;ivla rafsi which are not used very much so it&#3=
9;s not a big surprise it wasn&#39;t detected before.<div><br></div><div>Th=
e problem occurs when fu&#39;ivla rafsi are followed by a short one-syllabl=
e rafsi and nothing more. So for example: &quot;spageti&#39;yprenu&quot; wo=
rks fine, but &quot;spageti&#39;ypre&quot;, which should also parse, doesn&=
#39;t.</div><div><br></div><div>I have changed the stress rule, which I thi=
nk is what&#39;s causing the problem, to:</div><div><br></div><div><pre cla=
ss=3D"" dir=3D"ltr" id=3D"codebox" style=3D"font-family:&#39;Courier New&#3=
9;,Courier,monospace;line-height:1.2em;padding:1em;margin-top:0px;margin-bo=
ttom:0px;border:1px solid rgb(105,105,105);overflow:auto;border-top-right-r=
adius:3px;border-bottom-left-radius:3px;border-bottom-right-radius:3px;colo=
r:rgb(0,0,0);font-size:12px;background:rgb(245,245,245)">stress &lt;- conso=
nant* h? y? syllable pause</pre></div><div><br></div><div>I added &quot;h?&=
quot;, which is needed in order to detect the stress in stressed extended r=
afsi.</div><div><br></div><div>Could someone check whether this fixes the p=
roblem? Thanks!</div><div><br></div><div>mu&#39;o mi&#39;e xorxes</div><div=
><br></div></div>

<p></p>

-- <br />
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &=
quot;BPFK&quot; group.<br />
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e=
mail to <a href=3D"mailto:bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com">bpfk-list=
+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com</a>.<br />
To post to this group, send email to <a href=3D"mailto:bpfk-list@googlegrou=
ps.com">bpfk-list@googlegroups.com</a>.<br />
Visit this group at <a href=3D"http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list">ht=
tp://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list</a>.<br />
For more options, visit <a href=3D"https://groups.google.com/d/optout">http=
s://groups.google.com/d/optout</a>.<br />

--001a11c3a16a122e3205064917c3--