Received: from mail-lb0-f183.google.com ([209.85.217.183]:61611)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.80.1)
	(envelope-from <bpfk-list+bncBCOZJTMR5YGRBGHGWORAKGQE5W5S2IA@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1XiNc0-00026m-HZ; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 06:12:05 -0700
Received: by mail-lb0-f183.google.com with SMTP id 10sf432075lbg.20
        for <multiple recipients>; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 06:11:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to
         :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive
         :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type;
        bh=dXjatYX7zx/5C9bVHlwc5vFS4ime9uCWAOmuiJ2zrfo=;
        b=k9Fg9y2cBZyU36DfB01vWy9xrkbYMVoi0aTt7B0XO+Ik4f+bEbwMlyZCBpxAz1Yj34
         SSr5cYfs93dn7A1W6Xp7q+jZ8uLclWz1TO0XEmxZq7qrJA0WEkcdB2dDnjaLiM7m1gKY
         lh47TRPP0Jhz0MLWE/kWAvxpN9dSaxkCtHtxclEL491LSkHkXnREicnaFFZmRZzVg1Bd
         j3yy3dVcE/x9MCxgLedoTgQK8jPBs6v3bur2qX/DXtklRMTer/EQDx4Du1NAn6lvqMMs
         +7JF+xtwmIIoHbeodMp2lEnqnVjTHmE/bfUnqhZdFWCRT7vl/KEkF3vzsbiERP+3AG3H
         23Kw==
X-Received: by 10.152.87.10 with SMTP id t10mr25526laz.5.1414329112570;
        Sun, 26 Oct 2014 06:11:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.152.121.72 with SMTP id li8ls591836lab.101.gmail; Sun, 26 Oct
 2014 06:11:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.112.154.194 with SMTP id vq2mr246299lbb.10.1414329111824;
        Sun, 26 Oct 2014 06:11:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wg0-x22d.google.com (mail-wg0-x22d.google.com. [2a00:1450:400c:c00::22d])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o2si348682wib.2.2014.10.26.06.11.51
        for <bpfk-list@googlegroups.com>
        (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
        Sun, 26 Oct 2014 06:11:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c00::22d as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:400c:c00::22d;
Received: by mail-wg0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id l18so3957712wgh.16
        for <bpfk-list@googlegroups.com>; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 06:11:51 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.84.194 with SMTP id b2mr15564659wiz.57.1414329111694;
 Sun, 26 Oct 2014 06:11:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.217.105.201 with HTTP; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 06:11:51 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <544CEC82.7050408@gmail.com>
References: <33A9DB5129C54FFF85FCDD708B6909D8@gmail.com>
	<CAO7tK2e9Ukj2MaEm-Xr9-dAenOM7wX4fSm1Ci8BKg-QSchswRQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<9c2066d4-8da6-48ec-9cfb-63f79ca42187@googlegroups.com>
	<CAO7tK2fJeQQUrvgo1MzP_XNMhk2or3c6yTERwvdREjM9F9uCKw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAO7tK2eN1oc0JQyr0Rd6ESy-Giq7RW0UbMNRQfXs6K6MD-9fow@mail.gmail.com>
	<20141025153624.GA1727@mercury.ccil.org>
	<CAO7tK2c3huhqOQa25rKojYUszJGre5DCrmHwCABkC0sH_cH8NQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<544BF508.3060500@gmail.com>
	<24AD03E6AEA1476F9B53E0EE111750E9@gmail.com>
	<544BF94F.3040204@gmail.com>
	<CAO7tK2d+_h498M+7jnuhTutY0-h6U3ZUj++2D0YM8ooMk72ZDg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAO7tK2d1HEaJNgGPnFmC-0t_epj9G7xwBizqZ-yJ8Q-JhnfBaA@mail.gmail.com>
	<544CB576.2070503@gmail.com>
	<544CEC82.7050408@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2014 10:11:51 -0300
Message-ID: <CAO7tK2e77KFmuXCX4UyqyNn5R=JP+akvOMFmrOUqxA2tnK8-gg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [bpfk] camxes and syllabification in zi'evla
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jorge_Llamb=C3=ADas?= <jjllambias@gmail.com>
To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com;       spf=pass
 (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c00::22d
 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com;       dkim=pass
 header.i=@gmail.com;       dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com
Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <bpfk-list.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 972099695765
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/post>, <mailto:bpfk-list@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/>, <mailto:bpfk-list+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list
Sender: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/subscribe>, <mailto:bpfk-list+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:googlegroups-manage+972099695765+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>,
 <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d04426b984c523105065328c7
X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-)
X-Spam_score: -1.9
X-Spam_score_int: -18
X-Spam_bar: -
Content-Length: 3075

--f46d04426b984c523105065328c7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 9:43 AM, And Rosta <and.rosta@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> If morpho-codas were unconstrained, and morpho-onsets were as per CLL
> (modulo any semivowel complications), what effects would that have on
> current lexis and usage?


I don't think it would invalidate anything, it would just open the door to
more ugly fu'ivla. The restriction on codas is based solely on aesthetics
and analogy. Lujvo never have codas heavier than a single consonant, and it
seems like a good thing to maintain that restriction for fu'ivla, which are
supposed to be as close as possible to core lojban words without
interfering with their decomposability.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--f46d04426b984c523105065328c7
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><br><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quo=
te">On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 9:43 AM, And Rosta <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a hre=
f=3D"mailto:and.rosta@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">and.rosta@gmail.com</a>&=
gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 =
0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br>
If morpho-codas were unconstrained, and morpho-onsets were as per CLL (modu=
lo any semivowel complications), what effects would that have on current le=
xis and usage?</blockquote><div><br></div><div>I don&#39;t think it would i=
nvalidate anything, it would just open the door to more ugly fu&#39;ivla. T=
he restriction on codas is based solely on aesthetics and analogy. Lujvo ne=
ver have codas heavier than a single consonant, and it seems like a good th=
ing to maintain that restriction for fu&#39;ivla, which are supposed to be =
as close as possible to core lojban words without interfering with their de=
composability.</div><div><br></div><div>mu&#39;o mi&#39;e xorxes</div><div>=
<br></div></div></div></div>

<p></p>

-- <br />
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &=
quot;BPFK&quot; group.<br />
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e=
mail to <a href=3D"mailto:bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com">bpfk-list=
+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com</a>.<br />
To post to this group, send email to <a href=3D"mailto:bpfk-list@googlegrou=
ps.com">bpfk-list@googlegroups.com</a>.<br />
Visit this group at <a href=3D"http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list">ht=
tp://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list</a>.<br />
For more options, visit <a href=3D"https://groups.google.com/d/optout">http=
s://groups.google.com/d/optout</a>.<br />

--f46d04426b984c523105065328c7--