Received: from mail-wg0-f61.google.com ([74.125.82.61]:50441)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.80.1)
	(envelope-from <bpfk-list+bncBDNZFNNFVAHRBAFTWSRAKGQEA7EA52I@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1XiQAZ-0003EN-LP; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 08:55:59 -0700
Received: by mail-wg0-f61.google.com with SMTP id a1sf46457wgh.6
        for <multiple recipients>; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 08:55:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
         :in-reply-to:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results
         :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help
         :list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=PMWtlDMQvKY1JPOmom6e3aLp0Qu4zJcURW8GErhqgMc=;
        b=iWF1915sbKFwP8G92Y13cB/tnnRTkK6Zc/N6PegA61C5cdgUEqotKU1Tm7vvvLu1at
         vgq6Akfn3dXVZlnmGVLJfqYO9xsy/Lty+onoRUsxtIM8FMesnq15cbDbHyjADcEkkP3I
         8gHEqte3N/2bIA/jY+YppedGNZ1+FsXijyD/1GzfZxp7Zyt7tNUFv3OXx4vEQHwdPkCn
         qIKPmgfhTN7JgYm6PM/LA56rqxP/nlctBPknzKLW9W5FgJKMV07OEFas46k5VZJ4wKpH
         a2oM519zFfirieActPzopygyNtQGukI+DqjLTPEJ5cMgEBCOws9+c5Y7KjvdfS0wI9Ii
         /RCA==
X-Received: by 10.152.207.2 with SMTP id ls2mr256928lac.1.1414338944292;
        Sun, 26 Oct 2014 08:55:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.152.27.129 with SMTP id t1ls571775lag.53.gmail; Sun, 26 Oct
 2014 08:55:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.152.42.171 with SMTP id p11mr735428lal.4.1414338943479;
        Sun, 26 Oct 2014 08:55:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wg0-x22e.google.com (mail-wg0-x22e.google.com. [2a00:1450:400c:c00::22e])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h1si444278wib.0.2014.10.26.08.55.43
        for <bpfk-list@googlegroups.com>
        (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
        Sun, 26 Oct 2014 08:55:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of and.rosta@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c00::22e as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:400c:c00::22e;
Received: by mail-wg0-f46.google.com with SMTP id l18so4091902wgh.5
        for <bpfk-list@googlegroups.com>; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 08:55:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.180.72.5 with SMTP id z5mr16043400wiu.16.1414338943371;
        Sun, 26 Oct 2014 08:55:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.4] (97e2292d.skybroadband.com. [151.226.41.45])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id u4sm8731036wiy.9.2014.10.26.08.55.41
        for <multiple recipients>
        (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
        Sun, 26 Oct 2014 08:55:42 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <544D197D.5000709@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2014 15:55:41 +0000
From: And Rosta <and.rosta@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120711 Thunderbird/14.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [bpfk] camxes and syllabification in zi'evla
References: <33A9DB5129C54FFF85FCDD708B6909D8@gmail.com> <CAO7tK2e9Ukj2MaEm-Xr9-dAenOM7wX4fSm1Ci8BKg-QSchswRQ@mail.gmail.com> <9c2066d4-8da6-48ec-9cfb-63f79ca42187@googlegroups.com> <CAO7tK2fJeQQUrvgo1MzP_XNMhk2or3c6yTERwvdREjM9F9uCKw@mail.gmail.com> <CAO7tK2eN1oc0JQyr0Rd6ESy-Giq7RW0UbMNRQfXs6K6MD-9fow@mail.gmail.com> <20141025153624.GA1727@mercury.ccil.org> <CAO7tK2c3huhqOQa25rKojYUszJGre5DCrmHwCABkC0sH_cH8NQ@mail.gmail.com> <544BF508.3060500@gmail.com> <24AD03E6AEA1476F9B53E0EE111750E9@gmail.com> <544BF94F.3040204@gmail.com> <CAO7tK2d+_h498M+7jnuhTutY0-h6U3ZUj++2D0YM8ooMk72ZDg@mail.gmail.com> <CAO7tK2d1HEaJNgGPnFmC-0t_epj9G7xwBizqZ-yJ8Q-JhnfBaA@mail.gmail.com> <544CB576.2070503@gmail.com> <CAO7tK2f5j3=of=2cei-yR780Y6peBr=VxDQr5ySw6HW6KU9zzA@mail.gmail.com> <544CF7D1.9050300@gmail.com> <CAO7tK2d_5SxM8my6Dmk4ho1+rzmhfOsgO=khTiKdqw-wW_fb5A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAO7tK2d_5SxM8my6Dmk4ho1+rzmhfOsgO=khTiKdqw-wW_fb5A@mail.gmail.com>
X-Original-Sender: and.rosta@gmail.com
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com;       spf=pass
 (google.com: domain of and.rosta@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c00::22e
 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=and.rosta@gmail.com;       dkim=pass
 header.i=@gmail.com;       dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com
Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <bpfk-list.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 972099695765
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/post>, <mailto:bpfk-list@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/>, <mailto:bpfk-list+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list
Sender: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/subscribe>, <mailto:bpfk-list+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:googlegroups-manage+972099695765+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>,
 <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-)
X-Spam_score: -1.9
X-Spam_score_int: -18
X-Spam_bar: -
Content-Length: 1639

Jorge Llamb=EDas, On 26/10/2014 13:58: =20
> On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 10:32 AM, And Rosta <and.rosta@gmail.com <mailto:=
and.rosta@gmail.com>> wrote:
>         There are 18 valid (morphological) codas: the 17 consonants and t=
he empty coda.
>
>
>     I guess it's at least 17, because each of the 17 Cs can occur word-me=
dially before another C that it can't occur word-initially before?
>
>
> I don't understand the question.

Is it the case that each of the 17 Cs can occur at the start of a cluster t=
hat is licit in the middle of a word but not at the start of a word.

Unrelatedly, what's the basis for allowing CCC onsets? Does CLL expressly l=
icence CCC in fu'ivla? The licitness of CCC onsets can't be derived from gi=
smu, lujvo, cmavo. And does CLL forbid CCCC onsets in fu'ivla? (I'm being l=
azy, here, aren't I. If that's annoying, do remonstrate with me and I'll se=
arch online before asking.)

>         Just the former. I would not want to categorize "poktpftcu" for
>         example as a valid word.
>
>     But is that for any reason other than habit?
>
> Probably not. It just doesn't look like lojban to me.

If you're describing rather than defining the language, then that's okay, I=
 suppose.

--And.

--=20
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "=
BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e=
mail to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.