Received: from mail-wg0-f64.google.com ([74.125.82.64]:43805) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1XiQlp-0003UZ-W5; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 09:34:29 -0700 Received: by mail-wg0-f64.google.com with SMTP id m15sf202172wgh.19 for ; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 09:34:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=ze4Zah4V6NJ4cGwiSdkulMTJZItRip3vzMx7ut9ZPN4=; b=tx25Ip+XD14ZDRBQaOjkRMtOuI+V1NYpclpMzQQqNWeUfgvqSpGP6WmGkz91tcGVSh 15fHJs8XjAYqBosJNOxTEI0cliiEjIbBlBnm18KYhcSCXr7FczSmK1M18ONcGovO8Q0y hmvUQddeGwTmHHAkZn5dduzplc4RHc68nyi6U8scUCbhEX3H9phcT5oL48PSUd0VLenx XyWlToN+YP58fcO7RRZ/8J2VJE60IaTWE8SOVZpDl/bQpem6DGJWb414/r3VFmttyrNp cI0zf8KSWUw8cETvaGOm426IVKEQefciCFtFdO4thRLLMCxkhtQIGwXLR7wDwwDjYPgN HD5w== X-Received: by 10.180.198.134 with SMTP id jc6mr48359wic.0.1414341249980; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 09:34:09 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.180.92.66 with SMTP id ck2ls374057wib.25.canary; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 09:34:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.194.58.47 with SMTP id n15mr1243092wjq.0.1414341249727; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 09:34:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wi0-x234.google.com (mail-wi0-x234.google.com. [2a00:1450:400c:c05::234]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l9si3536wix.1.2014.10.26.09.34.09 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 26 Oct 2014 09:34:09 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c05::234 as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:400c:c05::234; Received: by mail-wi0-x234.google.com with SMTP id hi2so991862wib.1 for ; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 09:34:09 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.101.102 with SMTP id ff6mr16271412wib.34.1414341249647; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 09:34:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.217.105.201 with HTTP; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 09:34:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <544D197D.5000709@gmail.com> References: <33A9DB5129C54FFF85FCDD708B6909D8@gmail.com> <9c2066d4-8da6-48ec-9cfb-63f79ca42187@googlegroups.com> <20141025153624.GA1727@mercury.ccil.org> <544BF508.3060500@gmail.com> <24AD03E6AEA1476F9B53E0EE111750E9@gmail.com> <544BF94F.3040204@gmail.com> <544CB576.2070503@gmail.com> <544CF7D1.9050300@gmail.com> <544D197D.5000709@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2014 13:34:09 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [bpfk] camxes and syllabification in zi'evla From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jorge_Llamb=C3=ADas?= To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c05::234 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 972099695765 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d04182620c6cc65050655fb39 X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_bar: - Content-Length: 9104 --f46d04182620c6cc65050655fb39 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 12:55 PM, And Rosta wrote: > Jorge Llamb=C3=ADas, On 26/10/2014 13:58: > >> On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 10:32 AM, And Rosta > and.rosta@gmail.com>> wrote: >> There are 18 valid (morphological) codas: the 17 consonants and >> the empty coda. >> >> I guess it's at least 17, because each of the 17 Cs can occur >> word-medially before another C that it can't occur word-initially before= ? >> >> I don't understand the question. >> > > Is it the case that each of the 17 Cs can occur at the start of a cluster > that is licit in the middle of a word but not at the start of a word. > Ah, ok. Yes. In addition to the 17 single consonants, consonantal syllables also have that property, but they are not counted as part of the coda of the preceding syllable, they form a syllable on their own. > Unrelatedly, what's the basis for allowing CCC onsets? Does CLL expressly > licence CCC in fu'ivla? The licitness of CCC onsets can't be derived from > gismu, lujvo, cmavo. And does CLL forbid CCCC onsets in fu'ivla? (I'm bei= ng > lazy, here, aren't I. If that's annoying, do remonstrate with me and I'll > search online before asking.) Yes, CLL allows the 36 CCC onsets that camxes allows, plus a whole lot more (an infinite number in fact). CLL allows as initials any combination of consonants in which each CC pair is a valid initial, and the existence of the four affricate initials tc, ts, dj, dz means that indefinitely long onsets are allowed: For example tstststststststststststststsati would be a valid fu'ivla for CLL. camxes keeps the CLL rule but excluding the affricates from the combinations, and that automatically restricts it to the 36 CCC and nothing else. fu'ivla do allow a couple of things not present in lujvo, but not a lot more: CCC initials and consonantal syllables. There is a progression where each class of words introduces something new: we start with vanilla CV (17 consonants and 5 vowels). Then we have: (1a) gismu introduce CCV and CVC syllables, with the 48 valid CC onsets and the rules for which CVC can be followed by which CV. (1b) cmavo introduce four new onsets (the dot and the apostrophe, the i/u glides) and five new nuclei (the four diphthongs and y), plus the rule that dot can only be initial and apostrophe can only be medial (and possibly CG initials, although not in official cmavo). (2) lujvo introduce CVVC and hVC syllables, required to prevent CVV and CVhV initial rafsi from falling off, and I think that's about it. (3) fu'ivla introduce CCC initials and consonantal syllables. (4) cmevla introduce dot-consonant and consonant-dot, and currently a whole lot of other things. I would prefer that fu'ivla did not introduce consonantal syllables. They were added to make type-3 fu'ivla possible, with their CrC clusters, but that could be easily managed with CyrC instead, only requiring a coda for y syllables (which are not currently used outside of cmevla). The initial CCC are almost there already in lujvo, because we have lujvo like mispre that can easily be syllabified as mi-spre. So even though they don't occur word-initially, they are already present in the middle of words= . mu'o mi'e xorxes --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= BPFK" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --f46d04182620c6cc65050655fb39 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

= On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 12:55 PM, And Rosta <and.rosta@gmail.com&g= t; wrote:
Jorge Llamb=C3=ADas, On = 26/10/2014 13:58:=C2=A0
On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 10:32 AM, And Rosta <and.rosta@gmail.com <mailto:and.rosta@gmail.com>&= gt; wrote:
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 There are 18 valid (morphological) codas: the 1= 7 consonants and the empty coda.

=C2=A0 =C2=A0 I guess it's at least 17, because each of the 17 Cs can o= ccur word-medially before another C that it can't occur word-initially = before?

I don't understand the question.

Is it the case that each of the 17 Cs can occur at the start of a cluster t= hat is licit in the middle of a word but not at the start of a word.

Ah, ok. Yes.

In addi= tion to the 17 single consonants, consonantal syllables also have that prop= erty, but they are not counted as part of the coda of the preceding syllabl= e, they form a syllable on their own.
=C2=A0
Unrelatedly, what's the basis for allowing CCC onsets? Does CLL express= ly licence CCC in fu'ivla? The licitness of CCC onsets can't be der= ived from gismu, lujvo, cmavo. And does CLL forbid CCCC onsets in fu'iv= la? (I'm being lazy, here, aren't I. If that's annoying, do rem= onstrate with me and I'll search online before asking.)

Yes, CLL allows the 36 CCC onsets that camxes allows, plus= a whole lot more (an infinite number in fact). CLL allows as initials any = combination of consonants in which each CC pair is a valid initial, and the= existence of the four affricate initials tc, ts, dj, dz means that indefin= itely long onsets are allowed: For example tstststststststststststststsati = would be a valid fu'ivla for CLL.

camxes keeps= the CLL rule but excluding the affricates from the combinations, and that = automatically restricts it to the 36 CCC and nothing else.

fu'ivla do allow a couple of things not present in lujvo, but = not a lot more: CCC initials and consonantal syllables.=C2=A0
There is a progression where each class of words introduces som= ething new: we start with vanilla CV (17 consonants and 5 vowels). Then we = have:

(1a) gismu introduce CCV and CVC syllables, = with the 48 valid CC onsets and the rules for which CVC can be followed by = which CV.=C2=A0
(1b) cmavo introduce four new onsets (the dot and= the apostrophe, the i/u glides) and five new nuclei (the four diphthongs a= nd y), plus the rule that dot can only be initial and apostrophe can only b= e medial (and possibly CG initials, although not in official cmavo).
<= div>(2) lujvo introduce CVVC and hVC syllables, required to prevent CVV and= CVhV initial rafsi from falling off, and I think that's about it.
(3) fu'ivla introduce CCC initials and consonantal syllables.
(4) cmevla introduce dot-consonant and consonant-dot, and currently = a whole lot of other things.

I would prefer that f= u'ivla did not introduce consonantal syllables. They were added to make= type-3 fu'ivla possible, with their CrC clusters, but that could be ea= sily managed with CyrC instead, only requiring a coda for y syllables (whic= h are not currently used outside of cmevla).

The i= nitial CCC are almost there already in lujvo, because we have lujvo like mi= spre that can easily be syllabified as mi-spre. So even though they don'= ;t occur word-initially, they are already present in the middle of words.

mu'o mi'e xorxes=C2=A0

=

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to bpfk-list= +unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at ht= tp://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--f46d04182620c6cc65050655fb39--