Received: from mail-qc0-f186.google.com ([209.85.216.186]:58937) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1XiX24-0006TU-QG; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 16:15:37 -0700 Received: by mail-qc0-f186.google.com with SMTP id b13sf791849qcw.13 for ; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 16:15:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :user-agent:sender:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-disposition; bh=/zxvUkyjLr4FMjS1Fdu4FvFwsq2YlO51YBNRbyGsulw=; b=ki7IHjgIy28e866fKUBro9MrT9iRM5fDyfUjNP7RGYTlHgl4F0YcgNBT/tSbNyqkAZ MxzFw0Gq5jnPC+WCZAsqi5ntp25d7tVsXcdFD5du856TuvuFcVrVFlwAjdCGzIfnGlwg igzukmli7x6/IAXqzAdnrRhWIIGK302Rc9vD+LzvXX+FIvcg/barT/2OEAKhzt/sEKxO boz+NbUc2v9ta0yBbekaXG3FnG0iYGVC5gQotrAMJNAz+L5Tqk/ajZlW4xbMi+/6EPrK 35pARejiSTsknEQ6/76MMiA2URiHv1Z9g0jukPA/rvd2f1092CCI6YSyqYTKSYSKQjAF o2Qg== X-Received: by 10.140.94.242 with SMTP id g105mr407392qge.0.1414365318990; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 16:15:18 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.140.108.3 with SMTP id i3ls6029qgf.73.gmail; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 16:15:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.224.45.132 with SMTP id e4mr18519456qaf.2.1414365318834; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 16:15:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from earth.ccil.org (earth.ccil.org. [192.190.237.11]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 19si558092igl.2.2014.10.26.16.15.18 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 26 Oct 2014 16:15:18 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of cowan@ccil.org designates 192.190.237.11 as permitted sender) client-ip=192.190.237.11; Received: from cowan by earth.ccil.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1XiX1p-0004Jt-8U for bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 19:15:17 -0400 Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2014 19:15:17 -0400 From: John Cowan To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [bpfk] camxes and syllabification in zi'evla Message-ID: <20141026231516.GF9104@mercury.ccil.org> References: <544BF508.3060500@gmail.com> <24AD03E6AEA1476F9B53E0EE111750E9@gmail.com> <544BF94F.3040204@gmail.com> <544CB576.2070503@gmail.com> <544CF7D1.9050300@gmail.com> <20141026174903.GC9104@mercury.ccil.org> <544D5919.8030704@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <544D5919.8030704@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: cowan@ccil.org X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of cowan@ccil.org designates 192.190.237.11 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=cowan@ccil.org Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 972099695765 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_bar: - Content-Length: 1779 And Rosta scripsit: > Really six vowels rather than seven? What about the buffer vowel. That's one of the things that should have been left out. In Loglan, there were two dialects: in one, /y/ was realized as [@] and no buffer was permitted; in the other, /y/ was realized as [j@] and all other instances of [@] were epenthetic. JCB actually required that in the second dialect [@] be inserted at *all* points; however, no one ever did that as far as anyone knows. > (FWIW I'd have given /y/ the normative value [y] and /%/ the normative > value [@], swapping the values when the phonemes are adjacent to > /i, u/.) Vocalic consonants were first introduced, I think to serve the role of /y/. In post-split Loglan they came to be written doubled and to be treated morphologically as consonant pairs (thus "ammata" is a valid brivla whereas "amata" falls apart into "a ma ta"). But I wouldn't be happy with a front rounded vowel, given how rare they are (as phonemes) in the world's languages. -- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan cowan@ccil.org It is revolting to have no better reason for a rule of law than that so it was laid down in the time of Henry IV. It is still more revolting if the grounds upon which it was laid down have vanished long since, and the rule simply persists from blind imitation of the past. --Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.