Received: from mail-la0-f61.google.com ([209.85.215.61]:46385) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1Xs45G-0001sF-89; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 22:22:16 -0800 Received: by mail-la0-f61.google.com with SMTP id gm9sf211160lab.26 for ; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 22:22:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help :list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=07slz7NRgWqM1jvj8tr6EQrkvN/eCMe/XqumFQBvQ+Y=; b=Eb5AVH4/42EddkTn7FuX+JA5haHUV20d86l9agZeSI01//QF0x7QBCrWcu5BE9gs9I Y1pdr8TKQQXA2LI+HsTZX+tZ5DXnZo9PaKYhRDaQatj1wa9gSC2EEOyXHFufHwSdd2km jU0Iqt8fCRSc8rR9KvyZcGJEibgxOC2nFs1fImP+MrRxymvfq3MBCRMsts1HI9srA+d+ xGzm4t1siO2sqdcGmjaTe5ghyxVX/GSk2tbEs44yMnaF4q8WwNaSWzx4AbFjULoVQ7FH P/d4eyb9QIuC99rrswKl8WnAN7Qvcu2o5UxNgKtll/tJzFNzFmfxXyxYAHfTJs0RzZdW hDzg== X-Received: by 10.152.37.169 with SMTP id z9mr147693laj.2.1416637326508; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 22:22:06 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.152.18.200 with SMTP id y8ls265663lad.14.gmail; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 22:22:05 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.112.17.65 with SMTP id m1mr53133lbd.16.1416637325593; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 22:22:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-wi0-x22c.google.com (mail-wi0-x22c.google.com. [2a00:1450:400c:c05::22c]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id jv2si85797wid.1.2014.11.21.22.22.05 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 21 Nov 2014 22:22:05 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c05::22c as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:400c:c05::22c; Received: by mail-wi0-f172.google.com with SMTP id n3so1177607wiv.11 for ; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 22:22:05 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.150.148 with SMTP id ui20mr14448292wjb.90.1416637325428; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 22:22:05 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.87.229 with HTTP; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 22:22:05 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <407A8993FE744C7FB7AA19EDAB90EE87@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2014 09:22:05 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [bpfk] {e'i} in usage and in the wiki From: Gleki Arxokuna To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e01175e218ece2805086c947b X-Original-Sender: gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c05::22c as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 972099695765 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_bar: - Content-Length: 5605 --089e01175e218ece2805086c947b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 2014-11-22 0:31 GMT+03:00 Jorge Llamb=C3=ADas : > > > On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 6:21 PM, Alex Burka wrote: > >> Er, how is this not redundant to {.ei}? {.ei mi cliva} is what I've >> always said for that example. >> > > They are similar, yes. The main difference is that with ".e'i" the speake= r > is the source of authority, whereas with ".ei" it's just how the speaker > feels things ought to be. With first person actions the difference can be > very subtle, but with second or third person it's more clear: "ei" is "th= is > ought to happen", whereas ".e'i" is "let this happen, make this happen". > "ei gusni" "there ought to be light (but there's nothing I can do about > it)" "e'i gusni" "let there be light (I command that it be so)". > How can "I have to go" and "I should go" be subtle? Their difference is very important. Why losing it? > mu'o mi'e xorxes > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "BPFK" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= BPFK" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --089e01175e218ece2805086c947b Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


2014-11-22 0:31 GMT+03:00 Jorge Llamb=C3=ADas <jjllambias@gmail.com= >:


On = Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 6:21 PM, Alex Burka <durka42@gmail.com>= wrote:
Er, how is this not redundant to {.ei}? {.ei mi cliva}= is what I've always said for that example.

=
They are similar, yes. The main difference is that with &= quot;.e'i" the speaker is the source of authority, whereas with &q= uot;.ei" it's just how the speaker feels things ought to be. With = first person actions the difference can be very subtle, but with second or = third person it's more clear: "ei" is "this ought to hap= pen", whereas ".e'i" is "let this happen, make this= happen". "ei gusni" "there ought to be light (but ther= e's nothing I can do about it)" "e'i gusni" "le= t there be light (I command that it be so)".

How can "I have to go" and "I= should go" be subtle? Their difference is very important.
W= hy losing it?


mu'o mi'e xorxes
=C2=A0

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to bpfk-list= +unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at ht= tp://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--089e01175e218ece2805086c947b--