Received: from mail-wg0-f58.google.com ([74.125.82.58]:41138) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1Xs7Li-0002ip-6M; Sat, 22 Nov 2014 01:51:27 -0800 Received: by mail-wg0-f58.google.com with SMTP id x12sf567794wgg.3 for ; Sat, 22 Nov 2014 01:51:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help :list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=/gzGG/txTU3BglocVTqP1wrzybqtEqlFWAWvIOY/OPI=; b=RgXeFv9kFK3WJlz2ofnocJUwkjHzyTscLrq4gQppqWBQLhDCw77LtqixMcN0+Npf24 Grl5SeP6Ui0Rf8VahnNotEnPVb0JGiJYoLMD588ubNaBDXUZR9mBVVXwSwu+FtOAYVoK j8WjynHyzj573V3dHWMI5Ml3l/NWLbT0IZTMWJVvVDYM2LJO6KW8oAw4IJ5K9fj/CiPW emuPWpJNIOe+LyP77tbCzR0/erF6LoCOsnLAD/NctJq/kkQbEQbS9D/yIzY+Zps4HEYU MAyVFQT6qcoUIZI49uysTHrSyMbZuhz12vr2qSpDNEb3eS8ppgfTBXSz/PBFizSdeIux pDYQ== X-Received: by 10.152.20.165 with SMTP id o5mr119lae.39.1416649879540; Sat, 22 Nov 2014 01:51:19 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.152.205.10 with SMTP id lc10ls283217lac.22.gmail; Sat, 22 Nov 2014 01:51:18 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.112.159.199 with SMTP id xe7mr18261lbb.21.1416649878610; Sat, 22 Nov 2014 01:51:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-wi0-x236.google.com (mail-wi0-x236.google.com. [2a00:1450:400c:c05::236]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p14si99312wie.1.2014.11.22.01.51.18 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 22 Nov 2014 01:51:18 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c05::236 as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:400c:c05::236; Received: by mail-wi0-x236.google.com with SMTP id h11so1504093wiw.3 for ; Sat, 22 Nov 2014 01:51:18 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.11.65 with SMTP id o1mr4743261wib.22.1416649878496; Sat, 22 Nov 2014 01:51:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.87.229 with HTTP; Sat, 22 Nov 2014 01:51:18 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2014 12:51:18 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [bpfk] ki'ecu'i - ki'enai From: Gleki Arxokuna To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c259bcc76e1305086f809b X-Original-Sender: gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c05::236 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 972099695765 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_bar: - Content-Length: 8020 --001a11c259bcc76e1305086f809b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 2014-11-21 23:44 GMT+03:00 Jorge Llamb=C3=ADas : > > On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 4:39 AM, Gleki Arxokuna < > gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com> wrote: > >> In >> >> i mi si'unai mo'u tolcri ki'ecu'i la alis >> I found myself, no thanks to Alice. >> > > "ki'e" is a vocative, not a BAI, so it would be used to address Alice, no= t > to say something about her. (so something like "No thanks to you, Alice") > oh ok, indeed. > "si'u nai la alis" would work for "with no help from Alice". > > {ki'enai} wont be appropriate imo, although imo in some situations "no >> thanks to you" can mean {ki'enai} >> >> "It's no thanks to you that I arrive on time" >> Here, it could mean that the other person's actions might even have >> resulted in the person arriving late, but despite those actions, the per= son >> still managed to arrive on time. >> > > Maybe in the example, it was Alice that hid what you were looking for, so > you found it despite her actions to prevent you from finding it. > > However, the phrase "Isn't "resentment"/"bitterness" the polar opposite o= f >> thanks/gratitude? >> " on http://www.lojban.org/tiki/BPFK+Section%3A+Vocatives >> >> makes sense. >> For now, I voted against this page. >> > > What's your suggested new wording for the definition? > I'm not sure every COI or UI has a single word/construct in English apropariate in all contexts. For ki'enai: mi jai lerci ki'enai la kevin - I'm late and that's because of you, bastard Kevin. "ki'e cu'i" and "ki'e nai" would both be somewhat impolite, and I don't > think they have seen much usage. > > mu'o mi'e xorxes > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "BPFK" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= BPFK" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --001a11c259bcc76e1305086f809b Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


2014-11-21 23:44 GMT+03:00 Jorge Llamb=C3=ADas <jjllambias@gmail.co= m>:

On Fri= , Nov 21, 2014 at 4:39 AM, Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail= .com> wrote:
In=C2=A0

i mi si'unai mo'u tolcri ki'ecu&= #39;i la alis
I found myself, no thanks to Alice.
=

"ki'e" is a vocative,= not a BAI, so it would be used to address Alice, not to say something abou= t her. (so something like "No thanks to you, Alice")
<= /div>

oh ok, indeed.
=C2=A0=
=C2=A0"si'u nai la alis&quo= t; would work for "with no help from Alice".=C2=A0

{ki'enai} wont be appropriate imo, although imo in some situations &qu= ot;no thanks to you" can mean {ki'enai}

<= div>"It's no thanks to you that I arrive on time"
H= ere,=C2=A0it could mean that the other person's actions might even have= resulted in the person arriving late, but despite those actions, the perso= n still managed to arrive on time.

<= /div>
Maybe in the example, it was Alice that hid what you were = looking for, so you found it despite her actions to prevent you from findin= g it.=C2=A0

However, the phrase "Isn't "resent= ment"/"bitterness" the polar opposite of thanks/gratitude?
For now, I voted against this p= age.

What's your sug= gested new wording for the definition?
=

I'm not sure every COI or UI has a single word/cons= truct in English apropariate in all contexts. For ki'enai:
mi jai lerci ki'enai la kevin - I'm late and that'= s because of you, bastard Kevin.

"ki'e cu'i" and "ki'e nai" would= both be somewhat impolite, and I don't think they have seen much usage= .

mu'o mi'e xorxes

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to bpfk-list= +unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at ht= tp://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--001a11c259bcc76e1305086f809b--