Received: from mail-pd0-f192.google.com ([209.85.192.192]:62460) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1XnJGH-0002DJ-11; Sat, 08 Nov 2014 19:34:02 -0800 Received: by mail-pd0-f192.google.com with SMTP id z10sf800209pdj.9 for ; Sat, 08 Nov 2014 19:33:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :user-agent:sender:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-disposition :content-transfer-encoding; bh=fqrnFKmSd9/43+joO6RTa95IwZA6o9Rm6QtdfL4kcPM=; b=mTlgd0FVtR3JguftYvZdN0MhAp9mJeBCHV28L/fU1buJwP8s/6cpYQKNkSLFrJbaKu 4fBhMURQVqOHGP8QuZ7iTwzb5+o7j/ldEdMUYFwg/Jl3Qll7LZS7KG9SCQSSmgdM6rm+ 2RfZ/H5qLMJAIZYIKKiLD6NhFSGRz4eWxs2eI+SiAc99SXPaycI0Mj/l6EVGIDtnD9jU yDt5mM7Aj7mlfNKmvPhTfgr5tB5drUiiquybJRtx2pQ9ueBafwdg+evKAeuW6ZzlMn9r qXMYpbj0mSpSafdizEC+WcOGRQ4L9IiMGDNwEb/0YiTtbYjk9Q28UH9CojAN7gu2g0ye y6wg== X-Received: by 10.50.142.105 with SMTP id rv9mr153844igb.0.1415504030480; Sat, 08 Nov 2014 19:33:50 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.50.98.3 with SMTP id ee3ls183699igb.38.canary; Sat, 08 Nov 2014 19:33:50 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.68.201.195 with SMTP id kc3mr17616251pbc.3.1415504030174; Sat, 08 Nov 2014 19:33:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from earth.ccil.org (earth.ccil.org. [192.190.237.11]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id gy6si737313igb.1.2014.11.08.19.33.48 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 08 Nov 2014 19:33:48 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of cowan@ccil.org designates 192.190.237.11 as permitted sender) client-ip=192.190.237.11; Received: from cowan by earth.ccil.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1XnJG7-0001Cr-SZ for bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; Sat, 08 Nov 2014 22:33:47 -0500 Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2014 22:33:47 -0500 From: John Cowan To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [bpfk] camxes and syllabification in zi'evla Message-ID: <20141109033347.GO6360@mercury.ccil.org> References: <24AD03E6AEA1476F9B53E0EE111750E9@gmail.com> <544BF94F.3040204@gmail.com> <544CB576.2070503@gmail.com> <544CF7D1.9050300@gmail.com> <544D197D.5000709@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: cowan@ccil.org X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of cowan@ccil.org designates 192.190.237.11 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=cowan@ccil.org Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 972099695765 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_bar: - Content-Length: 2820 Jorge Llamb=C3=ADas scripsit: > Yes, CLL allows the 36 CCC onsets that camxes allows, plus a whole > lot more (an infinite number in fact). CLL allows as initials > any combination of consonants in which each CC pair is a valid > initial, and the existence of the four affricate initials tc, ts, > dj, dz means that indefinitely long onsets are allowed: For example > tstststststststststststststsati would be a valid fu'ivla for CLL. That was obviously ill-thought-out on my part. The whole idea of CCC... initials was added at the last minute, and should have been left out. > camxes keeps the CLL rule but excluding the affricates from the > combinations, and that automatically restricts it to the 36 CCC and > nothing else. I like this. > (3) fu'ivla introduce CCC initials and consonantal syllables. However, they also forbid "y" in any position: see CLL 4.7, rule 4. The following note "Note that consonant triples or larger clusters that are not at the beginning of a fu'ivla can be quite flexible, as long as all consonant pairs are permissible. There is no need to restrict fu'ivla clusters to permissible initial pairs except at the beginning." should be ignored: we do not want "cmacrpspspspspspspspspspspspspsa". > (4) cmevla introduce dot-consonant and consonant-dot, and currently a > whole lot of other things. I think restricting cmevla to standard syllables, vocalic and consonantal, is basically rich enough. Indeed, it may be too flexible in allowing V-V hiatus: "koreas." is made of valid syllables, but is IMO unlojbanic. Horrors like "mxysptlk." simply should not be allowed as cmevla (see .) However, we may want to allow CyC and some coda clusters, so that "miks. .iespitlyk." (closer to the actual English pronunciation) is permitted. > I would prefer that fu'ivla did not introduce consonantal > syllables. They were added to make type-3 fu'ivla possible, with their > CrC clusters, but that could be easily managed with CyrC instead, only > requiring a coda for y syllables (which are not currently used outside > of cmevla). Violates rule 4. Consonantal syllables suck, but I think we are stuck with them. --=20 John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan cowan@ccil.org My confusion is rapidly waxing For XML Schema's too taxing: I'd use DTDs / If they had local trees -- I think I best switch to RELAX NG. --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= BPFK" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.