Received: from mail-ob0-f183.google.com ([209.85.214.183]:46142) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1Y1mpR-0004qH-2q; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 17:58:09 -0800 Received: by mail-ob0-f183.google.com with SMTP id vb8sf2548515obc.0; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 17:57:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :content-type:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe; bh=waje8hitVqIfhSJN6qvE57E5LUbvHfZgOFZNVVEee0c=; b=qlrtcpnR9FAlr2pA/FOIb/b6xSjPxr9En8n+yUbFXl1hPANZ7QqMbUmf5wyPUKaAFa PL+eW0mrDCVbO6FqgdsiDPAX7ofunZf3E7sxp+hK+YNr5mQ5nZIV+qJ6NdHuhdZHfoWV Hgy1Bc38/qv3l1T04cDAdgTDkc1CdI/TBeUlYcqKEkwj2o1E3afjKS5z79X+7QVVqNAZ vmusPWU4h61rUDz4oa/iqZqfAxdiYLMHq9AwjUTkrdY3bbs5nUgmbC3xFX3tEvU+r8uj W3cp6xbeEM6d92Ph6zUmHi8VILEomNiiGXcD9jTjn++gnnvbfTEtgMbAKkFtphjPURdm 8VzQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :content-type:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe; bh=waje8hitVqIfhSJN6qvE57E5LUbvHfZgOFZNVVEee0c=; b=0wJhlseWkHIHoaWWFKoCE/rVUPLogNsuPIC2c/xaUuWavfLsEvy4s/GfXJvN1XRvAT BZOUE2KFsEzUqiSQ97Ovy5UD2FdjkIEGQ4CRPl8APA2hwW6Pv6vDan2UoyAOshbQkSRB CktY/DhiHnBrTBOvSeywO/O9p5wI7JfxbAMC1pCnX99xFy36cHRejr8X98VfGD4zWttf 4wjtUbwITrpKWCtugdZkodneuqqnA9AIhSy5crMMNei/tOmLdAdmpKyQIxw1XWbLopwD gRs1aD+4eZIGxA+WaKOM3aWrotQn1NHJ5G9gLGMyHSPlGNgWCTvutJY1rWPrHLxHSnQp QOiQ== X-Received: by 10.50.132.71 with SMTP id os7mr9967igb.11.1418954279053; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 17:57:59 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.50.62.42 with SMTP id v10ls60799igr.21.canary; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 17:57:58 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.50.7.100 with SMTP id i4mr9940iga.11.1418954278861; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 17:57:58 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 17:57:58 -0800 (PST) From: guskant To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Message-Id: <5660b66f-68e1-4e9c-b4ce-1713a7bf1491@googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: References: <548AC3CB.7090403@gmx.de> <580B9AB84B34485AB4139B921C46CF42@gmail.com> <3ED463A548E74A53BD8F2ECEF0C620F8@gmail.com> <14FDADF47D7841A39D612894E81CC89B@gmail.com> <20141214025736.GB19927@mercury.ccil.org> <20141214190350.GD29313@mercury.ccil.org> Subject: Re: [bpfk] official cmavo form MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_Part_208_526913919.1418954278075" X-Original-Sender: gusni.kantu@gmail.com Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 972099695765 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) X-Spam_score: -2.0 X-Spam_score_int: -19 X-Spam_bar: -- Content-Length: 3918 ------=_Part_208_526913919.1418954278075 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_209_1767160052.1418954278075" ------=_Part_209_1767160052.1418954278075 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 This is reminder and interim report. The poll will be closed on 2014-12-27 at 0:00 UTC (it might be a few hours later depending on my connection to the Internet.) http://goo.gl/forms/5KbiK5yBky Currently, "2. disallow CgV in cmevla/fu'ivla/ma'ovla" is predominant. https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1kJLBvjkoDpmvA9vJS_lf8SpCYAZvY4bMx1pj8uhWqRs/viewanalytics As a supporter of "1.3.1. allow CgV in cmevla, disallow it in fu'ivla/ma'ovla", I make a comment here: CgV in cmevla does not affect lexical analysis, while that in fu'ivla/ma'ovla does. Disallowing CgV in cmevla is very strong restriction. It affects not only traditional names like {nitcion}, or popular names like {tuitr}, but also a standard of lojbanization of words of natural languages. CgV in cmevla sometimes makes things easy. For example, many Chinese names have CgV-like phoneme strings. Chinese "Huan", "Han" and "Hu An" are distinguished from each other. If CgV is disallowed in cmevla, it will be difficult to find out a reasonable standard of lojbanization of them. mu'o -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. ------=_Part_209_1767160052.1418954278075 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
This is reminder and interim report.

The poll will be closed on 2014-12-27 at 0:00 UTC (it might be a f= ew hours later depending on my connection to the Internet.)

<= /div>
http://goo.gl/forms/5KbiK5yBky


Currently, "2. disallow CgV in cmevla/fu'ivla/ma'ovla" is predominant= .

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1kJLBvjkoDpmvA9v= JS_lf8SpCYAZvY4bMx1pj8uhWqRs/viewanalytics



As a supporter of "1.3.1. allow CgV in cmevla, disal= low it in fu'ivla/ma'ovla", I make a comment here:

CgV in cmevla does not affect lexical analysis, while that in fu'ivla/ma'o= vla does. Disallowing CgV in cmevla is very strong restriction. It affects = not only traditional names like {nitcion}, or popular names like {tuitr}, b= ut also a standard of lojbanization of words of natural languages. CgV in c= mevla sometimes makes things easy. For example, many Chinese names have CgV= -like phoneme strings. Chinese "Huan", "Han" and "Hu An" are distinguished = from each other. If CgV is disallowed in cmevla, it will be difficult to fi= nd out a reasonable standard of lojbanization of them.

=
mu'o

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to bpfk-list= +unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at ht= tp://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
------=_Part_209_1767160052.1418954278075-- ------=_Part_208_526913919.1418954278075--