Received: from mail-wi0-f187.google.com ([209.85.212.187]:59057) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1Y3Z7K-0006dv-2i; Tue, 23 Dec 2014 15:43:56 -0800 Received: by mail-wi0-f187.google.com with SMTP id bs8sf668371wib.4; Tue, 23 Dec 2014 15:43:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help :list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=3s49OGbjg4ydowc5MiXGLPuNf73x8JuBMWYqroEJw68=; b=S1OjYo4ivu6+xiHzGidbU0Y5Qo+ifEyG9lC9fz4A1SmS+RN2nHjT5WGLvYZo1mRcIu 7Yb+2LWfHiwuXz1r8cXs3ePHovBBJOgq7Ui4EssrZq42BWZnhDZoBZleH2B5G3Uz/7Xy MfVfgZTQpfHNsxmFd+NDzBco0D/GB2Gq+NKw9PLaacAlDr2CTob4rvjAGmd9YkAzIzgP 1VbkJO9Q2hbQAhis47fR0+qY+9Z4GmHywPAkIkjkHt4ELhNPOWm+5SEcCa3XKH/RyTQk tzVDZow4kyLVBy/c+l7FY1kufS6m3LEY9iTnHwD8Jbx1ZSuCiOoz3YdM9KQ4sW1OZ5Mk O+Cg== X-Received: by 10.152.37.37 with SMTP id v5mr48080laj.14.1419378227130; Tue, 23 Dec 2014 15:43:47 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.152.42.133 with SMTP id o5ls982570lal.78.gmail; Tue, 23 Dec 2014 15:43:46 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.112.188.199 with SMTP id gc7mr1830130lbc.6.1419378226495; Tue, 23 Dec 2014 15:43:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-lb0-x22d.google.com (mail-lb0-x22d.google.com. [2a00:1450:4010:c04::22d]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id oi7si1620966lbb.1.2014.12.23.15.43.46 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 23 Dec 2014 15:43:46 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4010:c04::22d as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:4010:c04::22d; Received: by mail-lb0-f173.google.com with SMTP id z12so6045634lbi.32 for ; Tue, 23 Dec 2014 15:43:46 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.225.166 with SMTP id rl6mr30461016lbc.58.1419378226348; Tue, 23 Dec 2014 15:43:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.78.9 with HTTP; Tue, 23 Dec 2014 15:43:46 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <5499F18D.1010209@gmail.com> References: <5499F18D.1010209@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2014 20:43:46 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [bpfk] pi PA [sumti] From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jorge_Llamb=C3=ADas?= To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11346420fbc8a0050aeabef7 X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4010:c04::22d as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 972099695765 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_bar: - Content-Length: 6369 --001a11346420fbc8a0050aeabef7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 7:49 PM, Ilmen wrote: > =E2=80=A2 http://www.lojban.org/tiki/BPFK+Section:+gadri > > piPA *[sumti]* =3D lo piPA si'e be pa me *[sumti]* > =E2=80=A2 http://www.lojban.org/tiki/BPFK+Section%3A+Numeric+selbri > > *cmavo: si'e (MOI)* > *Proposed Definition* > > Converts a number, lerfu-string or ME-converted sumti into a tanru-unit. > The place structure in the case of a number is *"x1 is/are a *[number]*th > of x2"*. In general for any sumti the place structure is *"x1 is a > part/fraction of x2, quantified by *[number/lerfu/sumti]*"*. > Isn't there a contradiction between the proposed expansion for {pi PA > [sumti]} and the definition of {si'e}? > Shouldn't the former be {*pi PA* [sumti] =3D lo *me li pa fe'i PA me'u* > si'e be...}, or something like that? > The definitions are horribly worded, but "pi mu" is supposed to be one half, or five tenths, not one fifth, and "pi mu si'e" is like "xadba". > Besides, isn't it weird that {pi ro ko'a} has a different meaning from {p= a > ko'a}? > "pi ro ko'a" ("the whole of ko'a") only really makes sense when ko'a is one (and if ko'a happen to be many I think "pi ro" forces a one group interpretation so that a whole can make sense. OTOH, "pa ko'a" ("one of ko'a") only really makes sense when ko'a are more than one, and it's weird if not meaningless when ko'a is one. I would say that when ko'a is one, "pa ko'a" forces a multiplication of ko'a into instances or such. A better definition for "pi PA ko'a" might be something like "lo pi PA si'e be ko'a noi pi ro ke'a pa mei" mu'o mi'e xorxes --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= BPFK" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --001a11346420fbc8a0050aeabef7 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

= On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 7:49 PM, Ilmen <ilmen.pokebip@gmail.com&= gt; wrote:
=20 =20 =20
=E2=80=A2 http://www.lojban.org/tiki/BPFK+Section:+gadri

piPA [sumti]=C2=A0 =3D=C2=A0 lo piPA si'e be pa = me [sumti]

=E2=80=A2 http://www.lojban.org/tiki/BPFK+Section%3A+Numer= ic+selbri

cmavo: si'e (MOI)
Proposed Definition

Converts a number, lerfu-string or ME-converted sumti into a tanru-unit. The place structure in the case of a number is = "x1 is/are a [number]th of x2". In general for any sumti the place structure is "x1 is a part/fractio= n of x2, quantified by [number/lerfu/sumti]"= .

Isn't there a contradiction between the proposed expansion for {pi PA [sumti]} and the definition of {si'e}?
Shouldn't the former be {pi PA [sumti] =3D lo me li pa fe= 'i PA me'u si'e be...}, or something like that?

The definitions are horribly worded, but &quo= t;pi mu" is supposed to be one half, or five tenths, not one fifth, an= d "pi mu si'e" is like "xadba".=C2=A0
=C2= =A0=C2=A0
Besides, isn't it weird that {pi ro ko'a} has a different meani= ng from {pa ko'a}?

"pi = ro ko'a" ("the whole of ko'a") only really makes sen= se when ko'a is one (and if ko'a happen to be many I think "pi= ro" forces a one group interpretation so that a whole can make sense.= OTOH, "pa ko'a" ("one of ko'a") only really ma= kes sense when ko'a are more than one, and it's weird if not meanin= gless when ko'a is one. I would say that when ko'a is one, "pa= ko'a" forces a multiplication of ko'a into instances or such.= =C2=A0

A better definition for "pi PA ko'= a" might be something like "lo pi PA si'e be ko'a noi pi = ro ke'a pa mei"

mu'o mi'e xorxes<= /div>

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to bpfk-list= +unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at ht= tp://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--001a11346420fbc8a0050aeabef7--