2014-12-11 19:30 GMT+03:00 Alex Burka <aburka@seas= .upenn.edu>:

The preprocessor thing doesn't make a ton of sense = to me. Does anyone else support this "dialectal variation"? We do= n't preprocess {ie} to {i'e}, so I don't see the point in chang= ing ?{jie} to {ji'e}. They're quite different sounds, and moreover = different syllable counts, so you'll be complecting the stress and word= segmentation rules as well as breaking audiovisual isomorphism.

As for the larger question, I don= 't have a very strong opinion. I lean towards consistency (that would b= e banning it or allowing it everywhere). If we do allow it, maybe the sibil= ants should still be an exception for ease of pronunciation (I don't ha= ve trouble with ?{guaspi}, but ?{jiespi} and ?{ciaspi} are difficult).

So if we're approval-voting: 1.1.2 + 2. But I'= m open to being convinced otherwise.

mu'o mi&#= 39;e la durkavore

=20
On Thursday, December 11, 2014 a= t 8:41 AM, Gleki Arxokuna wrote:

2014= -12-11 16:16 GMT+03:00 John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>:
Gleki Arxokuna scripsit:

> I vote for this. + I prefer it to be just a synonym (dialect variation= of
> the same sequence but with a {'} inside. co'o zo guaspi

I can live with this, but I'd prefer to ban it altogether.

It depends on in what way should it be= banned.=C2=A0
I vote for banning it from the formal grammar howe= ver, I vote for the preprocessor to be able to autocorrect {jie} back to {j= i'e}. Speech recognition must be able to recognize both variants.
=

--
John Cowan=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 http://www.ccil.org/~cowan=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0 =C2=A0 cowan@ccil.o= rg
Clear?=C2=A0 Huh!=C2=A0 Why a four-year-old child could understand t= his report.
Run out and find me a four-year-old child.=C2=A0 I can't make head or t= ail
out of it.=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 --Rufus T. Firefly on government repo= rts

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

=20 =20 =20 =20
=20

=20
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.