Received: from mail-lb0-f191.google.com ([209.85.217.191]:60655) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1Y0BTX-00073z-Un; Sun, 14 Dec 2014 07:53:01 -0800 Received: by mail-lb0-f191.google.com with SMTP id u10sf907739lbd.28 for ; Sun, 14 Dec 2014 07:52:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help :list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=DbWeJExlVTVkgRLvFmXWWjjGTFDytV+ZTwFakQETGdI=; b=dABIuuWWEf9hZTVr7BxDVAT3GF9WuA7K8n9IC+/osXLUS3t0O1hAFa00/u0qzIBtAd Ebpb4AY+C5fRRLX+wHzDsKIc4up3aUlRglQaIyQZeB2LZEYwKXSnUbDx++0nmwyRE/Dy mCvmkV2LhnlDESZAxn2q/80lg2LnimNBMjSTftKYZ8m06IVMwzu6t5WTxz6lkLt62+eV GDm/lNl/+A1KYbBQerOCFIFWez7VYovEjoA38YowCUxDXkD1kjFkvTi7L2Nz0ifcx8ir I6h9vcXqL0NOE5y7TL2wPPH8p8PfIzmu020NaVPD2sytM/WZTHrjITmpY/OOcHcwRFg9 sZpw== X-Received: by 10.152.246.3 with SMTP id xs3mr116681lac.5.1418572364694; Sun, 14 Dec 2014 07:52:44 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.152.23.229 with SMTP id p5ls672426laf.4.gmail; Sun, 14 Dec 2014 07:52:44 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.112.166.102 with SMTP id zf6mr1276lbb.12.1418572364041; Sun, 14 Dec 2014 07:52:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-la0-x22b.google.com (mail-la0-x22b.google.com. [2a00:1450:4010:c03::22b]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id mu9si652427lbc.0.2014.12.14.07.52.44 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 14 Dec 2014 07:52:44 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4010:c03::22b as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:4010:c03::22b; Received: by mail-la0-f43.google.com with SMTP id s18so8335005lam.30 for ; Sun, 14 Dec 2014 07:52:44 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.5.198 with SMTP id u6mr26329455lau.42.1418572363898; Sun, 14 Dec 2014 07:52:43 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.78.9 with HTTP; Sun, 14 Dec 2014 07:52:43 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20141214025736.GB19927@mercury.ccil.org> References: <548AC3CB.7090403@gmx.de> <580B9AB84B34485AB4139B921C46CF42@gmail.com> <3ED463A548E74A53BD8F2ECEF0C620F8@gmail.com> <14FDADF47D7841A39D612894E81CC89B@gmail.com> <20141214025736.GB19927@mercury.ccil.org> Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2014 12:52:43 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [bpfk] official cmavo form From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jorge_Llamb=C3=ADas?= To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e013d1b6ed6a446050a2f1d76 X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4010:c03::22b as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 972099695765 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_bar: - Content-Length: 5265 --089e013d1b6ed6a446050a2f1d76 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 11:57 PM, John Cowan wrote: > > And Rosta scripsit: > > > That is, it's a bad idea for > > [tuitsku] to be ambiguous between /tu witsku/ and /twitsku/, and that > > ambiguity should be remedied and nullified by forbidding one of them. > > The current prescription forbids both of them: "tuitsku" has the illicit > CgV form, and "tu uitsku" has be [tu?witsku]. But CLL doesn't forbid CgV's in fu'ivla. It has examples such as "saskrkuarka" and "bangrblgaria", so I don't think CLL has a problem with "tuitsku". CLL does forbid "tuuitsku", but due to morphological rather than phonotactic constraints. CLL requires a consonant cluster in the first five letters of a brivla, and it also requires a pause before words beginning with a glide, so for CLL "tuuitsku" is a non-word form much like "slinku'i", phonotactically acceptable but morphologically unanalyzable. CLL would not have a problem with, for example, "blatuuitsku" as a fu'ivla form distinct from "blatuitsku", one with four syllables and the other with three. camxes currently allows both "tuitsku" (a fu'ivla) and "tuuitsku" = "tu uitsku", because camxes doesn't require a pause before words that begin with a glide. I wouldn't have a problem with disallowing CgV, but it is a change from the current official prescription. > Lojban's phonotactics are as arbitrary as every other feature of the > language, and I see no need to liberalize them. In this case the need is to make them more strict. mu'o mi'e xorxes -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --089e013d1b6ed6a446050a2f1d76 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

= On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 11:57 PM, John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org= > wrote:
And Rosta scripsit:
> That is, it's a bad idea for
> [tuitsku] to be ambiguous between /tu witsku/ and /twitsku/, and that<= br> > ambiguity should be remedied and nullified by forbidding one of them.<= br>
The current prescription forbids both of them:=C2=A0 "tuitsku&q= uot; has the illicit
CgV form, and "tu uitsku" has be [tu?witsku].=C2=A0
<= div>
But CLL doesn't forbid CgV's in fu'ivla. It = has examples such as "saskrkuarka" and "bangrblgaria", = so I don't think CLL has a problem with "tuitsku".=C2=A0

CLL does forbid "tuuitsku", but due to morph= ological rather than phonotactic constraints. CLL requires a consonant clus= ter in the first five letters of a brivla, and it also requires a pause bef= ore words beginning with a glide, so for CLL "tuuitsku" is a non-= word form much like "slinku'i", phonotactically acceptable bu= t morphologically unanalyzable. CLL would not have a problem with, for exam= ple, "blatuuitsku" as a fu'ivla form distinct from "blat= uitsku", one with four syllables and the other with three.
<= br>
camxes currently allows both "tuitsku" (a fu'iv= la) =C2=A0and "tuuitsku" =3D "tu uitsku", because camxe= s doesn't require a pause before words that begin with a glide. I would= n't have a problem with disallowing CgV, but it is a change from the cu= rrent official prescription.
=C2=A0
Lojban's phonotactics are as arbitrary as every other feature of the language, and I see no need to liberalize them.

=
In this case the need is to make them more strict.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to bpfk-list= +unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at ht= tp://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--089e013d1b6ed6a446050a2f1d76--