Received: from mail-wg0-f60.google.com ([74.125.82.60]:64647) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1YCp59-0001s1-8c; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 04:35:56 -0800 Received: by mail-wg0-f60.google.com with SMTP id k14sf2338585wgh.5; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 04:35:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help :list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=bueZjg82/JNW2ZTt32XwlXZJG3MxiygpmI+zpBx/2lA=; b=eZ+WAixjYRsFqxLzD/vBtbHNdZrUJILObLq3G/3kBa2vmTKOsefeGDdNBkUoKEzvF5 XsGBVVfXKmJWhhmVJXXwhGXoOp+P1Z3BtZJoesg4AgKQuXJWx3cdvaAuQaax4FfNDP9W VdOLHfOzOswntfpFLETSm8o3vZ5OdRDFD6dfBQ8BkaDvmQyZSl1w7J0j2tqdBtIMNQSv IT0e0884KsUd1YihOppiweEyr6CEsXBzJgWbJYmo2pCUPKrQIuTQjwvB7sQ4IlrKnQ+e qkAS8JfNxzjOBJETcNc/kl8Y3Q6riXBgzNJ1v20X5P2jJXNbwIkbiQnSh3JThTJ0+W+J bCmw== X-Received: by 10.152.246.3 with SMTP id xs3mr83793lac.5.1421584548516; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 04:35:48 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.152.36.100 with SMTP id p4ls542356laj.24.gmail; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 04:35:47 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.112.89.36 with SMTP id bl4mr2962485lbb.1.1421584547880; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 04:35:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-we0-x236.google.com (mail-we0-x236.google.com. [2a00:1450:400c:c03::236]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ne15si451350wic.2.2015.01.18.04.35.47 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 18 Jan 2015 04:35:47 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c03::236 as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:400c:c03::236; Received: by mail-we0-f182.google.com with SMTP id l61so1813726wev.13 for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 04:35:47 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.181.27.199 with SMTP id ji7mr24959045wid.76.1421584547755; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 04:35:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.27.172.19 with HTTP; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 04:35:47 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <1542202.keDLaaAaEP@caracal> <11D6D88424D845468B4AE0CD576DF135@gmail.com> <20150118080745.GK14149@mercury.ccil.org> Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 09:35:47 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [bpfk] Month Names (WAS: official cmavo form) From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jorge_Llamb=C3=ADas?= To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11348266fcbd0d050cec7191 X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c03::236 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 972099695765 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.8 X-Spam_score_int: 8 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 5:10 AM, Alex Burka wrote: > {ga .i'amsi} requires the pause, if I'm not mistaken. It seems as easy to > distinguish {gai'amsi} from {ga .i'amsi} as {dai} from {da .i}. > [...] Content analysis details: (0.8 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: googlegroups.com] 2.7 DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL RBL: Envelope sender listed in dnsbl.ahbl.org [listed in googlegroups.com.rhsbl.ahbl.org. IN] [A] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 RBL: Good reputation (+3) [74.125.82.60 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 0.0 T_HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (jjllambias[at]gmail.com) 0.0 DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED No valid author signature, adsp_override is CUSTOM_MED 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid 0.0 T_FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN 2nd level domains in From and EnvelopeFrom freemail headers are different -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders Content-Length: 3246 --001a11348266fcbd0d050cec7191 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 5:10 AM, Alex Burka wrote: > {ga .i'amsi} requires the pause, if I'm not mistaken. It seems as easy to > distinguish {gai'amsi} from {ga .i'amsi} as {dai} from {da .i}. > Also "ai'amsi" would pass the five letter rule, so that's not a valid justification for it. I take the five letter rule as an observation about lujvo (and gismu obviously), not as a requirement for all brivla. If the necessary conditions for brivla listed by CLL were also sufficient conditions, it might make sense to accept them as necessary even if arbitrary, but since they are not sufficient, it doesn't make sense to impose them as necessary for no reason. mu'o mi'e xorxes -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --001a11348266fcbd0d050cec7191 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 5:10 AM, Alex Burka <aburka@seas.upenn.edu= > wrote:
{ga .i'amsi} requires the pause, if I'm not mis= taken. It seems as easy to distinguish {gai'amsi} from {ga .i'amsi}= as {dai} from {da .i}.

Also "ai= 'amsi" would pass the five letter rule, so that's not a valid = justification for it. I take the five letter rule as an observation about l= ujvo (and gismu obviously), not as a requirement for all brivla. =C2=A0

If the necessary conditions for brivla listed by CLL = were also sufficient conditions, it might make sense to accept them as nece= ssary even if arbitrary, but since they are not sufficient, it doesn't = make sense to impose them as necessary for no reason.

<= div>mu'o mi'e xorxes

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to bpfk-list= +unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at ht= tp://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--001a11348266fcbd0d050cec7191--