Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of selckiku@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4010:c04::236 as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:4010:c04::236;
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <54BEFD5E.7030805@gmx.de>
References: <54BEFD5E.7030805@gmx.de>
From: Stela Selckiku <selckiku@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 21:31:47 -0500
Message-ID: <CAJHgu=_Bk8vJU+R7Ryd1uzUmAA5VgFsgKzW5_B5M8S5LS5=7GQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [bpfk] ju'o / ju'o nai
To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1133aab23dfa08050d205d94
Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com
Sender: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
X-Spam_score: 0.8
X-Spam_score_int: 8
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details.
 
 Content preview:  I never ever ever see anyone use the definition that the ma'oste
    seems to assert, which is is that it's in UI*5, it's a modifier. Even though
    no one ever ever says that I obediently rationalized that in the Lojban in
    my mind. In my mind, people say "ju'o" all the time because they're always
    eliding a UI before it, possibly ".ia" or "je'u" or something. Yeah "je'u"
    feels right. I always imagine, ridiculously enough, that because the ma'oste
    says it's a modifier, that what people mean when they say "ju'o cu'i" is
   actually "je'u ju'o cu'i"-- that this is the truth, I'm of indeterminate certainty.
    [...] 
 
 Content analysis details:   (0.8 points, 5.0 required)
 
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
  0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED          ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked.
                             See
                             http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
                              for more information.
                             [URIs: googlegroups.com]
  2.7 DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL    RBL: Envelope sender listed in dnsbl.ahbl.org
                             [listed in googlegroups.com.rhsbl.ahbl.org.	IN]
                             [A]
  0.0 T_HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail
                             domains are different
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
  0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM          Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
                             (selckiku[at]gmail.com)
  0.0 DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED   No valid author signature, adsp_override is
                             CUSTOM_MED
  0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
 -1.9 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
                             [score: 0.0000]
 -0.1 DKIM_VALID             Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
  0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid
 -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3      RBL: Good reputation (+3)
                             [74.125.83.62 listed in wl.mailspike.net]
  0.0 T_FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN 2nd level domains in From and
                             EnvelopeFrom freemail headers are different
 -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL      Mailspike good senders
Content-Length: 3268

--001a1133aab23dfa08050d205d94
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

I never ever ever see anyone use the definition that the ma'oste seems to
assert, which is is that it's in UI*5, it's a modifier. Even though no one
ever ever says that I obediently rationalized that in the Lojban in my
mind. In my mind, people say "ju'o" all the time because they're always
eliding a UI before it, possibly ".ia" or "je'u" or something. Yeah "je'u"
feels right. I always imagine, ridiculously enough, that because the
ma'oste says it's a modifier, that what people mean when they say "ju'o
cu'i" is actually "je'u ju'o cu'i"-- that this is the truth, I'm of
indeterminate certainty.

I don't care how we rationalize it. If I can't have one syllable that means
"maybe" I'm going to take one of the two-syllables, there's plenty left in
the CVV'V shape isn't there? No reason why not, no reason anymore these
days.

<3,
selkik

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--001a1133aab23dfa08050d205d94
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div><div><div><br></div>I never ever ever see anyone use =
the definition that the ma&#39;oste seems to assert, which is is that it=
9;s in UI*5, it&#39;s a modifier. Even though no one ever ever says that I =
obediently rationalized that in the Lojban in my mind. In my mind, people s=
ay &quot;ju&#39;o&quot; all the time because they&#39;re always eliding a U=
I before it, possibly &quot;.ia&quot; or &quot;je&#39;u&quot; or something.=
 Yeah &quot;je&#39;u&quot; feels right. I always imagine, ridiculously enou=
gh, that because the ma&#39;oste says it&#39;s a modifier, that what people=
 mean when they say &quot;ju&#39;o cu&#39;i&quot; is actually &quot;je&#39;=
u ju&#39;o cu&#39;i&quot;-- that this is the truth, I&#39;m of indeterminat=
e certainty. <br><br></div>I don&#39;t care how we rationalize it. If I can=
&#39;t have one syllable that means &quot;maybe&quot; I&#39;m going to take=
 one of the two-syllables, there&#39;s plenty left in the CVV&#39;V shape i=
sn&#39;t there? No reason why not, no reason anymore these days. <br><br>&l=
t;3,<br></div>selkik<br></div>

<p></p>

-- <br />
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &=
quot;BPFK&quot; group.<br />
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e=
mail to <a href=3D"mailto:bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com">bpfk-list=
+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com</a>.<br />
To post to this group, send email to <a href=3D"mailto:bpfk-list@googlegrou=
ps.com">bpfk-list@googlegroups.com</a>.<br />
Visit this group at <a href=3D"http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list">ht=
tp://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list</a>.<br />
For more options, visit <a href=3D"https://groups.google.com/d/optout">http=
s://groups.google.com/d/optout</a>.<br />

--001a1133aab23dfa08050d205d94--