Received: from mail-yh0-f60.google.com ([209.85.213.60]:45445) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1YCSTq-000488-No; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 04:27:55 -0800 Received: by mail-yh0-f60.google.com with SMTP id t59sf3551760yho.5; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 04:27:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe; bh=YA5tJG532soHXKG21DQh3mt7w/iDSqyJQy2gab+BExI=; b=Nzw+eYjwd2jZ80MYOqxof80Ms+aAQXAF+NjrDpCs8zqMRoBQcF6SILVaQsDybwni92 WpknpxXLDurm1OeA7SveHOiCBODorsOtb8T+9PeHgjEq2lMdvWWPgF7VcOHgFgxQSMRa fS4F/l20Kho+MI7Ea5fN5ctPap9ibGSwGp6K/CFHpudzVKFcrJBJrcan0JdtiJGFaEWe mG3NCauSUKA38/uErcaYAhARXoPjzac0pd7chFRzoR0900IjwkMf6mFhp65Z5dsv/gdV eBzXkVYph3GvrHjc7iec1S5lv0leDU05LT8PDgHHgNDcymCcOsKoAsfjyqP652xXrQT1 cCiw== X-Received: by 10.50.78.133 with SMTP id b5mr136300igx.4.1421497668291; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 04:27:48 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.50.20.161 with SMTP id o1ls762883ige.18.canary; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 04:27:48 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.66.181.136 with SMTP id dw8mr15318933pac.27.1421497668116; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 04:27:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-ie0-x230.google.com (mail-ie0-x230.google.com. [2607:f8b0:4001:c03::230]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id qj12si433638igc.2.2015.01.17.04.27.48 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 17 Jan 2015 04:27:48 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of maikxlx@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4001:c03::230 as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:4001:c03::230; Received: by mail-ie0-f176.google.com with SMTP id tr6so24910342ieb.7 for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 04:27:48 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.18.49 with SMTP id t17mr8745845igd.3.1421497667973; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 04:27:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.107.173.227 with HTTP; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 04:27:47 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 07:27:47 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [bpfk] Month Names (WAS: official cmavo form) From: "Mike S." To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Original-Sender: maikxlx@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of maikxlx@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4001:c03::230 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=maikxlx@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 972099695765 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: 2.8 (++) X-Spam_score: 2.8 X-Spam_score_int: 28 X-Spam_bar: ++ X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 1:00 AM, Gleki Arxokuna wrote: > > > 2015-01-17 0:59 GMT+03:00 Mike S. : >> >> .janu'ári'us. .febru'ári'us. .márti'us. .aprílis. .máius. (ja .május.) >> .júni'us. .júli'us. .augústus. .septémber. .október. .novémber. >> .decémber. > > > How would you say "Every February" using these? [...] Content analysis details: (2.8 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: googlegroups.com] 2.7 DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL RBL: Envelope sender listed in dnsbl.ahbl.org [listed in googlegroups.com.rhsbl.ahbl.org. IN] [A] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 RBL: Good reputation (+3) [209.85.213.60 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 0.0 T_HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (maikxlx[at]gmail.com) 0.0 DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED No valid author signature, adsp_override is CUSTOM_MED -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid 2.0 LONGWORDS Long string of long words 0.0 T_FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN 2nd level domains in From and EnvelopeFrom freemail headers are different -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders Content-Length: 2633 On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 1:00 AM, Gleki Arxokuna wrote: > > > 2015-01-17 0:59 GMT+03:00 Mike S. : >> >> .janu'=C3=A1ri'us. .febru'=C3=A1ri'us. .m=C3=A1rti'us. .apr=C3=ADlis. .m= =C3=A1ius. (ja .m=C3=A1jus.) >> .j=C3=BAni'us. .j=C3=BAli'us. .aug=C3=BAstus. .sept=C3=A9mber. .okt=C3= =B3ber. .nov=C3=A9mber. >> .dec=C3=A9mber. > > > How would you say "Every February" using these? {[ca] ro la .febru'=C3=A1ri'us.} >> On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 9:09 AM, Gleki Arxokuna >> wrote: >> > >> > >> > 2015-01-16 16:47 GMT+03:00 Pierre Abbat : >> >> >> >> "madjio" is from Italian. >> > >> > >> > And that's what I don't like. I suppose names should follow some syste= m, >> > not >> > be arbitrarily taken from different languages within one set of words >> > (then >> > why not Lojbanize Italian "gennaio" and so on?). >> >> Most likely he used Italian simply because the Latin for "May" namely >> "maius/maio-" is insufficiently crunchy for brivla. IMO Latin would >> be the right language to Lojbanize here. But, it seems impossible to >> import the full Latin month names recognizably into fu'ivla space. So >> maybe the suffix idea is the way to go... >> >> janmese febmese marmese prilmese magmese junmese julmese > > > ke'u, jun- and jul- are too close and can be easily mixed together. Do you find {lo} and {no} to be easy to mix together too, or is the issue specifically [n]/[l] after a vowel? The Romans and the heirs of their language had no problem with this, mind you; Junius/Julius are pronounced exactly the same way in all forms except for the one segment in question. By the way, this concerns a third set of Lojbanic month names; I was thinking that the main purpose of having this set at all was to match the Latinate forms as much as possible; otherwise, what's the point. My revised suggestion: janvari febvari martime prilme magjome junxame julzeme .avgusto septebe .oktobe novmebe dekmere IMHO these work as recognizable loans (barely) if you squint a bit (or a lot), but I still prefer the relative fidelity of cmene form, especially if cmevla and brivla are intended to be syntactically merged some day. --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= BPFK" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.