Received: from mail-wi0-f192.google.com ([209.85.212.192]:32807) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1.2:AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1Yatmr-0006TW-4T; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 15:28:37 -0700 Received: by wiwh11 with SMTP id h11sf17221548wiw.0; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 15:28:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help :list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=7Yr1oC/1H1UOV9niD4YhYDahH93RbUmFkKUaqA1ZuKU=; b=Bn5TAEwr3vD/zNTTR/+bSp9BNBzE31/bEyFbgk24E22Dxeck6FsJBshpHckaaft0fE 7GH2Q3mJDcSYEzQ3vFsha6c280anhvasjwGEhYcOmcDyKQ/n24MM0HQlzYGBh9XJMZtd I7SfGHwDSUrXlQGyRk9W4uHz14XMBXyPW91ZWzQVBm/6C9yCqzTCjagSTwJFX5EUMZCN 9iAHlgdBIpNga7eW8fFJiXPbFVmoqlIvQngNnigtMVImBaJnx+540KH4ZGlvOM1PjGlX 4Jhe13FQnzqdOtPvIwKz57VbQgh42CnqF1jtKR2O/9uMhf0r1+sH7AQt0V4b121pCM89 v2/g== X-Received: by 10.152.116.115 with SMTP id jv19mr185151lab.32.1427322506085; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 15:28:26 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.152.37.194 with SMTP id a2ls155953lak.88.gmail; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 15:28:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.152.27.134 with SMTP id t6mr2596915lag.5.1427322505449; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 15:28:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wg0-x22e.google.com (mail-wg0-x22e.google.com. [2a00:1450:400c:c00::22e]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o3si1027625wib.2.2015.03.25.15.28.25 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 25 Mar 2015 15:28:25 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c00::22e as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:400c:c00::22e; Received: by mail-wg0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id cc7so43511447wgb.0 for ; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 15:28:25 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.7.194 with SMTP id l2mr42381134wia.39.1427322505320; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 15:28:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.27.86.219 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 15:28:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 19:28:25 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [bpfk] Fighting copy-pasting in PEG From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jorge_Llamb=C3=ADas?= To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=90e6ba614138e8deea0512246a37 X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c00::22e as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 972099695765 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.6 X-Spam_score_int: -15 X-Spam_bar: - Content-Length: 4048 --90e6ba614138e8deea0512246a37 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Gleki Arxokuna wrote: > > Here, "KE_clause free*" is used 11 times in PEG and even when "free*" > doesn't follow KE_clause it could. > Why not move "free*" into KE_clause itself ? This would make the grammar > easier. > "free" could be in "post-clause" together with "indicators", and then you would need to create a special post-clause-light for the few selma'o that can't take free as modifier (PA, BY, tenses and connectives, I think). Most occurences of "free" are after a selma'o clause. > "free*" is used ~200 times in the grammar. I'm sure this number can be > lowered significantly. > To just one if "free*" was allowed wherever "indicators" are. The rationale for the restrictions on "free" was never very clear to me. mu'o mi'e xorxes -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --90e6ba614138e8deea0512246a37 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

= On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.nam= e@gmail.com> wrote:

Here, "KE_clause free*" is used 11 times in PEG and even when "free*" doesn&#= 39;t follow=C2=A0KE_clause it c= ould.
Why not move &q= uot;free*" into KE_clause itself ? This would make the grammar easier.=

"free" could = be in "post-clause" together with "indicators", and the= n you would need to create a special post-clause-light for the few selma= 9;o that can't take free as modifier (PA, BY, tenses and connectives, I= think). Most occurences of "free" are after a selma'o clause= .
=C2=A0
"free*" is used ~200 times in the gramm= ar. I'm sure this number can be lowered significantly.

To just one if "free*" was all= owed wherever "indicators" are. The rationale for the restriction= s on "free" was never very clear to me.
=C2=A0
mu'o mi'e xorxes

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to bpfk-list= +unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at ht= tp://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--90e6ba614138e8deea0512246a37--