Received: from mail-vn0-f63.google.com ([209.85.216.63]:33849) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1.2:AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1YjHmf-0000aw-Ak; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 18:43:05 -0700 Received: by vnbf62 with SMTP id f62sf24111025vnb.1; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 18:42:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :content-type:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe; bh=B8ZryYAqbnAbBG7dkK1toatUPy14Ppmr/A6BBCn5BPA=; b=nfclhGkw7RT82MVJwmFnageluxpvRyAoxWP0Kw4YjFQ9+Vrs3NfrNhoy8AG37c7y3g RPFgCf1MTlHn/DYiR2Y8q91KAqQzMJFedXpeUxMYx/xsxgDF2pLFQiICew3ohGML415x qm4jNEv5x4yI9azour0zA7/HsLn37Xg4hWzM03xYtBiFpfJZZZzwmVFEWuByOMefsXlj EXCmlJz/rPs8eqHTfyUch1l7FedfUcMLRasX93vvCRC1v2aOA6qYS53Fa7RUsdphuhcW rT0zeFbS+OXMliIuifsj0EVIpuwep2HvLNM6XcjfaQXm3qViX+8sVPEntlbovCVcSkvO JShg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :content-type:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe; bh=B8ZryYAqbnAbBG7dkK1toatUPy14Ppmr/A6BBCn5BPA=; b=axmXJGA+zqYTKmHcXhQqpfUWKGMfAB7qcpr5FpoIzz6nfrF/WTZWFM+zHkT8K6WEYR M8MZ0VXYflg1HtV+G2Ih4J9vBe2E778BVOFzpLIm3DX9aA+oedTGOx1QeDpeWeoJcz6u sdubGOw4ogSyD61nsJPlBREM2b8i9uGboyE5ws/MFoP9DYgoyFUU0xOTW4SMFZ/LVWj8 KZfBSvCP47eoNu821/u87NP+90EqtqlTzJ0DK/WXwRl6Ei5LPbZyz/RL5OPeTOlupo8f d+9TU+IaYZInUjp0z/Nf1TIsD66DoBkDndNgbzBlo8vTohBMq+KfgU80w/6yvvWFmLmO OM2A== X-Received: by 10.50.25.199 with SMTP id e7mr125053igg.16.1429321374844; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 18:42:54 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.50.102.38 with SMTP id fl6ls427757igb.34.gmail; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 18:42:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.50.3.105 with SMTP id b9mr125999igb.15.1429321374587; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 18:42:54 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 18:42:53 -0700 (PDT) From: mukti To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Message-Id: <826904a5-ffa3-41d8-82d8-ca277ab0be73@googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: References: <3a950976-061b-4c16-a533-431c1ffbc829@googlegroups.com> <6186523.Zc97XNv9L4@caracal> Subject: Re: [bpfk] Re: official cmavo form MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_Part_17_1497817581.1429321373129" X-Original-Sender: shunpiker@gmail.com Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 972099695765 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.7 X-Spam_score_int: -16 X-Spam_bar: - Content-Length: 7398 ------=_Part_17_1497817581.1429321373129 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_18_1016773733.1429321373130" ------=_Part_18_1016773733.1429321373130 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 ilmentufa/camxes appears to be missing a few of the changes to BPFK morphology that were made since October, specifically: * v121: change to "glide" * v132: change to "consontantal_syllable" * v133: change to "stressed_hy_rafsi" If there's any difference between the parse which is not attributable to one of these changes, then it's a bug. However, at least some of the differences are due to these rule changes. What's wrong with these two? There's no CGV in them. "bad,nr,gru,te" and > "bak,nr,ze,bu". > > I agree. These parse in my local camxes. Can you look into this, mukti? > {badnrgrute} and {baknrzebu} both parse without the change to the consonantal syllable rule in v132. > > catnrpepiskopo > > What's wrong with this? > > I don't know. mukti, can you debug this one as well? > Also due to change in v132. {cipnrpika}, {gurnrtefi} and many others are in the same category. Are people familiar with the theory behind this change? Is it acceptable? Or is there a reason that it was not propagated? If it's not something that we want to keep, the BPFK morphology algorithm page should be updated to reflect that. On a related note, this might be a good time to start discussing the migration of the official BPFK work pages to the mediawiki. I'll refrain from propagating these changes to jbovlaste/vlatai until there's a sense of what should be done. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. ------=_Part_18_1016773733.1429321373130 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
ilmentufa/camxes appears to be missing a few of the c= hanges to BPFK morphology that were made since October, specifically:

* v133: change to "stressed_hy_rafsi"

If there's any difference between the parse which is= not attributable to one of these changes, then it's a bug. However, at lea= st some of the differences are due to these rule changes.

What's wrong with these two? There's no CGV in them. "bad,nr,gru,te" and<= span> 
"bak,nr,ze,bu". 
=

I agree. These parse in my local camxes. Can you look= into this, mukti?

 {badnrgrute} and {= baknrzebu} both parse without the change to the consonantal syllable rule i= n v132.
<= div>
> catnrpepiskopo 

What's= wrong with this? 
<= p>I don't know. mukti, can you debug this one as well?

Also due to change in v132. {cipnrpika}, {gurnrtefi} and many = others are in the same category.

Are people famili= ar with the theory behind this change? Is it acceptable? Or is there a reas= on that it was not propagated? If it's not something that we want to keep, = the BPFK morphology algorithm page should be updated to reflect that. On a = related note, this might be a good time to start discussing the migration o= f the official BPFK work pages to the mediawiki.

I= 'll refrain from propagating these changes to jbovlaste/vlatai until there'= s a sense of what should be done.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to bpfk-list= +unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at ht= tp://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
------=_Part_18_1016773733.1429321373130-- ------=_Part_17_1497817581.1429321373129--