Received: from mail-qc0-f183.google.com ([209.85.216.183]:33878) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1.2:AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1YjtV5-0007gc-HW; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 10:59:25 -0700 Received: by qcrw7 with SMTP id w7sf32461470qcr.1; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 10:59:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :content-type:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe; bh=7FsYbJqdVcPAO+Mx0rjZXaDF+z6VpPYqDoZEy5iYozo=; b=VTf8dLJdBg9lR7odEvyIUXK/IWbhypXoqojdtWpdnKfMOf5zPI4lChW8sYBxHhiZra 7tB7thz0747eQW6lmROf7JIngO+RFTc292w1K+fH43x9dK89+pzezADwhXjr8Rq8N6Cv zKk4rjYJtAsSpnSXzP9ufkF64IX9GfCpGz1E5AHSmGWspoM6f0sToDFYxLpivBMlo/zx xciD2oeARf+J7uHoN42iCccu6se11Xm2lEE+SJBCnqcq/l4MKQTHIEKbEG4SRav2xeZ0 32yHRNuzJ4+xgVMYycFcVxZEh6+weqdSExk1Ug+xf8is0kMxJSBdRSocmNYR1bDNRQ2W YddQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :content-type:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe; bh=7FsYbJqdVcPAO+Mx0rjZXaDF+z6VpPYqDoZEy5iYozo=; b=Llhu9hmpIxlUSNII5VKz38mbioLV9bH+HsaUQmOKWJD1Oee5EmcJ/fJmjxZTBlrjep evE4m3Nr6HDmctU/DQ5MNXH2EVx/m/U2YzxUmt7HIq44ypqmP76RMDm+8LA+smRuCMhQ c3eXZzqDIEaKzflC7rsTPspUpIx8gCy0ESW1e1qyD4ljed4gIKPuCNtqmOk0FEkhxgJt 9Rpml0RccJGFUvHCtfCVD18GadH+4tfA/6plCNqJVp9FMWEBp9x6j9OORumPacTo8J74 WJMW3EwNbcehLaulvH89VV8jKtaXHG6pEmEzGQrpZOoJhrf+odZpMTtObRZ32xm+Ioeq 5QXw== X-Received: by 10.50.22.34 with SMTP id a2mr232473igf.12.1429466357083; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 10:59:17 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.50.66.227 with SMTP id i3ls771769igt.24.canary; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 10:59:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.50.22.34 with SMTP id a2mr232472igf.12.1429466356949; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 10:59:16 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2015 10:59:15 -0700 (PDT) From: mukti To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Message-Id: <09e1983d-5985-422b-96c1-71be8027a78a@googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: References: <3a950976-061b-4c16-a533-431c1ffbc829@googlegroups.com> <6186523.Zc97XNv9L4@caracal> <826904a5-ffa3-41d8-82d8-ca277ab0be73@googlegroups.com> <28352dca-af8f-4852-913c-658ed7969125@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: [bpfk] Re: official cmavo form MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_Part_2979_2112002799.1429466355841" X-Original-Sender: shunpiker@gmail.com Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 972099695765 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: -1.8 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.8 X-Spam_score_int: -17 X-Spam_bar: - Content-Length: 4448 ------=_Part_2979_2112002799.1429466355841 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_2980_673841530.1429466355841" ------=_Part_2980_673841530.1429466355841 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Thanks, durka! I'm willing to proceed in whichever direction BPFK indicates, i.e. marking the non-conforming words as obsolete, or applying changes to the words so that they conform. re: gleki's suggestion, once the changes have been applied for v135 (or v112951 per LMW), I'd be glad to consider a similar revision to the list of words marked obsolete by previous changes to the morphological rules. On Sunday, April 19, 2015 at 9:18:17 AM UTC-8, la durka wrote: > > This spreadsheet > shows > the words invalidated by the CGV rule and two possible ways to > automatically fix them: replacing {xua} with {xuua} (CVGV) or with {xu'a} > (CV'V), discounting words where that doesn't help (because the result is a > tosmabru or a lujvo, for example). I am not saying we should apply a > blanket fix without looking through the words, but it's useful to have this > list to look at. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. ------=_Part_2980_673841530.1429466355841 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Thanks, durka! I'm willing to proceed in whichever dir= ection BPFK indicates, i.e. marking the non-conforming words as obsolete, o= r applying changes to the words so that they conform. re: gleki's suggestio= n, once the changes have been applied for v135 (or v112951 per LMW), I'd be= glad to consider a similar revision to the list of words marked obsolete b= y previous changes to the morphological rules. 

On Sunday, Apri= l 19, 2015 at 9:18:17 AM UTC-8, la durka wrote:
This spre= adsheet shows the words invalidated by the CGV rule and two = possible ways to automatically fix them: replacing {xua} with {xuua} (CVGV)= or with {xu'a} (CV'V), discounting words where that doesn't help (because = the result is a tosmabru or a lujvo, for example). I am not saying we shoul= d apply a blanket fix without looking through the words, but it's useful to= have this list to look at.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to bpfk-list= +unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at ht= tp://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
------=_Part_2980_673841530.1429466355841-- ------=_Part_2979_2112002799.1429466355841--