Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c05::22a as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:400c:c05::22a;
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <etPan.55382c18.706d9b62.ccaf@seas0818.wireless-pennnet.upenn.edu>
References: <etPan.55382c18.706d9b62.ccaf@seas0818.wireless-pennnet.upenn.edu>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 20:30:24 -0300
Message-ID: <CAO7tK2eRM4QaFQ3OOK39U++Q9tsR9_++CcZAvip37rKa8JjCYQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [bpfk] tagged termsets
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jorge_Llamb=C3=ADas?= <jjllambias@gmail.com>
To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b86dae21f33150514588cbf
Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com
Sender: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
X-Spam_score: -2.3
X-Spam_score_int: -22
X-Spam_bar: --
Content-Length: 4856

--047d7b86dae21f33150514588cbf
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 8:17 PM, Alex Burka <durka42@gmail.com> wrote:

> I apologize if I'm bringing up a sore subject that's been discussed
> before.
>

I don't remember this being discussed before.


> But I found a parsing difference between jbofi'e and camxes:
>
> Text in question: {bai nu'i ge da gi de}, i.e. a forethought termset
> inside (or so I thought) a modal tag
>
> jbofi'e output: (0[{bai <nu'i (1[ge da gi de] NU'U)1>} VAU])0
> camxes output: ([{bai KU} {nu'i ge da NUhU gi de NUhU}] VAU)
>

Clearly a bug in jbofi'e. A termset is a set (sequence) of terms, and terms
are already tagged, they cannot be tagged a second time.


> Apparently, jbofi'e regards the termset as inside the modal, while camxes
> doesn't. This seems quite significant, since if I added a selbri {bai nu'i
> ge da gi de broda}, the x1 of broda is either {zo'e} or {da}+{de},
> depending on whether the termset is encapsulated by the modal or not.
>

YACC/EBNF grammar agrees with camxes.

Is this a known parsing difference? Is it related to gek-termsets? Do I
> simply still not understand termsets?
>

I don't think it's related to gek-termsets, no.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--047d7b86dae21f33150514588cbf
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><br><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quo=
te">On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 8:17 PM, Alex Burka <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a hr=
ef=3D"mailto:durka42@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">durka42@gmail.com</a>&gt;=
</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .=
8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div style=3D"word-wrap:br=
eak-word">I apologize if I&#39;m bringing up a sore subject that&#39;s been=
 discussed before. </div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I don&#39;t remem=
ber this being discussed before.</div><div>=C2=A0</div><blockquote class=3D=
"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding=
-left:1ex"><div style=3D"word-wrap:break-word">But I found a parsing differ=
ence between jbofi&#39;e and camxes:<div><br></div><div>Text in question: {=
bai nu&#39;i ge da gi de}, i.e. a forethought termset inside (or so I thoug=
ht) a modal tag</div><div><br></div><div>jbofi&#39;e output:=C2=A0(0[{bai &=
lt;nu&#39;i (1[ge da gi de] NU&#39;U)1&gt;} VAU])0</div><div>camxes output:=
=C2=A0([{bai KU} {nu&#39;i ge da NUhU gi de NUhU}] VAU)</div></div></blockq=
uote><div><br></div><div>Clearly a bug in jbofi&#39;e. A termset is a set (=
sequence) of terms, and terms are already tagged, they cannot be tagged a s=
econd time.=C2=A0</div><div>=C2=A0</div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" s=
tyle=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div=
 style=3D"word-wrap:break-word"><div>Apparently, jbofi&#39;e regards the te=
rmset as inside the modal, while camxes doesn&#39;t. This seems quite signi=
ficant, since if I added a selbri {bai nu&#39;i ge da gi de broda}, the x1 =
of broda is either {zo&#39;e} or {da}+{de}, depending on whether the termse=
t is encapsulated by the modal or not.</div></div></blockquote><div><br></d=
iv><div>YACC/EBNF grammar agrees with camxes.=C2=A0</div><div><br></div><bl=
ockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #=
ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div style=3D"word-wrap:break-word"><div>Is thi=
s a known parsing difference? Is it related to gek-termsets? Do I simply st=
ill not understand termsets?</div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I =
don&#39;t think it&#39;s related to gek-termsets, no.</div><div><br></div><=
div>mu&#39;o mi&#39;e xorxes</div><div><br></div></div></div></div>

<p></p>

-- <br />
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &=
quot;BPFK&quot; group.<br />
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e=
mail to <a href=3D"mailto:bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com">bpfk-list=
+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com</a>.<br />
To post to this group, send email to <a href=3D"mailto:bpfk-list@googlegrou=
ps.com">bpfk-list@googlegroups.com</a>.<br />
Visit this group at <a href=3D"http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list">ht=
tp://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list</a>.<br />
For more options, visit <a href=3D"https://groups.google.com/d/optout">http=
s://groups.google.com/d/optout</a>.<br />

--047d7b86dae21f33150514588cbf--