Received: from mail-qk0-f191.google.com ([209.85.220.191]:32862) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1.2:AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1YzsxD-0004MO-Td; Tue, 02 Jun 2015 13:38:34 -0700 Received: by qkby64 with SMTP id y64sf41595865qkb.0; Tue, 02 Jun 2015 13:38:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :content-type:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help :list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=PbSgy9+qoImkyNjb+yrAED2V/q8JOZwLQJy6DtU6h2E=; b=U7RXsidzxpEV5fVThgyoNym2xnkhcEh6gWj9uFbHKdtHEFklzlUuKFvp4riU0BEcvs 1Z2QYaSCiBld4zqssHVNWzIqD1L9ydNoH1xaRGKBz4jTmGcvyaNI3gx2x8HsMW4F4dH6 KZ80fVuJeevb/BCV0xCvCfynMT9ibVl/lHLWQlZweOjIdCRxy06jvPy2etBiZiRi5pUy gjxqjI1a1dQY0V/uB2Ck39h0TctoeA3tC4KG6XN9l11NlC6gRtqIQ9zdM+sQTG2LnJW1 zyQCeTsWewwGpEkOOJFXf3jXjRTsE8VGmjxA+scQ2aDM+DOuo1rN+EHwlMDt7pxw7US8 dd4g== X-Received: by 10.140.46.98 with SMTP id j89mr361910qga.13.1433277505739; Tue, 02 Jun 2015 13:38:25 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.140.43.181 with SMTP id e50ls3056922qga.6.gmail; Tue, 02 Jun 2015 13:38:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.236.27.13 with SMTP id d13mr38761254yha.43.1433277505576; Tue, 02 Jun 2015 13:38:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-vn0-x235.google.com (mail-vn0-x235.google.com. [2607:f8b0:400c:c0f::235]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fg5si512509vdb.1.2015.06.02.13.38.25 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 02 Jun 2015 13:38:25 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of durka42@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400c:c0f::235 as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:400c:c0f::235; Received: by mail-vn0-x235.google.com with SMTP id g129so22267606vnb.11 for ; Tue, 02 Jun 2015 13:38:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.52.142.169 with SMTP id rx9mr40624183vdb.6.1433277505452; Tue, 02 Jun 2015 13:38:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Alexs-MacBook-Air-2.local (c-69-249-31-89.hsd1.pa.comcast.net. [69.249.31.89]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ew5sm28880713vdc.10.2015.06.02.13.38.23 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 02 Jun 2015 13:38:24 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2015 16:38:26 -0400 From: Alex Burka To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: Re: [bpfk] Grammar of letterals and numerals in {li} X-Mailer: Airmail Beta (308) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="556e1442_727c9906_8eb0" X-Original-Sender: durka42@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of durka42@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400c:c0f::235 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=durka42@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 972099695765 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: -3.0 (---) X-Spam_score: -3.0 X-Spam_score_int: -29 X-Spam_bar: --- Content-Length: 6580 --556e1442_727c9906_8eb0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Ah, I didn't realize that "mex" was separate from "number+lerfu string". So= I guess this is entirely orthogonal to la zipcpi's detri1 proposal, even t= hough that thread got hijacked, .u'i. On June 2, 2015 at 4:23:45 PM, Jorge Llamb=C3=ADas (jjllambias@gmail.com) w= rote: On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 11:47 AM, Alex Burka wrote: Agreed, the biggest question for me (beyond whether this is a good idea at = all, zo'o zo'o nai) is what changes would be made to the grammar of LI? None. It only affects "number" and "lerfu-string" directly. li-clause remai= ns the same: li-clause <- LI-clause free* mex LOhO-clause? free* =20 Would it be able to take a pure-lerfu string, a pure-digit string, but not = a mixture? Among other things, yes. It still takes any mex. =C2=A0 Or would we leave LI alone but create two new gadri selma'o that take pure-= lerfu and pure-digit, respectively? We leave LI alone and we don't create anything new. mu'o mi'e xorxes -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= BPFK" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= BPFK" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --556e1442_727c9906_8eb0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline =
Ah, I didn't realize that "mex" was separate from = "number+lerfu string". So I guess this is entirely orthogonal to la zipcpi'= s detri1 proposal, even though that thread got hijacked, .u'i.

<= div id=3D"bloop_sign_1433277435266569216" class=3D"bloop_sign">
<= p class=3D"airmail_on" style=3D"color:#000;">On June 2, 2015 at 4:23:45 PM,= Jorge Llamb=C3=ADas (jjllambias@gm= ail.com) wrote:

=


On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 11:47 AM, Alex Burka <durka42@gmail.com> wrote:
Agreed, the biggest question for me (beyond whether this is a good idea at all, zo'o zo'o nai) is what changes would be made to the grammar of LI?

None. It only affects "number" and "lerfu-string" directly. li-clause remains the same:
l=
i-clause <- LI-clause free* mex LOhO-clause? free* 
Would it be able to take a pure-lerfu string, a pure-digit string, but not a mixture?

Among other things, yes. It still takes any mex.
 
Or would we leave LI alone but create two new gadri selma'o that take pure-lerfu and pure-digit, respectively?

We leave LI alone and we don't create anything new.

mu'o mi'e xorxes
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to = bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at ht= tp://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to bpfk-list= +unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at ht= tp://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--556e1442_727c9906_8eb0--