Received: from mail-la0-f58.google.com ([209.85.215.58]:33314) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1.2:AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1Yzt2Z-0004Ow-Jp; Tue, 02 Jun 2015 13:44:08 -0700 Received: by lamq1 with SMTP id q1sf52994142lam.0; Tue, 02 Jun 2015 13:43:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help :list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=E1u9TYvE+vkPtf+/fgFKAaxDrYYglFjGoBpEtJN6z4s=; b=WCa2JBy07X+P80OzpnQFvWkZTMw5web5MD7M4BDEBXdsMarXgIjNIghkK7H19GWLsn CK25moq3VSjhwT0zZJZ2P/1tN39tgunyUyM4UEdqTuRXUxi6tu4QoiMkdVLJGg/NmxFB L3U+4hH6x4c51ujPP/1Qdmi4MooIISib59cwglw0gYCmzWKNBSx/t4sn+yjiDiNTR+Um tmM5keOabId73S1EVicAcd5MPOo8oQ1ZyIuwdRdrJjY1ZGtkItpMo+egUgo4RWQ/RlNr oBBk3M5JIkyjPyB4OUfDY3+eEBEzJE0Xbr/0gwD0+l9qQrBbrcCpbjH5shCX9BAQnnAo kVvw== X-Received: by 10.180.97.7 with SMTP id dw7mr125683wib.1.1433277836012; Tue, 02 Jun 2015 13:43:56 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.180.87.167 with SMTP id az7ls1003353wib.5.canary; Tue, 02 Jun 2015 13:43:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.194.158.134 with SMTP id wu6mr5346511wjb.6.1433277835722; Tue, 02 Jun 2015 13:43:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wi0-x22f.google.com (mail-wi0-x22f.google.com. [2a00:1450:400c:c05::22f]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p12si733316wiv.1.2015.06.02.13.43.55 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 02 Jun 2015 13:43:55 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c05::22f as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:400c:c05::22f; Received: by mail-wi0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id o1so159484143wiz.1 for ; Tue, 02 Jun 2015 13:43:55 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.103.2 with SMTP id fs2mr54797859wjb.151.1433277835664; Tue, 02 Jun 2015 13:43:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.27.26.17 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 13:43:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2015 17:43:55 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [bpfk] Grammar of letterals and numerals in {li} From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jorge_Llamb=C3=ADas?= To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e010d84a842645805178f0065 X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c05::22f as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 972099695765 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_bar: - Content-Length: 2990 --089e010d84a842645805178f0065 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 5:38 PM, Alex Burka wrote: > Ah, I didn't realize that "mex" was separate from "number+lerfu string". > So I guess this is entirely orthogonal to la zipcpi's detri1 proposal, even > though that thread got hijacked, .u'i. > The proposal to separate of digits and lerfu in strings is not orthogonal to the detri proposal, because the the detri proposal uses numbers that contain lerfu. But both proposals are (relatively) orthogonal to MEX, which is what "li" takes as an argument. mu'o mi'e xorxes -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --089e010d84a842645805178f0065 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 5:38 PM, Alex Burka <durka42@gmail.com><= /span> wrote:
Ah, I didn't realize that &qu= ot;mex" was separate from "number+lerfu string". So I guess = this is entirely orthogonal to la zipcpi's detri1 proposal, even though= that thread got hijacked, .u'i.

The proposal to separate of digits and lerfu in strings is not orthog= onal to the detri proposal, because the the detri proposal uses numbers tha= t contain lerfu. But both proposals are (relatively) orthogonal to MEX, whi= ch is what "li" takes as an argument.=C2=A0

<= div>mu'o mi'e xorxes

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to bpfk-list= +unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at ht= tp://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--089e010d84a842645805178f0065--