Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 69.168.97.48 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of phma@bezitopo.org) client-ip=69.168.97.48;
X_CMAE_Category: 0,0 Undefined,Undefined
X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=ZujUdbLG c=1 sm=0 tr=0 a=8WxDmEN+yG9ijBF2nxzWZQ==:117 a=8WxDmEN+yG9ijBF2nxzWZQ==:17 a=K-v-2zaBAAAA:8 a=JNFw9bs7AAAA:8 a=ANSa77Uay4QA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=zOBTXjUuO1YA:10 a=2WxL0rlCbehnPRYPT_QA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10
X-CM-Score: 0
X-Scanned-by: Cloudmark Authority Engine
Received-SPF: neutral (smtp02.hughes.cmh.synacor.com: 45.37.90.97 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of bezitopo.org)
Received: from [45.37.90.97] ([45.37.90.97:43614] helo=bezitopo.org)
	by smtp.hughes.net (envelope-from <phma@bezitopo.org>)
	(ecelerity 2.2.3.49 r(42060/42061)) with ESMTPSA (cipher=AES256-SHA) 
	id F9/0F-08210-9A75B955; Tue, 07 Jul 2015 00:38:01 -0400
Received: from caracal.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by bezitopo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09A5824F8
	for <bpfk-list@googlegroups.com>; Tue,  7 Jul 2015 00:37:59 -0400 (EDT)
From: Pierre Abbat <phma@bezitopo.org>
To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: [bpfk] Alternatives to {bo} in {i ... bo}?
Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2015 00:37:38 -0400
Message-ID: <2619578.SDvdWZmG6y@caracal>
User-Agent: KMail/4.13.3 (Linux/3.13.0-53-generic; KDE/4.13.3; x86_64; ; )
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Original-Sender: phma@bezitopo.org
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com;       spf=neutral
 (google.com: 69.168.97.48 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess
 record for domain of phma@bezitopo.org) smtp.mail=phma@bezitopo.org
Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <bpfk-list.googlegroups.com>
X-Spam-Checked-In-Group: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
X-Google-Group-Id: 972099695765
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/post>, <mailto:bpfk-list@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/>, <mailto:bpfk-list+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list
Sender: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/subscribe>, <mailto:bpfk-list+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:googlegroups-manage+972099695765+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>,
 <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/subscribe>
X-Spam-Score: -3.0 (---)
X-Spam_score: -3.0
X-Spam_score_int: -29
X-Spam_bar: ---
Content-Length: 1035

Two bridi can be connected by {i SUMTCITA bo}. {bo} has two effects: it 
prevents an immediately following sumti from being taken as the object of the 
preposition, and it groups the bridi more tightly and right-associatively than 
surrounding bridi connected by just {i}. One may want left-association:

lo filso cu lacpu lo mamta bakni lo carce .icabo lo cifybakni cu pinfu 
.itezu'ebo facki lo jei la .iaves. kau gasnu lo nunbilma

(This is an abbreviated version of 1 Samuel 6:7-9.) Is there a way to connect 
three or more bridi with prepositions without forcing right association?

Pierre
-- 
li fi'u vu'u fi'u fi'u du li pa

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.