Return-path: Envelope-to: jbovlaste-admin@lojban.org Delivery-date: Mon, 02 Jun 2025 11:13:48 -0700 Received: from [192.168.123.254] (port=34364 helo=web.lojban.org) by fe3e2dc928fd with smtp (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1uM9fN-003m8m-1k for jbovlaste-admin@lojban.org; Mon, 02 Jun 2025 11:13:48 -0700 Received: by web.lojban.org (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 02 Jun 2025 18:13:45 +0000 From: "Apache" To: ByronJohnsonFP@gmail.com Reply-To: webmaster@lojban.org Subject: [jvsw] Definition Edited At Word i'oi'a'o -- By bairyn Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2025 18:13:45 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Message-Id: X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / In jbovlaste, the user bairyn has edited a definition of "i'oi'a'o" in the language "English". Differences: 5,5c5,9 < This is a generalization of {i'oi}, except {i'oi'a'o} takes the word afterwards for attachment (nothing is added if the cmavo is already explicitly terminated before the next occurance of the word); «.i'oi» ＝＝ «.i'oi'a'o .i». {zo}-like quotation. Etymology: {i'oi} and {va'o}. Note: {i'oi'a'o} takes a word afterwards and does not itself support more advanced terminator attachments. Note: if this word ever finds much use, perhaps a shorter contraction can be considered, like «i'oi'a», defined as a contraction of {i'oi'a'o}. Note: unlike for {lu}..{li'u}, if inside {lo'u}…{le'u}, this word doesn't have an effect from the outside perspective, since the contents of {lo'u} quotes are isolated from the grammar outside except for the terminator {le'u}; thus {i'oi} and {i'oi'a'o} don't work for {lo'u} to auto-add a missing {le'u} on the next {i}, although it's possible to override features of the language such as this with {baunpli} declarations. --- > This is a generalization of {i'oi}, except {i'oi'a'o} takes the word afterwards for attachment (nothing is added if the cmavo is already explicitly terminated before the next occurance of the word); «.i'oi» ＝＝ «.i'oi'a'o .i». {zo}-like quotation. Etymology: {i'oi} and {va'o}. Note: {i'oi'a'o} takes a word afterwards and does not itself support more advanced terminator attachments. Note: unlike for {lu}..{li'u}, if inside {lo'u}…{le'u}, this word doesn't have an effect from the outside perspective, since the contents of {lo'u} quotes are isolated from the grammar outside except for the terminator {le'u}; thus {i'oi} and {i'oi'a'o} don't work for {lo'u} to auto-add a missing {le'u} on the next {i}, although it's possible to override features of the language such as this with {baunpli} declarations. > > ni'o Elided terminators: {i'oi'a'o} attaches to the next word, even if the next word occurence is implied as an elided terminator; it does not only attach to explicitly present word occurences. > > ni'o When the word is actually the same as the terminator: Rather than being a no-op, in this case it adds another duplicated terminator. {i'oi'a} is a variant of {i'oi'a'o} specialized to this case; see {i'oi'a} for more information and to see how this can be useful. (e.g. «fu'e i'oi'a» ＝＝ «fu'e i'oi'a'o fu'o», and «noi i'oi'a» ＝＝ «noi i'oi'a'o ku'o».) Old Data: Definition: require preceding cmavo is terminated before the next occurence of the word following; attach an omitted terminator to next … Notes: This is a generalization of {i'oi}, except {i'oi'a'o} takes the word afterwards for attachment (nothing is added if the cmavo is already explicitly terminated before the next occurance of the word); «.i'oi» ＝＝ «.i'oi'a'o .i». {zo}-like quotation. Etymology: {i'oi} and {va'o}. Note: {i'oi'a'o} takes a word afterwards and does not itself support more advanced terminator attachments. Note: if this word ever finds much use, perhaps a shorter contraction can be considered, like «i'oi'a», defined as a contraction of {i'oi'a'o}. Note: unlike for {lu}..{li'u}, if inside {lo'u}…{le'u}, this word doesn't have an effect from the outside perspective, since the contents of {lo'u} quotes are isolated from the grammar outside except for the terminator {le'u}; thus {i'oi} and {i'oi'a'o} don't work for {lo'u} to auto-add a missing {le'u} on the next {i}, although it's possible to override features of the language such as this with {baunpli} declarations. Jargon: Gloss Keywords: Place Keywords: New Data: Definition: require preceding cmavo is terminated before the next occurence of the word following; attach an omitted terminator to next … Notes: This is a generalization of {i'oi}, except {i'oi'a'o} takes the word afterwards for attachment (nothing is added if the cmavo is already explicitly terminated before the next occurance of the word); «.i'oi» ＝＝ «.i'oi'a'o .i». {zo}-like quotation. Etymology: {i'oi} and {va'o}. Note: {i'oi'a'o} takes a word afterwards and does not itself support more advanced terminator attachments. Note: unlike for {lu}..{li'u}, if inside {lo'u}…{le'u}, this word doesn't have an effect from the outside perspective, since the contents of {lo'u} quotes are isolated from the grammar outside except for the terminator {le'u}; thus {i'oi} and {i'oi'a'o} don't work for {lo'u} to auto-add a missing {le'u} on the next {i}, although it's possible to override features of the language such as this with {baunpli} declarations. ni'o Elided terminators: {i'oi'a'o} attaches to the next word, even if the next word occurence is implied as an elided terminator; it does not only attach to explicitly present word occurences. ni'o When the word is actually the same as the terminator: Rather than being a no-op, in this case it adds another duplicated terminator. {i'oi'a} is a variant of {i'oi'a'o} specialized to this case; see {i'oi'a} for more information and to see how this can be useful. (e.g. «fu'e i'oi'a» ＝＝ «fu'e i'oi'a'o fu'o», and «noi i'oi'a» ＝＝ «noi i'oi'a'o ku'o».) Jargon: Gloss Keywords: Place Keywords: You can go to to see it.