Received: from mail-qw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.216.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QTQKt-0004jv-AM for lbck-archive@lojban.org; Sun, 05 Jun 2011 20:18:41 -0700 Received: by qwh5 with SMTP id 5sf4800856qwh.16 for ; Sun, 05 Jun 2011 20:18:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:x-beenthere:received-spf:x-authority-analysis :x-cloudmark-score:x-originating-ip:from:to:subject:date:user-agent :references:in-reply-to:mime-version:message-id:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition; bh=DtoCWmLJ5bRX3L1vbIFVO0aO1RmX/tDBWORRj1rQ5DI=; b=ddKrqk2XoVPfW3AvIqRnM694sIJuYcLt/1YZyooSvHNDfutjfShogIPrU03ykYnC6j kbRWiVrSfmVoK3FOOVnMWxU2y8QExvFX1zUgxLlYDNGPgeLse+Q0gFxVKap/QnBCyzw2 cNCP28gN9MrYOyy8OYxWP8PTSsYO4UA1ClRN0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:x-authority-analysis:x-cloudmark-score :x-originating-ip:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references :in-reply-to:mime-version:message-id:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition; b=NVTYaEWesHn3rhZ4PWFOg4Im2c/RIplqHWyOtBe7bKtiM5CKQ/hSSK8P6vDZajnVyH nNFhy1yO7RNZAtGq3z9VpR48YU095ho1UCMtLRFiGOgYtotg22TH31P2UEJq2+yJJ9Gy EbOc/Wn8L7Wh6smFhOd+ITVVE8DH0NXmv/icA= Received: by 10.224.42.66 with SMTP id r2mr242641qae.36.1307330313570; Sun, 05 Jun 2011 20:18:33 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban-lbck@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.224.138.148 with SMTP id a20ls868565qau.5.gmail; Sun, 05 Jun 2011 20:18:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.211.201 with SMTP id gp9mr798951qab.2.1307330313335; Sun, 05 Jun 2011 20:18:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.211.201 with SMTP id gp9mr798950qab.2.1307330313324; Sun, 05 Jun 2011 20:18:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com (cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com [75.180.132.122]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id k32si3927035qcs.1.2011.06.05.20.18.31; Sun, 05 Jun 2011 20:18:31 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 75.180.132.122 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of phma@phma.optus.nu) client-ip=75.180.132.122; X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=aeMH4JcVOnVr0LmJAzqEvfnmJyuaZufWdlng4HTRGCk= c=1 sm=0 a=6ti_TD8eFm8A:10 a=wPDyFdB5xvgA:10 a=Q9fys5e9bTEA:10 a=9o99xeNKNPYSmM5t9x5+TQ==:17 a=DgODRUopZ-CKiCSvA0oA:9 a=PUjeQqilurYA:10 a=9o99xeNKNPYSmM5t9x5+TQ==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 75.176.118.168 Received: from [75.176.118.168] ([75.176.118.168:44635] helo=chausie) by cdptpa-oedge02.mail.rr.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.46 r()) with ESMTP id 19/F5-03893-6074CED4; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 03:18:30 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chausie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F21C156CF for ; Sun, 5 Jun 2011 23:18:30 -0400 (EDT) From: Pierre Abbat To: lojban-lbck@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: some questions Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2011 23:18:26 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 0.20070907.709405) References: <201106051950.22790.phma@phma.optus.nu> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <201106052318.27859.phma@phma.optus.nu> X-Original-Sender: phma@phma.optus.nu X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 75.180.132.122 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of phma@phma.optus.nu) smtp.mail=phma@phma.optus.nu Reply-To: lojban-lbck@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-lbck@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-lbck+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 186919887485 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-lbck@googlegroups.com List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Content-Length: 557 On Sunday 05 June 2011 22:54:18 .arpis. wrote: > Grammar question. I can't guess whether or not it would be easier for > someone Japanese, but I eliminated 3 of the 5 choices by the fact that they > clearly don't fit, and looked up bo'u to check that it wasn't some > important cmavo I didn't know. Would it be fair to include a cmavo, such as "be", which produces a grammatical, but nonsensical, sentence? Can you come up with some questions for the rest of us to try? Pierre -- I believe in Yellow when I'm in Sweden and in Black when I'm in Wales.