Received: from mail-vx0-f189.google.com ([209.85.220.189]:41530) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RFqr2-0005O7-2b for lbck-archive@lojban.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 10:20:04 -0700 Received: by vcbfo14 with SMTP id fo14sf2174967vcb.16 for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 10:19:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:x-authority-analysis:x-cloudmark-score :x-originating-ip:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references :in-reply-to:mime-version:message-id:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition; bh=hnLzBwPj/vP0RjFNd0LTBzp9n091tOphsCs3m09FW5M=; b=Z/tLzX88Ktd2VPnCj9RU9KeKZ6IapFsKhqP+HRaXg1yYkX/6Osdz4U9mVjGlNLbbuI V/JYQa26cpcxNddFlGf83HRWhOHmniE/730OttbxKOBWBM4Xaf1/ndC9LANa1OcfNAXb DbLb6OpJANczjlrchv31D6vwpaSRer6RWPC1M= Received: by 10.220.201.74 with SMTP id ez10mr1563080vcb.14.1318871993607; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 10:19:53 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban-lbck@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.52.24.163 with SMTP id v3ls9350920vdf.3.gmail; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 10:19:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.240.204 with SMTP id wc12mr14661845vdc.2.1318871993219; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 10:19:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.240.204 with SMTP id wc12mr14661843vdc.2.1318871993212; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 10:19:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com (cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com. [75.180.132.123]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id i18si7050702vde.1.2011.10.17.10.19.52; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 10:19:52 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 75.180.132.123 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of phma@phma.optus.nu) client-ip=75.180.132.123; X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=Ri5u3PlAq/1Uv+Mf6lrMSBCtIb5BqfMjuDuUC3EjppU= c=1 sm=0 a=6ti_TD8eFm8A:10 a=wPDyFdB5xvgA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=9o99xeNKNPYSmM5t9x5+TQ==:17 a=GWPaOObIrBWDnRZqtN8A:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=9o99xeNKNPYSmM5t9x5+TQ==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 75.176.118.168 Received: from [75.176.118.168] ([75.176.118.168:52939] helo=chausie) by cdptpa-oedge04.mail.rr.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.46 r()) with ESMTP id C7/5D-26592-8B36C9E4; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 17:19:52 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chausie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A333216A1 for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 13:19:51 -0400 (EDT) From: Pierre Abbat To: lojban-lbck@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: rating scales Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 13:19:08 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 0.20070907.709405) References: <201106122219.25705.phma@phma.optus.nu> In-Reply-To: <201106122219.25705.phma@phma.optus.nu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <201110171319.16802.phma@phma.optus.nu> X-Original-Sender: phma@phma.optus.nu X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 75.180.132.123 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of phma@phma.optus.nu) smtp.mail=phma@phma.optus.nu Reply-To: lojban-lbck@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-lbck@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-lbck+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 186919887485 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-lbck@googlegroups.com List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.1 X-Spam_score_int: 1 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Here's a suggestion for a cmavo scale: 0: LE, CU, LA, COI, DOI, PA, BU, BY, KOhA, I, UI, GOI, DOhU, GOhA, NA, PU, Y 1: A, BAI, BAhE, BE, BEI, BEhO, CAhA, FA, SE, CAI, GEhU, NU, KEI, LAhE, MOI, NAI, ROI, SI, VA, ZI, LUhU 2: GA, GI, GIhA, GUhA, JA, JOI, BIhI, KE, KEhE, NOI, KUhO, LU, LIhU, LI, ME, NAhE, TAhE, VAU, VEhA, ZEhA, VIhA, ZIhA, ZAhO, FAhA, ZO, BO, BOI, CO 3: JAI, GAhO, LOhU, LEhU, NIhO, RAhO, TO, TOI, ZEI, ZOhU, CUhE, KI, FEhE, DAhO, LOhO, MEhU, MOhI 4: MAI, SA, SU, SEI, SOI, SEhU, TUhE, TUhU, CEI, FIhO, FEhU, FUhE, FUhO, VUhU, VUhO, XI, ZIhE 5: BIhE, CEhE, TEI, FOI, FUhA, KUhE, LAU, MAhO, MOhE, NAhU, NIhE, NUhA, NUhI, NUhU, PEhO, PEhE, TEhU, VEI, VEhO [...] Content analysis details: (0.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.85.220.189 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 0.8 UPPERCASE_50_75 message body is 50-75% uppercase Content-Length: 913 Here's a suggestion for a cmavo scale: 0: LE, CU, LA, COI, DOI, PA, BU, BY, KOhA, I, UI, GOI, DOhU, GOhA, NA, PU, Y 1: A, BAI, BAhE, BE, BEI, BEhO, CAhA, FA, SE, CAI, GEhU, NU, KEI, LAhE, MOI, NAI, ROI, SI, VA, ZI, LUhU 2: GA, GI, GIhA, GUhA, JA, JOI, BIhI, KE, KEhE, NOI, KUhO, LU, LIhU, LI, ME, NAhE, TAhE, VAU, VEhA, ZEhA, VIhA, ZIhA, ZAhO, FAhA, ZO, BO, BOI, CO 3: JAI, GAhO, LOhU, LEhU, NIhO, RAhO, TO, TOI, ZEI, ZOhU, CUhE, KI, FEhE, DAhO, LOhO, MEhU, MOhI 4: MAI, SA, SU, SEI, SOI, SEhU, TUhE, TUhU, CEI, FIhO, FEhU, FUhE, FUhO, VUhU, VUhO, XI, ZIhE 5: BIhE, CEhE, TEI, FOI, FUhA, KUhE, LAU, MAhO, MOhE, NAhU, NIhE, NUhA, NUhI, NUhU, PEhO, PEhE, TEhU, VEI, VEhO To apply the scale to a question, find the highest number corresponding to a selma'o of a cmavo in the question and answers (and accompanying text, if it's a reading comprehension question). Pierre -- li fi'u vu'u fi'u fi'u du li pa