Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Thu, 25 Feb 2010 17:35:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Nkp6Z-0003sw-Uc for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 17:35:00 -0800 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.153]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Nkp6V-0003sK-BI for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 17:34:59 -0800 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 19so322698fgg.10 for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 17:34:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=AWkAooTHpQ0hE36OqzxrYALrGBNdj7TX3ikd6TM4LTI=; b=u1e4jJh9OIszY+Ca5+1zByoJVVGC/u9IS+z4NxiuFB2HXjcqtWGGxnm20+I4v40pKN BPY2tj1IfMUX0QZ8KLehEe+GohyvtLe793zYp+6KDlongKptr5F88zuOKhB0o+qnmv2J CoRMCvZPxD0X5ybIXZgbByteZaqc//pF8sUl4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=wEJDb8FzNGKxezgEcnW2KHLSS0QTliRn9F7WEEprKUxMPoaVtaSZlYYlQui6CvDWzC RPQCS5TbTUj880BcrYiEO51WKd26h24IdeTdpOGCatT1eLa1ne3B0+JEW4fwS4/I5cYu KPZKH28sSukUk9Tx9TW70WEalQfXxg1g8g3Bk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.87.55.15 with SMTP id h15mr952193fgk.31.1267148093663; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 17:34:53 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <925d17561002251427h15040eb6p7256255a4d770b3c@mail.gmail.com> References: <1f1080831002250758rb17bd2dk664e035452c298e4@mail.gmail.com> <925d17561002250954p6d57ef87w3cde7fd92a9fe7d9@mail.gmail.com> <1f1080831002251318p78bab1dbha716f66a082c0daf@mail.gmail.com> <5715b9301002251328o11d2223r12bf275e35e71955@mail.gmail.com> <925d17561002251336o12bddef4re5cec4b5ac32893f@mail.gmail.com> <20100225215933.GA14097@sdf.lonestar.org> <925d17561002251427h15040eb6p7256255a4d770b3c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 20:34:53 -0500 Message-ID: <1a3d02c41002251734h18fc88e0ue9d3aec6734b0538@mail.gmail.com> Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: Tenses in abstractions From: Sam Chapin To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis X-archive-position: 2915 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: not.here.now@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners Content-Length: 1201 Minimiscience's view is the one described in chapter 10 of the online draft reference grammar. Is this other reimagining of ZI and VA widely used? It breaks the { broda} == { ku broda} identity that holds for everything else. Don't termsets solve the problem of asking for a magnitude? e.g. {PU/FAhA nu'i da lu'a ma nu'u} N.B.: Before looking it up, I would have guessed you could ask {PU/FAhA cu'e broda} and hope for a response from ZI/VI, but the refgram says that ("The only way to combine {cu'e} with other tense cmavo is through logical connection"). Why? What would it break to allow cu'e in a compound tense? 2010/2/25 Jorge Llambías : > On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 6:59 PM, Minimiscience wrote: >> >> Really?  I thought "{zi ma}" meant "a short time from what?" by analogy to "{vi >> ma}." > > There are two different views on that. I prefer to use ZI/VA to tag > the magnitude of displacement from the origin (they are after all > magnitude of displacement tags.) The other view is to use them to tag > the origin, like PU/FAhA. But then you have no easy way of tagging the > magnitude of displacement. > > mu'o mi'e xorxes > > > >