Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Wed, 12 Feb 2003 13:45:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from rlpowell by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12) id 18j4gt-0004vz-00 for lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org; Wed, 12 Feb 2003 13:45:15 -0800 Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 13:45:15 -0800 To: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: A problem with cu Message-ID: <20030212214515.GW30757@digitalkingdom.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i From: Robin Lee Powell X-archive-position: 102 X-Approved-By: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-list: lojban-beginners Content-Length: 866 On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 01:31:59PM +0100, lojban@65536.org wrote: > coi rodo > > Thanks for your answers. If I would recognize {nu mi cilre fi > la lojban.} in {lenu mi cilre fi la lojban. cu xamgu mi} as a > selbri the {cu} in this sentence would be clear. Let's see what > I understand with my little knowledge about Lojban. If I don't > use {cu} {xamgu} would be x5 of {cilre}. No. You would have a tanru consisting of the pieces "nu mi cilre fi la lojban." and "xamgu". Literally, "event of I learn lojban type-of goodness". mi then fills the x2 of that tanru; i.e. the x2 of xamgu. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. .i le pamoi velru'e zo'u crepu le plibu taxfu .i le remoi velru'e zo'u mo .i le cimoi velru'e zo'u ba'e prali .uisai http://www.lojban.org/ *** to sa'a cu'u lei pibyta'u cridrnoma toi