Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Wed, 19 Feb 2003 07:31:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from postman.arcor-online.net ([151.189.0.87]) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 18lWBk-00016v-00 for lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org; Wed, 19 Feb 2003 07:31:12 -0800 Received: from hamwpne1 (pc1-oxfd1-5-cust27.oxfd.cable.ntl.com [62.254.134.27]) (authenticated bits=0) by postman.arcor-online.net (8.12.4/8.12.4) with ESMTP id h1JFV7Jl053815 for ; Wed, 19 Feb 2003 16:31:09 +0100 (CET) From: "Philip Newton" Organization: datenrevision GmbH & Co. OHG To: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 16:29:44 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: Some translations Message-ID: <3E53B0F8.3326.1B6E60B@localhost> Priority: normal In-reply-to: <000f01c2d828$c0fd1c60$a80210ac@catie.ac.cr> Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: Quoted-printable Content-description: Mail message body X-archive-position: 143 X-Approved-By: pnewton@gmx.de X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-original-sender: pnewton@gmx.de Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-list: lojban-beginners Content-Length: 1844 On 19 Feb 2003 at 9:08, =C1lvaro Vallejo wrote: > mi nitcu cu fanva ti glivla la lojban > (I need to translate into Lojban the following words, is the utterance i= n > Lojban right?) Slow down, cowboy! I wonder why you "need" so many words right now -- wouldn't basic grammar be better first? No offense. FWIW, I'd probably say something more like {mi nitcu lenu fanva le vi glivla la lojban}. I also tried something like {mi nitcu lenu fanva ti noi glivla la lojban}, but that treats {la lojban} as x2 of {glivla}. And if I add {ge'u}, which I think ought to end the relative phrase {ti noi glivla}, jbofi'e doesn't like the sentence any more. Hang on... *looks through ma'oste again* ku'o? Ah, that seems to work. {mi nitcu lenu fanva ti noi glivla ku'o la lojban}, then. (What's the difference between a "relative phrase" (terminated by {ge'u}) and a "relative clause" (terminated by {ku'o}), then?) I think most of the words below will surely be fu'ivla; certainly, I believe most of the animals will be. http://www.lojban.org/wiki/index.php/danlu%20baljutsi may be interesting. > calf bakni verba? > igloo {iglu} has been proposed. Maybe {dinjrxiglu} if you want a fu'ivla? > lamb - lanme? {lanme} is any sheep, so yes. Maybe {lanme verba} for more precision, or {lanme cifnu} for a very young one? > piano - pipno? .ie > shears jinci > sheep - lanme? (see lamb) .ie > shovel canpa > sledge hammer something with {mruli}, presumably. > trombone > trumpet These are both kinds of {tabra}. > violin A kind of {jgita}. {jgitrvioline}, perhaps? > x-acto dakfrxeksakto ? mu'o mi'e filip. -- filip.niutyn. All opinions are my own, not my employer's. If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.