Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Wed, 19 Feb 2003 07:51:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from [66.111.194.10] (helo=granite.thestonecutters.net) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 18lWVH-0002WL-00 for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Wed, 19 Feb 2003 07:51:24 -0800 Received: from localhost (xod@localhost) by granite.thestonecutters.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h1JFpJ238111 for ; Wed, 19 Feb 2003 10:51:19 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from xod@thestonecutters.net) Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 10:51:19 -0500 (EST) From: Invent Yourself To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: ti, ta, tu for people? In-Reply-To: <1045655098.3e536e3a38274@imp.free.fr> Message-ID: <20030219104836.C38036-100000@granite.thestonecutters.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-archive-position: 144 X-Approved-By: xod@thestonecutters.net X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-original-sender: xod@thestonecutters.net Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-list: lojban-beginners Content-Length: 452 On Wed, 19 Feb 2003, jexOm. wrote: > So, to me Philip's question is understandable, since a person is not an > "object". I believe in this usage the term "object" should be expanded to "physical object", as opposed to "inanimate object". Since people's bodies are physical objects, the ti-series is appropriate. -- Seventy-two city councils, including Philadelphia, Austin, Chicago, Baltimore and Cleveland have passed anti-war resolutions.