Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Mon, 05 May 2003 15:19:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com ([66.68.125.184] ident=root) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19CoJL-0002YY-00 for lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org; Mon, 05 May 2003 15:19:51 -0700 Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (smmsp@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.8p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h45MTk67070897 for ; Mon, 5 May 2003 17:29:46 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from fracture@cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com) Received: (from fracture@localhost) by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.8p1/8.12.8/Submit) id h45L7Ro5069901 for lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org; Mon, 5 May 2003 16:07:27 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 5 May 2003 16:07:27 -0500 From: Jordan DeLong To: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: coi lojban. Message-ID: <20030505210727.GA69841@allusion.net> References: <200305020753.h427rs624168@mail.cjb.net> <20030502165610.GG6079@digitalkingdom.org> <20030505175322.GA1309@panda.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="GvXjxJ+pjyke8COw" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030505175322.GA1309@panda.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-archive-position: 299 X-Approved-By: fracture@allusion.net X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-original-sender: fracture@allusion.net Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-list: lojban-beginners Content-Length: 1818 --GvXjxJ+pjyke8COw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, May 06, 2003 at 01:53:22AM +0800, tk1@despammed.com wrote: > Hello, >=20 > > The word formation rules are about the only *syntactic* rules Lojban > > has. > > http://www.lojban.org/publications/reference_grammar/chapter4.html >=20 > Thanks. >=20 > I am currently flipping through the reference grammar, and I just got > another question: in Chapter 6 this example is given: >=20 > 13.3) ro da poi prenu cu prami pa de poi finpe > All somethings-1 which-are persons love one something-2 > which-is a-fish. > All persons love a fish (each his/her own). >=20 > (This is not the same as "All persons love a certain fish"; the > difference between the two is one of quantifier order.) >=20 > If I change the above Lojban sentence to {pa de poi finpe cu se prami ro = da > poi prenu}, will the new sentence take on the first or second meaning? In > other words, can the use of the word {se} potentially _change_ the meaning > of a sentence, in addition to switching sumti order? It takes the "There is a certain fish that all persons love" meaning. The change in meaning is because you changed the order of the terms. You don't need se to do that. For example {fe pa finpe cu prami fa ro prenu}. --=20 Jordan DeLong - fracture@allusion.net lu zo'o loi censa bakni cu terzba le zaltapla poi xagrai li'u sei la mark. tuen. cusku --GvXjxJ+pjyke8COw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+ttKPDrrilS51AZ8RAjiEAJ4yOZuf4ihJDHNO/NVEwNxuyTc85QCguN3j u+whgbHH9sypvwXczBdAWbg= =kzFS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --GvXjxJ+pjyke8COw--