Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Sat, 13 Mar 2004 08:57:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from [216.127.72.21] (helo=www.simlifecycle.com) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1B2CSN-0001fM-0z for lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2004 08:57:51 -0800 Received: from localhost (melissa@localhost) by www.simlifecycle.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i2DGBpp06906 for ; Sat, 13 Mar 2004 10:11:51 -0600 Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 10:11:51 -0600 (CST) From: melissa@fastanimals.com X-X-Sender: melissa@www.simlifecycle.com To: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: Story time In-Reply-To: <20040313152634.GA67210@allusion.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-archive-position: 604 X-Approved-By: melissa@fastanimals.com X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-original-sender: melissa@fastanimals.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-list: lojban-beginners Content-Length: 668 On Sat, 13 Mar 2004, Jordan DeLong wrote: > `po' is like "inseperably associated with". Example {le birka po > me}. Wait a sec. The Beginner's Guide says that pe is an association, po is a unique association, and po'e is an inalienable association. le birka po'e mi Is this not right? I suppose po would also make sense, since I am the only one having this particular arm. Unless someone cuts it off and begins using it as a club, in which case it would also be "his arm" in the same sense as "his sword." But even then it's still inalienably *my* arm, which I understood to be the point of po'e rather than po. -- mylisys XOLynswyrt mi tadni la lojban