Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Thu, 04 Nov 2004 15:14:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from web41902.mail.yahoo.com ([66.218.93.153]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CPqo5-0001iO-RW for lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org; Thu, 04 Nov 2004 15:14:17 -0800 Received: (qmail 40201 invoked by uid 60001); 4 Nov 2004 23:13:44 -0000 Message-ID: <20041104231344.40199.qmail@web41902.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [200.43.213.161] by web41902.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 04 Nov 2004 15:13:44 PST Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2004 15:13:44 -0800 (PST) From: Jorge "Llambías" Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: Question around beginner's chapter 4 To: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org In-Reply-To: <20041104223016.GF25376@chain.digitalkingdom.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-archive-position: 861 X-Approved-By: jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-original-sender: jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-list: lojban-beginners Content-Length: 1979 --- Robin Lee Powell wrote: > On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 01:40:43PM -0800, Jorge Llamb?as wrote: > > The other combinations are also not much used, but possible. {lo > > ci le gerku} is three of the dogs, but not necessarily three > > specific ones that I have in mind. > > > > {lo ci lo gerku} is just three dogs. Indistinguishable from {lo ci > > gerku} if we don't require the inner quantifier to be all the dogs > > that there are in the world. > > > > {le ci lo gerku} is the three dogs I have in mind. > > Indistinguishable, from {le ci gerku} as far as I can tell. > > *CAREFUL*! > > xorlo isn't final yet, you know! I tried to be careful because of that, that's why I said "if", but you're right, I forgot about the outer su'o. In CLL {lo ci lo gerku} is {su'o lo ci lo gerku}. > To the original poster: the interpretation based above is > provisional; we are still working out the details. The strict CLL > interpretation is: > > lo ci le gerku == Any of the three things that really are things > that may or may not be dogs and that you have in mind. Note that > this says that there are *only* three such things in the universe > (which in this case isn't *too* bad). Not "any of the three" but "at least one of the three": it may be one, two or the three of them that are white. In CLL {lo} does not refer, it just quantifies. > lo ci lo gerku == Any of the three things that really are dogs; > there are only three. As xorxes says, equivalent to lo ci gerku. In CLL, not equivalent. It's "at least one of some three out of all that there are". The intermediate {ci} is almost vacuous here, except that it implies that there must be least three dogs in existance. If at least one out of all dogs is white, and there are at least three dogs, then there will be some three such that at least one of those three is white. mu'o mi'e xorxes __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Check out the new Yahoo! Front Page. www.yahoo.com