Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Fri, 28 Jan 2005 10:50:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1CubC6-0004PI-L3 for lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org; Fri, 28 Jan 2005 10:50:10 -0800 Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 10:50:10 -0800 To: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: Single numbers as years Message-ID: <20050128185010.GN20235@chain.digitalkingdom.org> References: <20050126194917.GW20235@chain.digitalkingdom.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i From: Robin Lee Powell X-archive-position: 1078 X-Approved-By: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-list: lojban-beginners Content-Length: 679 On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 12:37:15PM -0400, Betsemes wrote: > > Nick's solution to this is actually pretty obviously the best > > possible, but oddly enough still encounters resistance. :-) > > Nick's proposal is to always use 4 digits for years, and assume > > that the date is endian in some fashion (i.e. month/day/year is > > not allowed). > > Could you post a link to the full proposal if any? http://www.lojban.org/tiki/tiki-index.php?page=Dates About half-way down. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/ Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!" Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute - http://singinst.org/