Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Wed, 16 Feb 2005 15:53:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1D1YzG-0007LM-85 for lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 15:53:42 -0800 Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 15:53:42 -0800 To: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: learning lojban for computer science? Message-ID: <20050216235342.GV11349@chain.digitalkingdom.org> References: <13d.cf1d6c6.2f43ac1b@wmconnect.com> <4213B40B.5080304@mcihispeed.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4213B40B.5080304@mcihispeed.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i From: Robin Lee Powell X-archive-position: 1147 X-Approved-By: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-list: lojban-beginners Content-Length: 1381 On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 03:58:51PM -0500, ethan wrote: > On the main lojban site the software section doesn't seem to have > extensive software. wiki.lojban.org is better for that. > I was under the impression that lojban and loglan were partially > created with an eye towards human computer interaction. Is this > true? Not that I'm aware of, but many current Lojbanists are very interested in that area. > If so, is there a reason there is not more software? Is there some > fundamental problem that prevents this from happening? Time, money, and skill. In order of importance. For example, it takes a *tremendous* amount of time to record and mark up enough speech to make a good TTS system. STT is even harder; it *should* be possible to use Lojban's structure to make shortcuts here, but I don't think any current Lojbanists know enough about the field to do it. > Is it worth learning lojban if my main interest is computer > science? I think so. We'd love to have more CS people working on relevant projects. As an aside, there's a guy right now who's seriously investigating Lojban for RDF and the semantic web (two areas I know nothing about, myself). -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/ Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!" Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute - http://singinst.org/