Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Tue, 08 Mar 2005 23:25:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.44) id 1D8vZW-0000Kt-3o for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2005 23:25:34 -0800 Received: from rproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.170.195]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.44) id 1D8vZU-0000Kn-0I for lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2005 23:25:34 -0800 Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id z35so196703rne for ; Tue, 08 Mar 2005 23:25:30 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=lSwgPhfo8mWC56NhP1G3Fes8MbELIp1N0DX/VY1lVtb6kn1XaFEkh3n7M2Lt5pCCY1qarvpiisJILPJdlWLfVCgHIBxDmZGn/brS+H7LDaOKmfpxGd0X4lhFkZcnmLQqZZERRHo0nKrwy9HWX8u3/emaxJD3tWCi+q7W6D1D7hY= Received: by 10.38.82.51 with SMTP id f51mr559787rnb; Tue, 08 Mar 2005 23:25:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.38.208.61 with HTTP; Tue, 8 Mar 2005 23:25:30 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <537d06d005030823251dbe3f44@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 08:25:30 +0100 From: Philip Newton To: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: {nu penmi} versus {le nunpenmi} In-Reply-To: <20050308223828.GB4308@chain.digitalkingdom.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII References: <20050302194910.GI17705@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <200503022031.j22KVQTd000469@mole.e-mol.com> <20050302211229.GN17705@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <200503082226.j28MQoTd020725@mole.e-mol.com> <20050308223828.GB4308@chain.digitalkingdom.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "chain.digitalkingdom.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On Tue, 8 Mar 2005 14:38:28 -0800, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 05:26:50PM -0500, Matt Arnold wrote: > > OK, what about {se}, {te}, {ve}, and {xe}? Since {jbena}'s place > > structure is "x1 is born to x2 at time x3 and place x4", can a > > lujvo be coined as {teljbena} to mean "birthday" and {veljbana} to > > mean "birthplace"? > > Yes. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.5 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.1 RCVD_BY_IP Received by mail server with no name -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-archive-position: 1208 X-Approved-By: philip.newton@gmail.com X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-original-sender: philip.newton@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-list: lojban-beginners Content-Length: 697 On Tue, 8 Mar 2005 14:38:28 -0800, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 05:26:50PM -0500, Matt Arnold wrote: > > OK, what about {se}, {te}, {ve}, and {xe}? Since {jbena}'s place > > structure is "x1 is born to x2 at time x3 and place x4", can a > > lujvo be coined as {teljbena} to mean "birthday" and {veljbana} to > > mean "birthplace"? > > Yes. Well, terjbena actually. IIRC xel- was "reclaimed" from xelso to be the rafsi of xe, but ter- is still the "odd one out" in the series sel- ter- vel- xel-. (tel- is from stela.) Vaguely annoying but far too late to do anything about it. mu'o mi'e .filip. -- Philip Newton